Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qlrfm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T03:39:47.399Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Liberalizing International Trade after Doha: Multilateral, Plurilateral, Regional and Unilateral Initiatives by David A. Gantz New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2014

Raj Bhala  and
Matthew Cooper
Raj Bhala
Affiliation:
University of Kansas School of Law, USA
Matthew Cooper
Affiliation:
University of Kansas School of Law, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
World Trade Review , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , October 2014 , pp. 721 - 724
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Mike Moore (2003), A World Without Walls: Freedom, Development, Free Trade and Global Governance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 377 pages.

2 See Bhala, Raj (2011), ‘Poverty, Islamist Extremism, and the Debacle of Doha Round Counter-Terrorism: Part One of a Trilogy – Agricultural Tariffs and Subsidies’, University of Saint Thomas Law Journal, 9(1): 5–160Google Scholar; (2011), ‘Poverty, Islamist Extremism, and the Debacle of Doha Round Counter-Terrorism: Part Two of a Trilogy – Non-Agricultural Market Access and Services Trade’, Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 44(1 and 2): 1–81; (2012), ‘Poverty, Islamist Extremism, and the Debacle of Doha Round Counter-Terrorism: Part Three of a Trilogy – Trade Remedies and Facilitation’, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, 40(1–3): 237–320.