Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:33:50.745Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Washington Consensus Reconsidered: Towards a New Global Governance edited by Narcis Serra and Joseph E. Stiglitz Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2008

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

Richard Blackhurst
Affiliation:
The Fletcher School, Tufts University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This ‘element’, in particular, draws attention to the near total neglect, among advocates of new approaches to development, of the extensive literature on public choice theory, rent seeking, and agency capture. Where is the mention of the beneficial role of external pressure – from international organizations, international obligations, and trading partners – as an aid to reform-minded ministers confronting politically powerful and entrenched special interest groups?

2 Considering the amount of time Stiglitz spends criticizing the GATT/WTO system, it would be helpful if he were correctly informed about at least the basic principles of the system. As an example, consider his statement in the footnote on page 9 of the book under review: ‘But the alternative [to subsidies], tariff protection or quotas, are not allowed under the WTO regime.’ There is a general prohibition of quotas, but tariff protection is perfectly legal. It is true there is some pressure to reduce tariffs during trade rounds, especially if the country is making its own demands on trading partners, but there is no legal obligation whatsoever to respond to those pressures.

4 Becker and Posner argue that the extent of the backlash against capitalism will depend on the depth and length of the current economic crisis.