Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:12:21.929Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expression of SRG3, a chromatin-remodelling factor, in the mouse oocyte and early preimplantation embryos

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2007

F. Sun
Affiliation:
Programme for Graduation Studies, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, P.R. China.
F. Tang
Affiliation:
Center for Developmental Biology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China.
A Y. Yan
Affiliation:
Center for Developmental Biology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China.
H. Y. Fang
Affiliation:
Center for Developmental Biology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China.
H. Z. Sheng*
Affiliation:
Center for Developmental Biology, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, P.R. China.
*
All correspondence to: Hui Z. Sheng, Center for Developmental Biology, 1665 Kong-Jiang Road, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, P.R. China. Tel: +86 21 5557 0361. Fax: +86 21 5557 0017. e-mail: hzsheng2003@yahoo.com

Summary

SRG3 (Smarcc1) is a core subunit of the SWI/SNF complex. In the absence of SRG3, embryonic development ceases during peri-implantation stages, indicating that SRG3, as well as the chromatin-remodelling process, plays an essential role in early mouse development. To gain a better understanding of chromatin remodelling during the early stages of development, we examined SRG3 expression during oogenesis and preimplantation stages using immunofluorescence and western blot assays. SRG3 was detected in nuclei of oocytes during growth and maturation. Following fertilization, SRG3 was detected in pronuclei shortly after their formation. Nuclear concentrations of SRG3 increased in a time-dependent fashion and were found to be greater in the male pronucleus than in the female pronucleus. The increase in nuclear SRG3 was partially inhibited by a protein synthesis inhibitor, but not by a transcriptional inhibitor. Expression of SRG3 is accompanied by expression of Brg1 and Ini1, two other core subunits of the SWI/SNF complex. The expression of these three remodelling factors parallels that of SP1 and TBP, both spatially and temporally, in the mouse embryo, suggesting a role for remodelling factors in chromatin structure and function during early development.

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adenot, P.G., Mercier, Y., et al., (1997). Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development 124, 4615–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aoki, F., Worrad, D.M., et al., (1997). Regulation of transcriptional activity during the first and second cell cycles in the preimplantation mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 181, 296307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouniol-Baly, C., Hamraoui, L., et al., (1999). Differential transcriptional activity associated with chromatin configuration in fully grown mouse germinal vesicle oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 60 (3), 580–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bouniol, C., Nguyen, E., et al., (1995). Endogenous transcription occurs at the 1-cell stage in the mouse embryo. Exp. Cell Res. 218, 5762.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bultman, S., Gebuhr, T., et al., (2000). A Brg1 null mutation in the mouse reveals functional differences among mammalian SWI/SNF complexes. Mol. Cell 6, 1287–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bultman, S.J., Gebuhr, T.C., et al., (2006). Maternal BRG1 regulates zygotic genome activation in the mouse. Genes Dev. 20, 1744–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De La Fuente, R. (2006). Chromatin modifications in the germinal vesicle (GV) of mammalian oocytes. Dev. Biol. 292, 112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De La Fuente, R., Viveiros, M.M., et al., (2004). Major chromatin remodeling in the germinal vesicle (GV) of mammalian oocytes is dispensable for global transcriptional silencing but required for centromeric heterochromatin function. Dev. Biol. 275, 447–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guidi, C.J., Sands, A.T., et al., (2001). Disruption of Ini1 leads to peri-implantation lethality and tumorigenesis in mice. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 3598–603.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harlow, E. & Lane, D. (1988). Antibodies: a Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.Google Scholar
Imhof, A. & Wolffe, A. P. (1998). Transcription: gene control by targeted histone acetylation. Curr. Biol. 8, R4224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, J.K., Huh, S.O., et al., (2001). Srg3, a mouse homolog of yeast SWI3, is essential for early embryogenesis and involved in brain development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21, 7787–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Y. & Yanagimachi, R. (1995). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection in the mouse. Biol. Reprod. 52, 709–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klinger, F.G. & De Felici, M. (2002). In vitro development of growing oocytes from fetal mouse oocytes: stage-specific regulation by stem cell factor and granulosa cells. Dev. Biol. 244, 8595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klochendler-Yeivin, A., Fiette, L., et al., (2000). The murine SNF5/INI1 chromatin-remodeling factor is essential for embryonic development and tumor suppression. EMBO Rep. 1, 500–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, E. (2002). Chromatin modification and epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3, 662–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matzuk, M.M., Burns, K.H., et al., (2002). Intercellular communication in the mammalian ovary: oocytes carry the conversation. Science 296, 2178–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, G.P., Lintern-Moore, S.M., et al., (1974). RNA synthesis in the mouse oocyte. J. Cell Biol. 60, 416–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nonchev, S. & Tsanev, R. (1990). Protamine–histone replacement and DNA replication in the male mouse pronucleus. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 25, 72–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Phelan, M.L., Sif, S., et al., (1999). Reconstitution of a core chromatin-remodeling complex from SWI/SNF subunits. Mol. Cell. 3, 247–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ram, P.T. & Schultz, R.M. (1993). Reporter gene expression in G2 of the 1-cell mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 156, 552–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santos, F., Hendrich, B., et al., (2002). Dynamic reprogramming of DNA methylation in the early mouse embryo. Dev. Biol. 241, 172–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, R.M. (1993). Regulation of zygotic gene activation in the mouse. Bioessays 15, 531–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schultz, R.M. (2002). The molecular foundations of the maternal to zygotic transition in the preimplantation embryo. Hum. Reprod. Update 8, 323–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C.L. & Peterson, C.L. (2005). ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 65, 115–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varga-Weisz, P.D. & Becker, P.B. (1998). Chromatin-remodeling factors: machines that regulate? Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 10, 346–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vignon, X., Zhou, Q. et al. ., (2002). Chromatin as a regulative architecture of the early developmental functions of mammalian embryos after fertilization or nuclear transfer. Cloning Stem Cells 4, 363–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Worrad, D.M., Ram, P.T., et al., (1994). Regulation of gene expression in the mouse oocyte and early preimplantation embryo: developmental changes in Sp1 and TATA box-binding protein, TBP. Development 120, 2347–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, P., Patel, B., et al., (2004). Expression of genes encoding chromatin regulatory factors in developing rhesus monkey oocytes and preimplantation stage embryos: possible roles in genome activation. Biol. Reprod. 70, 1419–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed