Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T01:07:49.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The response of mouse oocytes injected with sea urchin spermatozoa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2008

T. Wakayama
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii School of Medicine, University of Tokyo and Ryukyn University
T. Uehara
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii School of Medicine, University of Tokyo and Ryukyn University
Y. Hayashi
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii School of Medicine, University of Tokyo and Ryukyn University
R. Yanagimachi*
Affiliation:
University of Hawaii School of Medicine, University of Tokyo and Ryukyn University
*
Ryuzo Yanagimachi, Department of Anatomy and Reproductive Biology, University of Hawaii School of Medicine, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA. Tel: 808-956-8746. Fax: 808-956-5474. e-mail: yana@hawaii.edu.

Summary

Sea urchin spermatozoa were injected into mature mouse oocytes to determine whether they can activate mouse oocytes and, if so, how they behave within the oocyte cytoplasm of such a distant species. While injection of a single spermatozoon into each oocyte did not activate any of the oocytes, injection of 10 spermatozoa activated about 20%. Within the cytoplasm of unactivated oocytes, sperm heads commonly transformed into chromosome-like structures. When a single spermatozoon was injected, and oocytes were then activated by Sr2+, about 30% of the activated oocytes had both female (mouse) and male (sea urchin) pronuclei when examined 8 h after sperm injection. These results indicated that sperm-borne oocyte activating factor(s) and the cytoplasmic factors controlling the development of the sperm pronucleus are not strictly species-specific.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bos-Mikich, A., Swann, K. & Whittingham, D.G. (1995). Calcium oscillations and protein synthesis inhibition synergistically activate mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 41, 8490.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatot, C.L., Ziomek, A., Bavister, B.D., Lewis, J.L. & Torres, I. (1989). An improved culture medium supports development of random-bred 1-cell mouse embryos in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil. 86, 679–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chatot, C.L., Lewis, J.L., Torres, I. & Ziomek, C.A. (1990). Development of one-cell embryos form different strains of mice in CZB medium. Biol. Reprod. 42, 432–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, B., De Felice, L.J. & Ehrenstein, G. (1985). Injection of a soluble sperm extract into sea urchin eggs triggers the cortical reaction. Experientia 41, 1068–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, K. & Joanne, T.K. (1992). Repetitive calcium transients and the role of calcium in exocytosis and cell cycle activation in the mouse egg. Dev.Biol. 149, 80–9.Google Scholar
Dozortsev, D., Rybouchkin, A., De Sutter, P., Qian, C. & Dhont, M. (1995). Human oocyte activation following intracytoplasmic injection: the role of the sperm cell. Hum. Reprod. 10, 403–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiramoto, Y. (1962). Microinjection of the live spermatozoa into sea urchin eggs. Exp. Cell Res. 27, 416–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Homa, S.T. & Swann, K. (1994). A cytosolic sperm factor triggers calcium oscillations and membrane hyperpolarizations in human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 9, 2356–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Y. & Yanagimachi, R. (1995). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol. Reprod. 52, 709–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, D. & Kline, J.T. (1992). Repetitive calcium transients and the role of calcium in exocytosis and cell cycle activation in the mouse egg. Dev. Biol. 149, 80–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, J.D., Kamiguchi, Y. & Yanagimachi, R. (1996). Analysis of chromosome constitution of human spermatozoa with normal and aberrant head morphologies after injection into mouse oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 11 1942–6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillie, F.R. (1914). Study of fertilization. VI. The mechanism Study of fertilization in Arbacia. J. Exp. Zool. 16, 523–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagy, Z.P., Liu, J., Joris, H., Verheyen, C., Tournaye, H., Camus, M., Derde, M.P., Devroey, P. & Van Stairteghem, A. (1995). The result of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is not related to any of the three basic sperm parameters. Hum. Reprod. 10, 1123–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palermo, G.D., Cohen, J. & Rosenwaks, Z. (1996). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a powerful tool to overcome fertilization failure. Fertil. Steril. 65, 899908.Google ScholarPubMed
Parrington, J., Swann, K., Shevchenko, V.I., Sesay, A.K. & Lai, F.A. (1996). Calcium oscillations in mammalian eggs triggered by a soluble sperm protein. Nature 379 364–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rybouchkin, A., Dozortsev, D., De Sutter, P., Qian, C. & Dhont, M. (1995). Intracytoplasmic injection of human sperm into mouse oocytes: a useful model to investigate oocyte activating capacity and the karyotype of human sperm. Hum. Reprod. 10, 1130–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swann, K. (1996). Soluble sperm factors and CaCa2+ release in eggs at fertilization. Rev. Reprod. 1 33–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uehara, T. & Yanagimachi, R. (1976). Microsurgical injection of spermatozoa into hamster eggs with subsequent transformation of sperm nuclei into male pronuclei Biol. Reprod. 15 467–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Steirteghem, A.C., Nagy, Z., Joris, H., Liu, J., Staessen, C., Smitz, J., Wisanto, A. & Devroey, P. (1993). High fertilization and implantation rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod. 8, 1061–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whittingham, D.G. & Siracusa, G. (1978). The involvement of calcium in the activation of mammalian oocytes. Exp.Cell Res. 113 311–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed