Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-jwnkl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T18:20:47.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does High Income Promote Democracy?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2011

John B. Londregan  and
Keith T. Poole
John B. Londregan
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles
Keith T. Poole
Affiliation:
Carnegie-Mellon University
Get access

Abstract

The authors construct a statistical model with which to test whether the regularity that democracy is more commonly found among wealthy countries stems from a democratizing effect of high income or is due entirely to other factors, such as the historical context, various features of the institutional setting, and simultaneity with the process of leadership change. Even after correcting for these many other influences, the democratizing effect of income remains as a statistically significant factor promoting the emergence of democratic political institutions. The authors go on to find that leaders' risks of losing power rise during their time in office and that these risks are higher in more democratic countries.

The authors confirm the finding by Burkhart and Lewis-Beck that the democracy-promoting effect of income is stronger among the European countries. They suggest that high income has a more powerful democratizing effect among the Southern European countries because it interacts with pressure from major trading partners to democratize. This suggests a revaluation of policies designed to foster the replacement of authoritarian regimes by democratic ones through free trade.

Type
Research Article
Information
World Politics , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , October 1996 , pp. 1 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lipset, Seymour Martin, “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy,” American Political Science Review 53 (March 1959)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cutright, Phillips, “National Political Development: Social and Economic Correlates,” in Polsby, Nelson W., Dentler, Robert A., and Smith, Paul A., eds. Politics and Social Life: An Introduction to Political Behavior (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1963)Google Scholar; Dahl, Robert A., Polyarchy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Burkhart, Ross E. and Lewis-Beck, Michael S., “The Economic Development Thesis,” American Political Science Review 88 (December 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Przeworski, Adam et al. “What Makes Democracies Endure?” Journal of Democracy 7 (January 1996)Google Scholar.

2 Burkhart and Lewis-Beck (fn. 1).

3 Linz, Juan, The Breakdown ofDemocratic Regimes: Crisis, Breakdown, andReequilibration (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1978)Google Scholar.

4 King, Gary et al. ., “A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies,” Amer-icanJournal ofPolitical Science 34 (August 1990)Google Scholar.

5 Bienen, Henry and Walle, Nicolas van de, Of Time and Power (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar.

6 Erikson, Robert, “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote,” American Political Science Review 83 (June 1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lewis-Beck, Michael S. and Rice, Tom W., “Forecasting Presidential Elections: A Comparison of Naive Models,” Political Behavior 6, no. 1 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Vanhanen, Tatu The Emergence ofDemocracy (Helsinki: Societas Scientiarium Fennica, 1984)Google Scholar; idem; The Process ofDemocratization (New York: Crane Russak, 1990)Google Scholar.

8 Bollen, Kenneth A., “Political Democracy: Conceptual and Measurement Traps,” in Inkeles, Alex, ed., On Measuring Democracy (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1991)Google Scholar.

9 Upset (fn. 1).

10 Bollen (fn. 8).

11 Dahl (fn. 1).

12 Bollen (fn. 8).

13 Raymond Duncan Gastil “The Comparative Survey of Freedom: Experiences and Suggestions,” in Inkeles (fn. 8).

14 Ted R. Gurr Polity II: Political Structures and Regime Change, 1800–1986 (Computer File 9263 ) (Ann Arbor, Mich.: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research, 1990).

15 Vanhanen (fn. 7,1990).

16 Gastil (fn. 13).

17 Poe, Steven C. and Tate, C. Neal, “Repression of Human Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s: A Global Analysis,” American Political Science Review 88 (December 1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

18 Michael Coppedge and Wolfgang H. Reinicke “Measuring Polyarchy,” in Inkeles (fn. 8).

19 Bollen (fn. 8).

20 Pindyck, Robert S. and Rubenfeld, Daniel L., Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1991)Google Scholar.

21 Bienen and van de Walle (fn. 5).

22 Ibid.

23 Kingetal.(fn.4).

24 Ibid.

25 Linz (fn. 3); Shugart, Matthew Soberg and Carey, John M., Presidents andAssemblies: Constitu-tionalDesign andElectoral Dynamics (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Summers, Robert and Heston, Alan, “The Penn World Table (Mark5): An Expanded Set of International Comparisons, 1950–1988,” QuarterlyJournal ofEconomics 106 (May 1991)Google Scholar.

27 Londregan, John, Bienen, Henry, and Walle, Nicolas van de, “Ethnicity and Leadership Succession in Africa” International Studies Quarterly 39 (March 1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Bruk, S.I. and Apenchenko, V.S.. “Ethnic Composition of the World's Peoples,” in Atlas of the World's Peoples (Moscow: Institute of Ethnography, 1964)Google Scholar.

29 Londregan, Bienen, and van de Walle (fn. 27).

30 Burkhart and Lewis-Beck (fn. 1).

31 Lipset (fn. 1).

32 Bermeo, Nancy, “Redemocratization and Transition Elections,” Comparative Politics 19 (January 1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Rojo, Luís Angel, “Panorama economico,” reprinted in Hombravella, Jacinto, ed., Trece economis-tas espanoles (Barcelona: Okos-tau, 1975)Google Scholar; Carr, Raymond and Fusi, Juan Pablo, Spain: Dictatorship to Democracy (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1981)Google Scholar; Bermeo, Nancy and Garcia-Duran, Jose, “Spain: Dual Transition Implemented by Two Parties,” in Haggard, Stephan and Webb, Steven B., eds., Voting for Reform: Democracy, PoliticalLiberalization andEconomicAdjustment (New York: Oxford University Press, 1994)Google Scholar.

34 King et al. (fn. 4).

35 See, for example, Erikson (fn. 6); or Lewis-Beck and Rice (fn. 6).

36 Londregan, John B. and Poole, Keith T., “Poverty, the Coup Trap, and the Seizure of Executive Power,” World Politics 42 (January 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.