Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T03:08:04.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Small fish–big issues: the effect of trade policy on the global shrimp market

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2010

PETER DEBAERE
PETER DEBAERE*
Affiliation:
Darden Business School, University of Virginia, CEPR
*
*Email: DebaereP@darden.virginia.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is a well-established theoretical result that the trade policy of a large country can directly affect its own and other countries' welfares by affecting international goods' prices. However, there exist very few empirical studies that analyze the effect of trade policy on international prices. With detailed data on unit values and tariffs, I show how policy actions in Europe disrupted the global shrimp market in a non-negligible way and set the stage for the anti-dumping case in the United States. The loss of Thailand's preferential trade status in Europe and the international differences in food-safety standards during the antibiotics crisis shifted especially Thai, Vietnamese, and Chinese shrimp exports away from Europe toward the United States in the late 1990s and early 2000s. I document how those shifting markets have decreased US prices for shrimp significantly compared to those in Europe.

Type
Review Article
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 9 , Issue 2 , April 2010 , pp. 353 - 374
Copyright
Copyright © Peter Debaere 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Jim and van Wincoop, Eric (2003), ‘Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle’, American Economic Review, 93: 170–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagwell, Kyle and Staiger, Robert (1999), ‘An Economic Theory of GATT’, American Economic Review, 89: 215–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Richard (2000), ‘Regulatory Protectionism, Developing Nations, and a Two-Tier World Trade System’, in Collins, Susan and Rodrik, Dani (eds.), Trade Forum, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 237–293.Google Scholar
Barten, Anton and Bettendorf, Leon (1989), ‘Price Formation of Fish – An Application of an Inverse Demand System’, European Economic Review, 33: 1509–1525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D. (1987), ‘Tariffs, the Terms of Trade and National Product Differentiation’, Journal of Policy Modeling, 3: 503–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, Won and Winters, Alan (2002), ‘How Regional Blocs Affect Excluded Countries: The Price Effects of MERCOSUR’, American Economic Review, 92: 889–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corden, Max (1997), Trade Policy and Economic Welfare, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuypers, H. (1998), ‘The Generalised System of Preferences of the European Union, with Special Reference to Asean and Thailand’, CAS Discussion Paper 18, March.Google Scholar
Debaere, Peter (2005), ‘Small Fish-Big Issues: The Effect of Trade Policy on the Global Shrimp Market’, CEPR Working Paper 5254.Google Scholar
EC Prep Monthly Report on Trade Issues in Asia Pacific (various issues).Google Scholar
EUROSTAT (2005), http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int.Google Scholar
Feenstra, Robert (1989), ‘Symmetric Pass-Through of Tariffs and Exchange Rates under Imperfect Competition: An Empirical Test’, Journal of International Economics, 27: 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Pinelopi and Knetter, Michael (1997), ‘Goods Prices and Exchange Rates: What Have We Learned?’, Journal of Economic Literature, 35: 1243–1272.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Pinelopi and Knetter, Michael (1999), ‘Measuring the Intensity of Competition in Export Markets’, Journal of International Economics, 47: 27–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haby, Michael, Miget, Russell, Falconer, Lawrence, and Graham, Gary (2002), ‘A Review of Current Conditions in the Texas Shrimp Industry: An Examination of Contributing Factors, and Suggestions for Remaining Competitive in the Global Shrimp Market’, Working Paper, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Josupeti, Helga (2004), ‘Shrimp Market Access, Tariffs and Regulations’, Conference Presentation, FAO, World Shrimp Markets, October 2004, Madrid.Google Scholar
Kreinin, Mordechai (1961), ‘Effect of Tariff Changes on the Prices and Volume of Imports’, American Economic Review, 51: 310–324.Google Scholar
Maskus, Keith and Wilson, John (eds.)(2001), Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade: Can't it be Done? Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskus, Keith and Wilson, John (eds.)(2001), Quantifying the Impact of Technical Barriers to Trade: Can It Be Done? Univeristy of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mclaren, John (2000), ‘Comments and Discussion’, in Collins, Susan and Rodrik, Dani (eds.), Trade Forum, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, pp. 281–285.Google Scholar
Mundell, Robert (1964), ‘Tariff Preferences and the Terms of Trade’, Manchester School Economic Social Studies, 32: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrimp Media Monitoring (various issues), http://www.enaca.org.Google Scholar
OECD (2005), On-line library, http://new.sourceOECD.org.Google Scholar
Romalis, John (2005), ‘NAFTA's and CUFSTA's impact on International Trade’, NBER WP 11059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TARIC database (2005), http://europa.eu.int/comm.Google Scholar
United States International Trade Commission (2005), http://dataweb.usitc.gov.Google Scholar
Viner, J. (1950), The Customs Union Issue, New York: Carnegie Endowment.Google Scholar
Wall Street Journal (2004), ‘Catch of the Day: Battle over Shrimp’, June.Google Scholar