Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Russia–Tariff Treatment: Identifying Systematic Violations of WTO Law

  • KARA M. REYNOLDS (a1) and BORIS RIGOD (a2)

Abstract

In October 2014, the European Union requested consultations with Russia under the WTO's dispute settlement system regarding Russia's tariff treatment of various agricultural and manufacturing products. Although most of the measures challenged by the EU were individual tariff lines, the final measure in its complaint was a ‘more general measure’ referred to as the systematic duty variation. A WTO Dispute Panel eventually ruled that the EU failed to establish the systematic nature of the duty treatment afforded by Russia to certain products. In this paper, we explore the Dispute Panel's ruling, as well as how claims of systematic non-compliance are treated in other legal settings. We conclude by exploring whether future WTO Panels should instead consider statistical evidence of systematic treatment to promote compliance.

Copyright

Corresponding author

References

Hide All
Bagwell, K., and Staiger, R. W. (1999), ‘An Economic Theory of GATT’, American Economic Review, 89(1): 215248.
Bagwell, K., and Staiger, R. W. (2011). ‘What Do Trade Negotiators Negotiate About? Empirical Evidence from the World Trade Organization’, The American Economic Review, 101(4): 12381273.
Bown, C. P. and Reynolds, K. M. (2017), ‘Trade Agreements and Enforcement: Evidence from WTO Dispute Settlement’, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 9(4): 64100.
Bown, C. P. and Reynolds, K. M. (2015), ‘Trade Flows and Trade Disputes’, The Review of International Organizations, 10(2): 145177.
Broda, C., Limao, N., and Weinstein, D. E. (2008), ‘Optimal Tariffs and Market Power: The Evidence’, The American Economic Review, 98(5): 20322065.
Conconi, P. and Schepel, H. (2017) ‘Argentina–Import Measures: How a Porsche is Worth Peanuts’, World Trade Review, 16(2): 349369.
European Commission of Human Rights (1977), ‘Ireland versus United Kingdom’, Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights: 762.
Ermacora, F. (1974), ‘Procedures to Deal with Human Rights Violations: A Hopeful Start in the United Nations?’, Human Rights Journal, 7: 670689.
King, A. G. (2007), ‘“Gross Statistical Disparities” as Evidence of a Pattern and Practice of Discrimination: Statistical versus Legal Significance’, The Labor Lawyer, 22: 271292.
Medina Quiroga, C. (1988), The Battle of Human Rights, Gross, Systematic Violations and the Inter-American System, The Hague, Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
OHCHR (2012), ‘The Corporate Responsibility to Respect Human Rights: An Interpretative Guide’, UN doc. HR/PUB/12/02, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
Paetzold, R. L. and Willborn, S. L. (2002) The Statistics of Discrimination: Using Statistical Evidence in Discrimination Cases, Colorado Springs, CO: Shepards/McGraw-Hill.
Romei, A. and Ruggieri, S. (2014), ‘A Multidisciplinary Survey on Discrimination Analysis’, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 29(5): 582638.

Russia–Tariff Treatment: Identifying Systematic Violations of WTO Law

  • KARA M. REYNOLDS (a1) and BORIS RIGOD (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed