Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Porcine oocyte mtDNA copy number is high or low depending on the donor

  • Hanne Skovsgaard Pedersen (a1), Peter Løvendahl (a2), Knud Larsen (a2), Lone Bruhn Madsen (a2) and Henrik Callesen (a3)...

Summary

Oocyte capacity is relevant in understanding decreasing female fertility and in the use of assisted reproductive technologies in human and farm animals. Mitochondria are important to the development of a functionally good oocyte and the oocyte mtDNA copy number has been introduced as a useful parameter for prediction of oocyte competence. The aim of this study was to investigate: (i) if the oocyte donor has an influence on its oocyte's mtDNA copy number; and (ii) the relation between oocyte size and mtDNA copy number using pre- and postpubertal pig oocytes. Cumulus–oocyte complexes were collected from individual donor pigs. The oocytes were allocated into different size-groups, snap-frozen and single-oocyte mtDNA copy number was estimated by quantitative real-time PCR using the genes ND1 and COX1. Results showed that mean mtDNA copy number in oocytes from any individual donor could be categorized as either ‘high’ (≥100,000) or ‘low’ (<100,000) with no difference in threshold between pre- and postpubertal oocytes. No linear correlation was detected between oocyte size and mtDNA copy number within pre- and postpubertal oocytes. This study demonstrates the importance of the oocyte donor in relation to oocyte mtDNA copy number, irrespectively of the donor's puberty status and the oocyte's growth stage. Observations from this study facilitate both further investigations of the importance of mtDNA copy number and the unravelling of relations between different mitochondrial parameters and oocyte competence.

Copyright

Corresponding author

All correspondence to: Hanne Skovsgaard Pedersen. Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, DK-8830 Tjele, Denmark. Tel: +45 8715 7984. Fax: +45 8715 4249. E-mail: Hanne.Skovsgaard@anis.au.dk

References

Hide All
Al-Mashhadi, R.H., Sørensennm, C.B., Kragh, P.M., Christoffersen, C., Mortensen, M.B., Tolbod, L.P., Thim, T., Du, Y., Li, J., Liu, Y., Moldt, B., Schmidt, M., Vajta, G., Larsen, T., Purup, S., Bolund, L., Nielsen, L.B., Callesen, H., Falk, E., Mikkelsen, J.G. & Bentzon, J.F. (2013). Familial hypercholesterolemia and atherosclerosis in cloned minipigs created by DNA transposition of a human PCSK9 gain-of-function mutant. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 166ra1 doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3004853
Alviggi, C., Humaidan, P., Howles, C.M., Tredway, D. & Hillier, S.G. (2009). Biological versus chronological ovarian age: implications for assisted reproductive technology. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 7, 101–14.
Bagg, M.A., Nottle, M.B., Armstrong, D.T. & Grupen, C.G. (2007). Relationship between follicle size and oocyte developmental competence in prepubertal and adult pigs. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 19, 797803.
Barritt, J., Willadsen, S., Brenner, C. & Cohen, J. (2001). Cytoplasmic transfer in assisted reproduction. Hum. Reprod. Update 7, 428–35.
Bernt, M., Brabrand, A., Schierwater, B. & Stadler, P.F. (2013). Genomic aspects of mitochondrial genome evolution. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 69, 328–38.
Bjerre, D., Madsen, L.B., Bendixen, C. & Larsen, K. (2006). Porcine Parkin: molecular cloning of PARK2 cDNA, expression analysis., and identification of a splicing variant. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 347, 803–13.
Cotterill, M., Harris, S.E., Fernandez, E.C., Lu, J., Huntriss, J.D., Campbell, B.K. & Picton, H.M. (2013). The activity and copy number of mitochondrial DNA in ovine oocytes throughout oogenesis in vivo and during oocyte maturation in vitro . Mol. Hum. Reprod. 19, 444–50.
Eisele, J., Schaefer, I.M., Randel Nyengaard, J., Post, H., Liebetanz, D., Brüel, A. & Mühlfeld, C. (2008). Effect of voluntary exercise on number and volume of cardiomyocytes and their mitochondria in the mouse left ventricle. Basic Res. Cardiol. 103, 1221.
El Shourbagy, S.H., Spikings, E.C., Freitas, M. & St John, J.C. (2006). Mitochondria directly influence fertilisation outcome in the pig. J. Reprod. Fertil. 131, 233–45.
Endo, M., Kimura, K., Kuwayama, T., Monji, Y. & Iwata, H. (2012). Effect of oestradiol during culture of bovine oocyte–granulosa cell complexes on the mitochondrial DNA copies of oocytes and telomere length of granulosa cells. Zygote 12, 19.
Hansen, P.J. (2011). Challenges to fertility in dairy cattle: from ovulation to the fetal stage of pregnancy. Rev. Bras. Reprod. Anim. 35, 229–38.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (2012). Fertility treatment in 2012, trends and figures. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/FertilityTreatment2012TrendsFigures.PDF
Ikeda, K. & Takahashi, Y. (2003). Comparison of maturational and developmental parameters of oocytes recovered from prepubertal and adult pigs. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 15, 215–21.
Iwata, H., Goto, H., Tanaka, H., Sakaguchi, Y., Kimura, K., Kuwayama, T. & Monji, Y. (2011). Effect of maternal age on mitochondrial DNA copy number, ATP content and IVF outcome of bovine oocytes. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 23, 424–32.
Li, J., Pedersen, H.S., Li, R., Adamsen, J., Liu, Y., Schmidt, M., Purup, S. & Callesen, H. (2013). Developmental potential of pig embryos reconstructed by use of sow versus pre-pubertal gilt oocytes after somatic cell nuclear transfer. Zygote 18, 110.
Løvendahl, P. & Chagunda, M.G.G. (2011). Covariance among milking frequency., milk yield., and milk composition from automatically milked cows. J. Dairy Sci. 94, 5381–92.
Marchal, R., Vigneron, C., Perreau, C., Bali-Papp, A. & Mermillod, P. (2002). Effect of follicular size on meiotic and developmental competence of porcine oocytes. Theriogenology 57, 1523–32.
May-Panloup, P., Chretien, M.F., Jacques, C., Vasseur, C., Malthiery, Y. & Reynier, P. (2005). Low oocyte mitochondrial DNA content in ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Reprod. 20, 593–7.
Pedersen, H.S., Callesen, H., Løvendahl, P., Chen, F., Nyengaard, J.R., Nikolaisen, N.K., Holm, P. & Hyttel, P. (2014). Ultrastructure and mitochondrial numbers in pre- and postpubertal pig oocytes. Reprod. Fert. Dev. doi.org/10.1071/RD14220 [Epub ahead of print]
Pedersen, H.S., Løvendahl, P., Larsen, K., Madsen, L.B. & Callesen, H. (2015a). mtDNA copy number in oocytes of different sizes from individual pre- and postpubertal pigs. Reprod. Fert. Dev. 27, 181182.
Pedersen, H.S., Liu, Y., Li, R., Purup, S., Løvendahl, P., Holm, P., Hyttel, P. & Callesen, H. (2015b). Selection of pre- versus postpubertal pig oocytes for parthenogenetic activation and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Reprod. Fert. Dev. 27, 544–50.
Piko, L. & Matsumoto, L. (1976). Number of mitochondria and some properties of mitochondrial DNA in the mouse egg. Dev. Biol. 49, 110.
Ponsart, C., Le Bourhis, D., Knijn, H., Fritz, S., Guyader-Joly, C., Otter, T., Lacaze, S., Charreauz, F., Schibler, L., Dupassieux, D. & Mullaart, E. (2014). Reproductive technologies and genomic selection in dairy cattle. Reprod. Fert. Dev. 26, 1221.
Reader, K.L., Cox, N.R., Stanton, J.L. & Juengel, J.L. (2014). Mitochondria and vesicles differ between adult and prepubertal sheep oocytes during IVM. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. doi.org/10.1071/RD13359 [Epub ahead of print]
Reynier, P., May-Panloup, P., Chrétien, M.F., Morgan, C.J., Jean, M., Savagner, F., Barrière, P. & Malthièry, Y. (2001). Mitochondrial DNA content affects the fertilizability of human oocytes. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 7, 425–9.
Santos, T.A., El Shourbagy, S. & St John, J.C. (2006). Mitochondrial content reflects oocyte variability and fertilization outcome. Fertil. Steril. 85, 584–91.
Sato, D., Itami, N., Tasaki, H., Takeo, S., Kuwayama, T. & Iwata, H. (2014). Relationship between mitochondrial DNA copy number and SIRT1 expression in porcine oocytes. PLoS One 9, e94488.
Schilling, M.F., Watkins, A.E. & Watkins, W. (2002). Is human height bimodal? The American Statistician 56, 223–9.
Shoubridge, E.A. & Wai, T. (2007). Mitochondrial DNA and the mammalian oocyte. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 77, 87111.
Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies (2013). Clinic Summary Reports. https://www.sartcorsonline.com/rptCSR_PublicMultYear.aspx?ClinicPKID=0
Wai, T., Ao, A., Zhang, X., Cyr, D., Dufort, D. & Shoubridge, E.A. (2010). The role of mitochondrial DNA copy number in mammalian fertility. Biol. Reprod. 83, 5262.
Wang, J. & Sauer, M.V. (2006). In vitro fertilization (IVF): a review of three decades of clinical innovation and technological advancement. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2, 355–64.
Yoshioka, K., Suzuki, C., Tanaka, A., Anas, I.M.K. & Iwamura, S. (2002). Birth of piglets derived from porcine zygotes cultured in a chemically defined medium. Biol. Reprod. 66, 112–9.
Zeng, H.T., Ren, Z., Yeung, W.S., Shu, Y.M., Xu, Y.W., Zhuang, G.L. & Liang, X.Y. (2007). Low mitochondrial DNA and ATP contents contribute to the absence of birefringent spindle imaged with PolScope in in vitro matured human oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 22, 1681–6.
Zick, M., Rabl, R. & Reichert, A.S. (2009). Cristae formation – linking ultrastructure and function of mitochondria. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1793, 519.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Zygote
  • ISSN: 0967-1994
  • EISSN: 1469-8730
  • URL: /core/journals/zygote
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed