Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T17:55:17.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 1 - Collaborative Reproductive Healthcare Model

A Patient-Centered Approach to Medical and Psychosocial Care

from I - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2022

By
Sharon N. Covington  and
G. David Adamson
Edited by
Sharon N. Covington
Sharon N. Covington
Affiliation:
Shady Grove Fertility, Rockville, MD
Get access

Summary

Extraordinary reproductive technologies are continuing to evolve for people needing medical assistance to have a child, which are replete with complex psychosocial issues. Optimal patient care involves the collaboration of numerous healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses, laboratory scientists, administrative staff, as well as counselors) working together to provide reproductive medical services. This chapter provides a biopsychosocial model for the medical and psychosocial assessment and treatment of individuals and couples seeking reproductive medical assistance. Beginning with an overview of infertility and reproductive physiology/pathophysiology, evaluation and treatment are discussed from a collaborative perspective of medical and psychosocial management. All aspects of reproductive medical care are presented from the lifestyle choices to assisted reproductive technologies including IVF, gamete donation and gestational surrogacy. The complex psychological challenges of patients dealing with significant medical conditions and the consequences of invasive medical procedures, coupled with treatment failures and loss are examined. In addition, a collaborative approach to decision-making in treatment and family building alternatives is discussed. The chapter also serves as a springboard to topics in the second edition of Fertility Counseling covering therapeutic approaches, assessment and preparation in assisted reproduction, addressing the needs of diverse of populations, practice issues, and special topics on pregnancy loss, reproductive trauma and resiliency, postpartum adjustment, and the pregnant therapist.

Keywords

reproductive medical careevaluationreproductive treatmentassisted reproductive technologyinfertilitypsychologicalpsychosocialfertility counselingcounseling
Type
Chapter
Information
Fertility Counseling: Clinical Guide , pp. 1 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boivin, J, Gameiro, S. The evolution of psychology and counseling in infertility. Fertil Steril 2015;104(2):251–259.Google Scholar
Norre, J, Wischmann, T. The position of the fertility counselor in a fertility team: a critical appraisal. Hum Fertil 2011;14(3):154–159. Epub July 7, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gameiro, S, Boivin, J, Domar, A. Optimal in vitro fertilization in 2020 should reduce treatment burden and enhance care delivery for patients and staff. Fertil Stertil 2013;100(2):302–309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Covington, SN. Infertility counseling in practice: a collaborative reproductive healthcare model. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 493–507.Google Scholar
Van Empel, IWH, Aarts, JWM, Cohlen, BJ, et al. Measuring patient-centredness, the neglected outcome in fertility care: a random multicentre validation study. Hum Reprod 2010;10:2516–2526.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Domar, AD, Shapiro, DB, Wischmann, TH, Fauser, BC, Verhaak, C. Tackling burden in ART: an integrated approach for medical staff. Hum Reprod 2012;27(4):941–950.Google Scholar
Evers, JL. Female subfertility. Lancet 2002;360:151–159.Google Scholar
Zegers, FZ, Adamson, GD, Dyer, S, et al . The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care: Led by ICMART in Partnership with ASRM, ESHRE, IFFS, March of Dimes, AFS, GIERAF, ASPIRE, MEFS, REDLARA, FIGO. Fertil Steril 2017;108(3):393–406.Google Scholar
te Velde, ER, Eijkemans, R, Habbema, HD. Variation in couple fecundity and time to pregnancy, an essential concept in human reproduction. Lancet 2000;355:1928–1929.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Snick, HKA, Snick, TS, Evers, JLH, Collins, JA. The spontaneous pregnancy prognosis in untreated subfertile couples. The Walcheren primary care study. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1582–1588.Google Scholar
Leridon, H. A new estimate of permanent sterility by age: sterility defined as the inability to conceive. Popul Stud 2008;62:15–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boivin, J, Bunting, L, Collins, JA, Nygren, KG. International estimates of infertility prevalence and treatment-seeking: potential need and demand for infertility medical care. Hum Reprod 2007;22(6):1506–1512.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurunath, S, Pandian, Z, Anderson, RA, et al. Defining infertility – a systematic review of prevalence studies. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17(5):575–588.Google Scholar
Wallace, WH, Kelsey, TW. Ovarian reserve and reproductive age may be determined from measurement of ovarian volume by transvaginal sonography. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1612–1617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hendershot, GE, Mosher, WD, Pratt, WF. Infertility and age: an unresolved issue. Fam Plan and Perspect 1982;14(5):287–289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinaman, MJ, Clegg, ED, Brown, CC, O’Connor, J, Selevan, SG. Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss. Fertil Steril 1996;65:503–509.Google Scholar
te Velde, ER, Pearson, PL. The variability of reproductive aging. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:141–154.Google Scholar
Nybo Andersen, A-M, Kjaer Urhoj, S. Is advanced paternal age a health risk for the offspring? Fertil Steril 2017;107(2):312–318.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Obesity and reproduction: a committee opinion. Birmingham, Alabama. Fertil Steril 2021;116:1266–1285.Google Scholar
Oscan Dağ, Z, Dilbaz, B. Impact of obesity on infertility in women. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc 2015;16(2):111–117.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Optimizing natural fertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013;100:631–637.Google Scholar
Mahony, M, Mottla, GL, Richter, KS, Ball, GD, Ansari, S, Hayward, B. Infertility patient clinical journey outcome depends on initial treatment, starting with ovulation induction vs in vitro fertilization (IVF): results from a large real-world database. ASRM Abstracts P-734, e-396. Fertil Steril (Suppl. September) 2019; 112(3): e396–e397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization. Endometriosis Fact Sheet. Available from: www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/endometriosis [last accessed June 15, 2022].Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN, Sigman, M, Collura, B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part II. Fertil Steril 2020;115(1):62–69.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Fertility evaluation of infertile women: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2021;116:1255–1265.Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN, Sigman, M, Collura, B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men: AUA/ASRM guideline part I. Fertil Steril 2020;115(1):54–61.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2020;114:1151–1157.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen, 6th edn. Published July 27, 2021. Available from: www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030787 [last accessed June 15, 2022].Google Scholar
Schlegel, PN, Sigman, M, Collura, B, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of infertility in men. AUA/ ASRM Guideline. American Urological Association. October 2020.Google Scholar
Oei, SG, Helmerhorst, FM, Bloemenkamp, KWM, Hollants, FAM, Meerpoel, DM, Keirse, MJNC. Effectiveness of the postcoital test. BMJ 1998;317:502–505.Google Scholar
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. The use of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;109:429–436.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) and World Bank. WHO Report on Disability. Available from: www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/world-report-on-disability [last accessed June 15, 2022].Google Scholar
Covington, SN, Ed. Fertility Counseling: Clinical Guide and Case Studies, 1st edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Griel, AL, Slausen-Belvins, K, McQuillan, J. The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Social Health Illn 2010;32(1):140–162.Google Scholar
Kenrick, DT, Griskevicius, V, Neuberg, SL, Schaller, M. Renovating the Pyramid of Needs: contemporary extensions built upon ancient foundations. Perspect Psychol Sci 2010;5(3):292–314.Google Scholar
Petok, WD. The psychology of gender-specific infertility diagnosis. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 37–60.Google Scholar
Jordan, C, Revenson, TA. Gender differences in coping with infertility: a meta-analysis. J Behav Med 1999;22:341–358.Google Scholar
Pasch, LA, Holley, SR, Bleil, ME, et al. Addressing the needs of fertility treatment patients and their partners: are they informed of and do they receive mental health services? Fertil Steril 2016;106(1):209–215.Google Scholar
Boivin, J, Takefman, J, Braverman, A. Development and preliminary validation of the fertility quality of life (FertiQoL) tool. Fertil Steril 2011;96:409–415.Google Scholar
Verhaak, CM, Lintsen, AME, Evers, AWM, Braat, DDM. Who is at risk of emotional problems and how to know? Screening of women going for IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2010;25:1234.Google Scholar
Newton, CR. The Fertility Problem Inventory: measuring perceived infertility-related stress. Fertil Steril 1999;72:54–62.Google Scholar
Hakim, LZ, Newton, CR, MacLean-Brine, D, Feyles, V. Evaluation of preparatory psychosocial counselling for medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 2012;27(7):2058–2066.Google Scholar
Boivin, J. A review of psychosocial interventions in infertility. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:2325–2341.Google Scholar
Covington, SN. Group approaches to infertility counseling. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 156–168.Google Scholar
Aarts, JWM, van den Haark, P, Nelen, WLDM, Tuil, WS, Faber, JJ, Kremer, JAM. Patient-focused Internet interventions in reproductive medicine: a scoping review. Hum Reprod Update 2012;18(2):211–227.Google Scholar
Roudsari, RL, Allan, HT, Smith, PA. Looking at infertility through the lens of religion and spirituality: a review of the literature. Hum Fertil 2007;10(30):141–149.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidance for Providers Caring for Women and Men of Reproductive Age with Possible Zika Virus Exposure (Modified from CDC, FDA and WHO Published Guidance). Updated July 2019.Google Scholar
American Society for Reproductive Medicine. COVID-19 Updates and Resources. www.asrm.org/news-and-publications/covid-19/ [last accessed June 15, 2022].Google Scholar
Scarpa, B, Dunson, DB, Colombo, B. Cervical mucus secretions on the day of intercourse: an accurate marker of highly fertile days. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 2006;125:72–78.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Use of clomiphene citrate in infertile women: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2013:100:341–348.Google Scholar
Teede, HJ, Misso, ML, Costello, MF, et al., on behalf of the International PCOS Network Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2018;110(3):364–379.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Role of metformin for ovulation induction in infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): a guideline. Fertil Steril 2017;108:426–441.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Fertility drugs and cancer: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1617–1626.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Current evaluation of amenorrhea. Fertil Steril 2008;90:S219–S225.Google Scholar
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility. Use of exogenous gonadotropins for ovulation induction in anovulatory women: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2020;113:66–70.Google Scholar
Mulders, AG, Laven, JS, Eijkemans, MJ, Hughes, EG, Fauser, BC. Patient predictors for outcome of gonadotrophin ovulation induction in women with normogonadotrophic anovulatory infertility: a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2003;9:429–449.Google Scholar
Reindollar, RH, Regan, MM, Neumann, PJ, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate optimal treatment for unexplained infertility: the fast track and standard treatment (FASTT) trial. Fertil Steril 2010;94:888–899.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, R, Danhof, NA, Tjon-Kon-Fat, RI, Eijkemans, MJ, Bossuyt, PM, Mochtar, MH, van der Veen, F, Bhattacharya, S, MoL, BWJ, van Wely, M. Interventions for unexplained infertility: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 5;9(9:CD012692. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012692.pub2. PMID: 31486548; PMCID: PMC6727181.Google Scholar
Goldman, MB, Reindollar, Neumann PJ, et al. A randomized clinical trial to determine optimal infertility treatment in older couples: the Forty and Over Treatment Trial (FORT-T). Fertil Steril 2014;101:1574–81.e2.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Removal of myomas in asymptomatic patients to improve fertility and/or reduce miscarriage rate: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2017;108:416–425.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Role of tubal surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2021;115:1143–1150.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Endometriosis and infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98:591–598.Google Scholar
Adamson, GD, Pasta, DJ. Endometriosis fertility index: the new, validated endometriosis staging system. Fertil Steril 2010;94(5):1609–1615.Google Scholar
Vesali, S, Razavi, M, Rezaeinejad, M, Maleki-Hajiagha, A, Maroufizadeh, S, Sepidarkishf, M. Endometriosis Fertility Index for predicting nonassisted reproductive technology pregnancy after endometriosis surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2020;127(7):800–809.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Report on varicocele and infertility. Fertil Steril 2008;90:S247–S249.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine in collaboration with the Society for Male Reproduction and Urology. Evaluation of the azoospermic male: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;109:777–782.Google Scholar
Steures, P, van der Steeg, JW, Hompes, PG, et al. Effectiveness of intrauterine insemination in subfertile couples with an isolated cervical factor: a randomized clinical trial. Fertil Steril 2007;88:1692–1696.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Evidence-based treatments for couples with unexplained infertility: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2020;113:305–322.Google Scholar
The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Evaluation and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2012;98:1103–1111.Google Scholar
Genest, G, Almasri, W, Banjar, S, et al. Immunotherapy for recurrent pregnancy loss: a reappraisal. F&S Reviews 2021 (online). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xfnr.2021.11.002Google Scholar
Wald, K, Hariton, E, Morris, JR, et al. Changing stimulation protocol on repeat conventional ovarian stimulation cycles does not lead to improved laboratory outcomes. Fertil Steril 2021;116:757–765.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Comparison of pregnancy rates for poor responders using IVF with mild ovarian stimulation versus conventional IVF: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2018;109:993–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamath, MS, Mascarenhas, M, Franik, S, Liu, E, Sunkara, SK. Clinical adjuncts in in vitro fertilization: a growing list. Fertil Steril 2019;112:978–986.Google Scholar
Farquhar, C. Add-ons for assisted reproductive technology: can we be honest here? Fertil Steril 2019;112:971–972.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Prevention and treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2016;106:1634–1647.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y, Guo, X, Guo, L, Chang, H-M, Shu, J, Leung, PCK. Outcomes comparison of IVF/ICSI among different trigger methods for final oocyte maturation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. FASEB Journal 2021;35(7):e21696. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.202100406rGoogle Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinically assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2018;110:1246–1252.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Birmingham, Alabama. Guidance on the limits to the number of embryos to transfer: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2021;116:651–654.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Birmingham, Alabama. Role of assisted hatching in in vitro fertilization: a guideline. Fertil Steril 2014;102:348–351.Google Scholar
Bonanno, GA, Westphal, M, Mancini, AD. Resilience to loss and potential trauma. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2001;7:511–535.Google Scholar
Herrmann, D, Scherg, H, Verres, R, von Hagens, C, Strowitzke, T, Wischmann, T. Resilience in infertile couples as a protective factor against infertility-specific distress and impaired quality of life. J Assist Reprod Genet 2011;28:1111–1117.Google Scholar
Kong, L, Fang, M, Ma, T, et al. Positive affect mediates the relationships between resilience, social support and posttraumatic growth of women with infertility. Psychol Health Med 2018;23:707–716.Google Scholar
Ockhuijsen, H, van den Hoogen, A, Eijkemans, M, Macklon, N, Boivin, J. The impact of a self-administered coping intervention on emotional well-being in women awaiting the outcome of IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 2014;29(7):1459–1470.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Practice Committee for the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Birmingham, Alabama. Guidance regarding gamete and embryo donation. Fertil Steril 2021;115:1395–1410.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Birmingham, Alabama. Recommendations for practices utilizing gestational carriers: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2017;107:e3–e10.Google Scholar
Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama. Interpretation of clinical trial results: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2020;113:295–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covington, SN, Burns, LH. Pregnancy after infertility. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 440–458.Google Scholar
Daniluk, JC. Reconstructing their lives: a longitudinal, qualitative analysis of the transition to biological childlessness for infertile couples. J Counsel Develop. 2001;79:439–449.Google Scholar
Takefman, JE. Ending treatment. In: Covington, SN, Burns, LH, Eds. Infertility Counseling: A Comprehensive Handbook for Clinicians, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006: 429–439.Google Scholar
Wischmann, T, Korge, K, Scherg, H, Strowitzki, T, Verres, R. A 10-year follow-up study of psychosocial factors affecting couples after infertility treatment. Hum Reprod 2012;27(11):3226–3232.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×