Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-10T14:15:16.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Should Constitutional Rights Reflect Popular Opinion? Interpreting Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization—CORRIGENDUM

Part of: Forum: Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2023

Mary Ziegler
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Corrigendum
Information
Modern American History , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 2023 , pp. 134
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - SA
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the same Creative Commons licence is used to distribute the re-used or adapted article and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

The article type for the article by ZiegerFootnote 1 was listed as “FORUM.” The correct article type is “FORUM: RIGHTS.”

This has been corrected.

References

1 Ziegler, Mary, “Should Constitutional Rights Reflect Popular Opinion? Interpreting Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization.” Modern American History 6 (2023): https://doi.org/10.1017/mah.2023.6Google Scholar.