Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Comparative expression analysis of embryonic development-related genes at different stages of parthenogenetic and in vitro fertilized embryos in caprine

  • Renu Singh (a1), Kuldeep Kumar (a1), R. Ranjan (a1), Manish Kumar (a1), T. Yasotha (a1), R.K. Singh (a1), B.C. Das (a1), M. Sarkar (a1) and Sadhan Bag (a2)...

Summary

Aberrant gene expression occurs in parthenogenetic embryos due to abnormal epigenetic modifications in the genome that probably diminish viability and enhance developmental abnormalities in these embryos. In the present study, five developmentally important genes (HPRT1, Cx43, Sox2, Mest and IGF2R) were analysed at different stages in parthenotes (haploid and diploid) and compared with similar stages in in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. The results indicated that in haploid parthenotes expression of HPRT1 was upregulated (P < 0.05) only at the 2–4-cell stage whereas Cx43 expression was significantly (P < 0.05) downregulated in all stages as compared with the control. However, expression of this gene was upregulated (P < 0.05) in 2–4-cell and morula stages of diploid parthenotes. Expression of Sox2 was significantly (P < 0.05) downregulated in morula stage haploid parthenotes, whereas it was upregulated (P < 0.05) in 8–16-cell stage diploid embryos. The expression of Mest was upregulated (P < 0.05) at the 2–4-cell stage of both haploid and diploid parthenotes, whereas it was downregulated in 8–16-cell stage diploid embryos as compared with control. IGF2R expression was upregulated (P < 0.05) only in morula stage haploid and diploid parthenote as compared with control. These results indicate that parthenogenetic embryos showed aberrant gene expression of developmentally important genes such as HPRT1, Cx43, Sox2, Mest and IGF2R in comparison with IVF embryos, this finding may be one of the major reasons for the poor developmental competence of parthenogenetic embryos.

Copyright

Corresponding author

All correspondence to: Sadhan Bag. Physiology and Climatology Division, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar-243 122, Bareilly, India. e-mail: bag658@gmail.com

References

Hide All
Amarnath, D., Li, X., Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. (2007). Gene expression in individual bovine somatic cell cloned embryos at the 8-cell and blastocyst stages of preimplantation development. J. Reprod. Dev. 53, 1247–63.
Bebbere, D., Bogliolo, L., Ariu, F., Fois, S., Leoni, G.G., Succu, S., Berlinguer, F. & Ledda, S. (2010). Different temporal gene expression patterns for ovine preimplantation embryos produced by parthenogenesis or in vitro fertilization. Theriogenology 74, 712–23.
Chen, Y.S., Rebecca, A.P., Rebecca, L.E., Rachel, H., Ernst, J.W. & Nicholas, M.F. (2012). Molecule mesengenic induction of human induced pluripotent stem cells to generate mesenchymal stem/stromal cells. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 1, 8395.
Davies, W., Isles, A.R. & Wilkinson, L.S. (2005). Imprinted gene expression in the activity during imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5198–203.
Feil, R., Khosla, S., Cappai, P. & Loi, P. (1998). Genomic imprinting in ruminants: allele-specific gene expression in parthenogenetic sheep. Mamm. Gen. 9, 831–4.
Finette, B.A., Kendall, H. & Vacek, P.M. (2002). Mutational spectral analysis at the HPRT locus in healthy children. Mutat. Res. 505, 2741.
Fukui, Y., Sawai, K., Furudate, M., Sato, N., Iwazumi, Y. & Ohsaki, K. (1992). Parthenogenetic development of bovine oocytes treated with ethanol and cytochalasin B after in vitro maturation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 33, 357–62.
Han, D.W., Song, S.J., Uhum, S.J., Do, J.T., Kim, N.H., Chung, K.S. & Lee, H.T. (2003). Expression of IGF2 and IGF receptor mRNA in bovine nuclear transfered embryos. Zygote 11, 245–52.
Hardy, K., Warner, A., Winston, R.M. & Becker, D.L. (1996). Expression of intercellular junctions during preimplantation development of the human embryo. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2, 621–32.
John, R.M. & Surani, M.A. (1996). Imprinted genes and regulation of gene expression by epigenetic inheritance. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol. 8, 348–53.
Kato, Y., Rideout, W.M 3rd, Hilton, K., Barton, S.C., Tsunoda, Y. & Surani, M.A. (1999). Development potential of mouse primordial germ cells. Development 126, 1823–32.
Kihara, A.H., de Castro, L.M., Moriscot, A.S. & Hamassaki, D.E. (2006). Prolonged dark adaptation changes connexin expression in the mouse retina. J. Neurosci. Res. 83, 1331–41.
Laird, D.W. (2006). Life cycle of connexins in health and disease. Biochem. J. 394, 527–43.
Latham, K.E. (2005). Expression of X-linked genes in androgenetic, gynogenetic, and normal mouse preimplantation embryos. Dev. Gen. 17, 212–22.
Li, J., Pan, G., Cui, K., Liu, Y., Xu, S. & Pei, D. (2007). A dominant-negative form of mouse Sox-2 induces trophectoderm differentiation and progressive polyploidy in mouse embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 19481–92.
Li, L., Keverne, E.B., Aparicio, S.A., Ishino, F., Barton, S.C. & Surani, M.A. (1999). Regulation of maternal behavior bovine oocytes treated with ethanol and cytochalasin B after in vitro maturation. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 33, 357–62.
Li, X., Kato, Y. & Tsunoda, Y. (2005). Comparative analysis of development-related gene expression in mouse preimplantation embryos with different development potential. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 72, 152–60.
Liu, J.H., Zhu, J.Q., Liang, X.W., Yin, S., Ola, S.I., Hou, Y., Chen, D.Y., Schatten, H. & Sun, Q.Y. (2008). Diploid parthenogenetic embryos adopt a maternal-type methylation pattern on both sets of maternal chromosomes. Genomics 91, 121–8.
Magnani, L. & Cabot, R.A. (2008). In vitro and in vivo derived porcine embryos possess similar, but not identical patterns of Oct-4, Nanog and Sox-2 mRNA expression during cleavage development. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 75, 1726–35.
Mann, J.R. & Lovell-Badge, R.H. (1987). The development of XO gynogenetic mouse embryos. Development 99, 411–6.
Mann, M.R., Lee, S.S., Doherty, A.S., Verona, R.I. & Nolen, L.D. (2004). Selective loss of imprinting in the placenta following preimplantation development in culture. Development 131, 3727–35.
Masui, S., Nakatake, Y., Toyooka, Y., Shimosato, D., Yagi, R., Takahashi, K., Okochi, H., Okuda, A., Matoba, R., Sharov, A.A., Ko, M.S. & Niwa, H. (2007). Pluripotency governed by Sox-2 via regulation of Oct3/4 expression in mouse embryonic stem cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 9, 625–35.
McGrath, J. & Solter, D. (1984). Completion of mouse embryogenesis requires both the maternal and paternal genomes. Cell 37, 179–83.
Ogawa, H., Wu, Q., Komiyama, J., Obata, Y. & Kono, T. (2006). Disruption of parental-specific expression of imprinted genes in uniparental fetuses. FEBS Lett. 580, 5377–84.
Ono, R., Nakamura, K., Inoue, K., Naruse, M., Usami, T., Wakisaka-Saito, N., Hino, T., Suzuki-Migishima, R., Ogonuki, N., Miki, H., Kohda, T., Ogura, A., Yokoyama, M., Kaneko-Ishino, T. & Ishino, F. (2006). Deletion of Peg10, an imprinted gene acquired from a retrotransposon, causes early embryonic lethality. Nat. Genet. 38, 101–6.
Park, S.H., Park, S.B. & Kim, N.H. (2003). Expression of early development related genes in bovine nuclear transferred and fertilized embryos. Zygote 11, 355–60.
Pauler, F.M. & Barlow, D.P. (2006). Imprinting mechanisms—it only takes two. Gen. Dev. 20, 1203–6.
Reuss, B., Hellmann, P., Traub, O., Butterweck, A. & Winterhager, E. (1997). Expression of connexin31 and connexin43 genes in early rat embryos. Dev. Gen. 21, 8290.
Sturm, K., Lafferty, M. & Tam, P.P.L. (1999). Pgk1 and Hprt1 gene activity in preimplantation mouse embryo is influenced by the paternal origin of the chromosome. Int. J. Dev. Biol. 43, 6979.
Szabo, P.E. & Mann, J.R. (1996). Maternal and paternal genomes function independently in mouse ova in establishing expression of the imprinted genes Snrpn and Igf2r: no evidence for allelic trans-sensing and counting mechanisms. EMBO J. 15, 6018–25.
Totey, S.M., Singh, G.P., Taneja, M., Pawsche, C.H. & Talwar, G. (1992). In vitro maturation and fertilization of follicular oocytes from buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). J. Reprod. Fertil. 95, 597607.
Walker, S.K., Hartwich, K.M. & Seemark, F.R. (1996). production of usually large offspring following embryo manipulation: concept and challenges. Theriogenology 45, 111–20.
Yang, L., Chavatte-Palmer, P., Kubota, C., O'Neill, M., Hoagland, T., Renard, J., Taneja, M., Yang, X. & Tian, X.C. (2005). Expression of imprinted genes is aberrant in deceased newborn cloned calves and relatively normal in surviving adult clones. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 71, 431–8.

Keywords

Comparative expression analysis of embryonic development-related genes at different stages of parthenogenetic and in vitro fertilized embryos in caprine

  • Renu Singh (a1), Kuldeep Kumar (a1), R. Ranjan (a1), Manish Kumar (a1), T. Yasotha (a1), R.K. Singh (a1), B.C. Das (a1), M. Sarkar (a1) and Sadhan Bag (a2)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed