Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-56f9d74cfd-89lq7 Total loading time: 0.399 Render date: 2022-06-25T05:59:28.030Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Tutelage and Regime Survival in Regional Organizations' Democracy Protection

The Case of MERCOSUR and UNASUR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2018

Extract

Why do states adopt binding and enforceable democracy clauses at the regional level, thereby permitting neighboring states to monitor and potentially sanction their breaches of democracy? To answer this question, the authors test a set of hypotheses in two South American intergovernmental regional organizations, MERCOSUR and UNASUR. Following the epistemological and methodological requirements of process-tracing analysis, the authors conducted thirty-six interviews with top-level policymakers and decision makers who were responsible for the design and enforcement of the Protocol of Ushuaia (MERCOSUR), the Protocol of Montevideo (MERCOSUR), and the Protocol of Georgetown (UNASUR). The authors argue that actors formalize these provisions in response to threats to regime survival. Unlike international organizations for the protection of human rights, which rely on the delegation of power to institutions such as supra-state courts, democracy clauses are intergovernmental instruments whose enforcement relies on states’ capabilities. Because of this, the perceptions of governments regarding their own stability and their expectations regarding the future enforcement of the clauses against their own country are causally linked to the decision to support the adoption of the clauses. Thus, governments that perceive themselves as stable democracies or expect that they are too big to be sanctioned support the adoption of democracy clauses because these clauses are functional for others. Conversely, governments that perceive themselves as unstable democracies support the adoption of democracy clauses as functional for themselves. The authors contend that any such asymmetry of self-perceptions and expectations, together with regime protection, explain the move toward the formalization of clauses for the protection of democracy in member states within MERCOSUR and UNASUR.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of Princeton University 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abreu, Sergio. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 24.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2012. “Comparative Regionalism: A Field Whose Time Has Come?International Spectator 47, no. 1: 315. doi: 10.1080/03932729.2012.655004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrosio, Thomas. 2008. “Catching the ‘Shanghai Spirit’: How the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Promotes Authoritarian Norms in Central Asia.Europe-Asia Studies 60, no. 8: 1321–44. doi: 10.1080/09668130802292143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amorim, Celso. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, July 24.Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand. 2005. “Human Rights and Democracy Clauses in the EU's International Agreements.” European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Directorate B, Policy Department. DGExPo/B/PolDep/Study/2005/06. At http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2004_2009/documents/nt/584/584520/584520en.pdf, accessed on April 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Bartels, Lorand. 2008. “The Application of Human Rights Conditionality in the EU's Bilateral Trade Agreements and Other Trade Arrangements with Third Countries.” European Parliament, Directorate-General for External Policies of the Union, Policy Department External Policies. EXPO-B-INTA-2008-57. At http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/etudes/join/2008/406991/EXPO-INTA_ET(2008)406991_EN.pdf, accessed on April 12, 2018.Google Scholar
Bassols, Raimundo. 2016. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Madrid, Spain, March 31.Google Scholar
Beach, Derek, and Pedersen, Rasmus Brun. 2013. Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Andrew, and Checkel, Jeffrey T.. 2014. Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boli, John, and Thomas, George M., eds. 1999. Constructing World Culture: International Nongovernmental Organizations Since 1875. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. 2016. “Theorizing Regionalism: Cooperation, Integration, and Governance.” In Tanja A. Börzel and Thomas Risse, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and Risse, Thomas. 2012. “From Europeanisation to Diffusion: Introduction.West European Politics 35, no. 1: 119. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2012.631310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A., and van Hüllen, Vera. 2015. “Towards a Global Script? Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations.” In Tanja A. Börzel and Vera van Hüllen, eds., Governance Transfer by Regional Organizations: Patching Together a Global Script. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breslin, Shaun, and Higgott, Richard. 2000. “Studying Regions: Learning from the Old, Constructing the New.New Political Economy 5, no. 3: 333–52. doi: 10.1080/713687784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burges, Sean W. 2008. “Consensual Hegemony: Theorizing Brazilian Foreign Policy after the Cold War.International Relations 22, no. 1: 6584. doi: 10.1177/0047117807087243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burges, Sean W. 2007. “Building a Global Southern Coalition: The Competing Approaches of Brazil's Lula and Venezuela's Chávez.Third World Quarterly 28, no. 7: 1343–58. doi: 10.1080/01436590701591911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1999. “Social Construction and Integration.Journal of European Public Policy 6, no. 4: 545–60. doi: 10.1080/135017699343469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Closa, Carlos. 2013. “Institutional Design of Democratic Conditionality in Regional Organizations.” Working Paper, Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, 2013/45. European University Institute. Available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/27462/RSCAS_2013_45.pdf?sequence=1, accessed April 5, 2018.Google Scholar
Closa, Carlos. 2015. “Mainstreaming Regionalism.” Working Paper, Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, 2015/12. European University Institute. Available at http://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/34517/RSCAS_2015_12.pdf, accessed April 5, 2018.Google Scholar
Closa, Carlos, and Casini, Lorenzo. 2016. Comparative Regional Integration: Governance and Legal Models. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Closa, Carlos, and Palestini, Stefano. 2018. Supplementary material for “Tutelage and Regime Survival in Regional Organizations’ Democracy Protection: The Case of mercosur and unasur.” Available at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887118000035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Closa, Carlos, Céspedes, Stefano Palestini, and Ortiz, Pablo Castillo. 2016. “Regional Organisations and Mechanisms for Democracy Protection in Latin America, the Caribbean, and the European Union.” Hamburg, Germany: EU-LAC Foundation. doi: 10.12858/0716en1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coglianese, Cary. 2000. “Globalization and the Design of International Institutions.” In Joseph S. Nye and John D. Donahue, eds., Governance in a Globalizing World. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press: 297318.Google Scholar
Collier, David. 2011. “Understanding Process Tracing.PS: Political Science & Politics 44, no. 4: 823–30. doi: 10.1017/S1049096511001429.Google Scholar
Conde, Roberto. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 23.Google Scholar
Couriel, Alberto. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 23.Google Scholar
Crawford, James. 1994. “Democracy and International Law.British Yearbook of International Law 64, no. 1: 113–33. doi: 10.1093/bybil/64.1.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dabène, Olivier. 2004. “Does Mercosur Still Have a Project?” In Francisco Domínguez and Marcos Guedes de Oliveira, eds., Mercosur: Between Integration and Democracy. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang AG .Google Scholar
Donnelly, Jack. 1986. “International Human Rights: A Regime Analysis.International Organization 40, no. 3: 599642. jstor.org/stable/2706821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donno, Daniela. 2010. “Who Is Punished? Regional Intergovernmental Organizations and the Enforcement of Democratic Norms.International Organization 64, no. 4: 593625. doi: 10.1017/S0020818310000202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duxbury, Alison. 2013. The Participation of States in International Organisations: The Role of Human Rights and Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elkins, Zachary, and Simmons, Beth. 2005. “On Waves, Clusters, and Diffusion: A Conceptual Framework.Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 598, no. 1: 3351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farer, Tom, ed. 1996. Beyond Sovereignty: Collectively Defending Democracy in the Americas. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Simões, Ferreira, José, Antonio. 2016. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Madrid, Spain, January 15.Google Scholar
Fierro, Elena. 2003. The EU's Approach to Human Rights Conditionality in Practice. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change.International Organization 52, no. 4: 887917. doi: 10.1162/002081898550789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemes, Daniel, Nolte, Detlef, and Wehner, Leslie. 2011. “Una Comunidad de Seguridad Regional en Formación: La Unasur y su Consejo de Defensa” [A Regional Security Community in the Making: Unasur and its Defense Council]. Estudios Internacionales 44, no. 170: 105–27. doi: 10.5354/0719-3769.2013.19428.Google Scholar
Fox, Gregory H. 1992. “The Right to Political Participation in International Law.Yale Journal of International Law 17, no. 2: 540607.Google Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1992. “The Emerging Right to Democratic Governance.American Journal of International Law 86, no. 1: 4691. doi: 10.2307/2203138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardini, Gian Luca. 2006. “Government-Business Relations in the Construction of Mercosur.Business and Politics 8, no. 1: 126. doi: 10.2202/1469-3569.1147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Genna, Gaspare M., and Hiroi, Taeko. 2015. Regional Integration and Democratic Conditionality: How Democracy Clauses Help Democratic Consolidation and Deepening. New York, N.Y.: Routledge.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Bennett, Andrew. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom. 2006. “Locking in Democracy: Constitutions, Commitment, and International Law.New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 38, no. 4: 707–60.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Judith. 1998. “International Institutions and Domestic Politics: GATT, WTO, and the Liberalization of International Trade In Anne O. Krueger, ed., The WTO as an International Organization. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press: 133–60.Google Scholar
Gómez Mera, Laura. 2013. Power and Regionalism in Latin America: The Politics of MERCOSUR. Notre Dame, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Bibolini, González, Miguel, Juan. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Asunción, Paraguay, July 22.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2008. “Systematic Process Analysis: When and How to Use It.European Political Science 7, no. 3: 304–17. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren, and Shaw, Carolyn. 2008. “Legalising Norms of Democracy in the Americas.Review of International Studies 34, no. 3: 459–80. At http://www.jstor.org/stable/40212485, accessed April 5, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman, Okla.: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Insulza, José Miguel. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Florence, Italy, October 9.Google Scholar
Jetschke, Anja, and Lenz, Tobias. 2013. “Does Regionalism Diffuse? A New Research Agenda for the Study of Regional Organizations.Journal of European Public Policy 20, no. 4: 626–37. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2012.762186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jupille, Joseph, Mattli, Walter, and Snidal, Duncan. 2013. Institutional Choice and Global Commerce. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koremenos, Barbara, Lipson, Charles, and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “The Rational Design of International Institutions.International Organization 55, no. 4: 761–99. At http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078615, accessed April 5, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, Klaus. 2003. Content Analysis: An Introduction to its Methodology. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Herrera, Lacalle, Alberto, Luis. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 23.Google Scholar
Lacognata, Héctor. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Asunción, Paraguay, July 20.Google Scholar
Lafer, Celso. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Sao Paulo, Brazil, July 28.Google Scholar
Lampreia, Luiz Felipe. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Rio de Janeiro, July 27.Google Scholar
Lara Castro, Jorge. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Asunción, Paraguay, July 21.Google Scholar
Legler, Thomas, and Tieku, Thomas Kwasi. 2010. “What Difference Can a Path Make? Regional Democracy Promotion Regimes in the Americas and Africa.Democratization 17, no. 3: 465–91. doi: 10.1080/13510341003700337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenz, Tobias. 2013. “EU Normative Power and Regionalism: Ideational Diffusion and Its Limits.Cooperation and Conflict 48, no. 2: 211–28. doi: 10.1177/0010836713485539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Barry S. 2006. “A Desultory Defense of Democracy: OA S Resolution 1080 and the Inter-American Democratic Charter.Latin American Politics and Society 48, no. 3: 93123. doi: 10.1111/j.1548-2456.2006.tb00357.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luján, Carlos. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 24.Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés. 2003. “Presidentialism and Mercosur: A Hidden Cause for a Successful Experience.” In Laursen, Finn, ed., Comparative Regional Integration: Theoretical Perspectives. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing: 5373.Google Scholar
Malamud, Andrés. 2005. “Mercosur Turns 15: Between Rising Rhetoric and Declining Achievement.Cambridge Review of International Affairs 18, no. 3: 421–36. doi: 10.1080/09557570500238068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Milner, Helen V.. 1999. “The New Wave of Regionalism.International Organization 53, no. 3: 589627. doi: 10.1162/002081899551002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Peter Rosendorff, B.. 2002. “Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements.International Organization 56, no. 3: 477513. At http://www.jstor.org/stable/3078586, accessed April 5, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Edward D., and Pevehouse, Jon C.. 2006. “Democratization and International Organizations.International Organization 60, no. 1: 137–67. doi: 10.1017/S002081830606005X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marks, Susan. 2011. “What Has Become of the Emerging Right to Democratic Governance?European Journal of International Law 22, no. 2: 507–24. doi: 10.1093/ejil/chr023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melgarejo, Rubén. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Asunción, Paraguay, July 21.Google Scholar
Merke, Federico. 2015. “Neither Balance nor Bandwagon: South American International Society Meets Brazil's Rising Power.International Politics 52, no. 2: 178–92. doi: 10.1057/ip.2014.49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., Boli, John, Thomas, George M., and Ramirez, Francisco O.. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.American Journal of Sociology 103, no. 1: 144–81. doi: 10.1086/231174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, John W., and Rowan, Brian. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.American Journal of Sociology 83, no. 2: 340–63. At http://www.jstor.org/stable/2778293, accessed April 5, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miola, Jeferson. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Brasilia, Brazil, July 30.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ronald B., and Keilbach, Patricia M.. 2001. “Situation Structure and Institutional Design: Reciprocity, Coercion, and Exchange.International Organization 55, no. 4: 891917. doi: 10.1162/002081801317193637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2000. “The Origins of Human Rights Regimes: Democratic Delegation in Postwar Europe.International Organization 54, no. 2: 217–52. doi: 10.1162/002081800551163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moravcsik, Andrew. 2010. “Active Citation: A Precondition for Replicable Qualitative Research.PS: Political Science & Politics 43, no. 1: 2935. doi: 10.1017/S1049096510990781.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe C., and Whitehead, Laurence. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Ons, Álvaro. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 25.Google Scholar
Ovodenko, Alexander, and Keohane, Robert O.. 2012. “Institutional Diffusion in International Environmental Affairs.International Affairs 88, no. 3: 523–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01087.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padrón, Álvaro. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 25.Google Scholar
Palestini, Stefano, and Agostinis, Giovanni. 2015. “Constructing Regionalism in South America: The Cases of Sectoral Cooperation on Transport Infrastructure and Energy.Journal of International Relations and Development 21, no. 1: 129. doi: 10.1057/jird.2015.15.Google Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002a. “With a Little Help from My Friends? Regional Organizations and the Consolidation of Democracy.American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 3: 611–26. doi: 10.2307/3088403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2002b. “Democracy from the Outside-In? International Organizations and Democratization.International Organization 56, no. 3: 515–49. doi: 10.1162/002081802760199872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2005. Democracy from Above: Regional Organizations and Democratization. New York, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511491078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pevehouse, Jon C. 2016. “Regional Human Rights and Democracy Governance.” In Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinheiro Guimarães, Samuel. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Brasilia, Brazil, July 31.Google Scholar
Rachid, Leila. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Asunción, Montevideo, July 21.Google Scholar
Raimondi, Guillermo. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Buenos Aires, Argentina, March 26.Google Scholar
Ramírez Lezcano, Rubén. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Buenos Aires, Argentina, March 27. Ribeiro Hoffmann, Andrea. 2016. “As Organizações Regionais e a Promoção e Proteção da Democracia: Reflexões a Partir das Práticas de Intervenção Democrática na América do Sul” [Regional Organization and the Promotion and Protection of Democracy: Reflections from the Cases of Democratic Intervention in South America]. Caderno CRH 29, no. 3: 4757.Google Scholar
Ribeiro Hoffmann, Andrea, and van der Vleuten, Anna. 2007. Closing or Widening the Gap? Legitimacy and Democracy in Regional Integration Organizations. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
Rich, Roland. 2001. “Bringing Democracy into International Law.Journal of Democracy 12, no. 3: 2034. doi: 10.1353/jod.2001.0056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riggirozzi, Pía, and Tussie, Diana, eds. 2012. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America. New York, N.Y.: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2694-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. “‘Let's Argue!’: Communicative Action in World Politics.International Organization 54, 1: 139. doi: 10.1162/002081800551109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2016. “Explaining Regionalism: Diffusion, Translation, and Adaptation.” In Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Regionalism. New York, N.Y: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruiz Díaz Balbuena, Hugo. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Asunción, Paraguay, July 22.Google Scholar
Salomone, Patricia. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Buenos Aires, Argentina, March 26.Google Scholar
Sanahuja, José Antonio. 2012. “Post-Liberal Regionalism in South America: The Case of UNA SUR.” Working Paper, Robert Schuman Center for Advanced Studies, 2012/05. European University Institute. At http://hdl.handle.net/1814/20394, accessed April 5, 2018.Google Scholar
Sanguinetti, Julio Maria. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 24.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2005. “Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe.International Organization 59, no. 4: 827–60. doi: 10.1017/S0020818305050290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank, Engert, Stefan, and Knobel, Heiko. 2003. “Costs, Commitment and Compliance: The Impact of EU Democratic Conditionality on Latvia, Slovakia and Turkey.Journal of Common Market Studies 41, no. 3: 495518. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank, and Garrett, Geoffrey. 2006. “Introduction: The International Diffusion of Liberalism.International Organization 60, no. 4: 781810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tansey, Oisin. 2007. “Process Tracing and Elite Interviewing: A Case for Non-Probability Sampling.PS: Political Science & Politics 40, no. 4: 765–72. doi: 10.1017/S1049096507071211.Google Scholar
Teixeira, Carlos Gustavo Poggio. 2012. Brazil, the United States, and the South American Sub-System: Regional Politics and the Absent Empire. Lanham, Md.: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Torfason, Magnus Thor, and Ingram, Paul. 2010. “The Global Rise of Democracy: A Network Account.American Sociological Review 75, no. 3: 355–77. doi: 10.1177/0003122410372230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valdés, Juan Gabriel. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Florence, Italy, October 13.Google Scholar
Vanderhill, Rachel. 2012. Promoting Authoritarianism Abroad. Boulder, Col.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
van der Vleuten, Anna, and Hoffmann, Andrea Ribeiro. 2010. “Explaining the Enforcement of Democracy by Regional Organizations: Comparing EU, Mercosur and SADC .Journal of Common Market Studies 48, no. 3: 737–58. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02071.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Volonté, Alberto. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Montevideo, Uruguay, March 23.Google Scholar
von Soest, Christian. 2015. “Democracy Prevention: The International Collaboration of Authoritarian Regimes.European Journal of Political Research 54, no. 4: 623–38. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasmosy, Juan Carlos. 2015. Interviewed by Carlos Closa, Asunción, Paraguay, July 22.Google Scholar
Wehner, Leslie, and Nolte, Detlef. 2013. “UNA SUR and Regional Security in South America.” In Aris, Stephen and Wenger, Andreas, eds., Regional Organisations and Security: Conceptions and Practices. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wetzel, Anne, and Orbie, Jan, eds. 2015. The Substance of EU Democracy Promotion: Concepts and Cases. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence, ed. 2001. The International Dimensions of Democratization: Europe and the Americas. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitehead, Laurence, 2014. “Antidemocracy Promotion: Four Strategies in Search of a Framework.Taiwan Journal of Democracy 10, no. 2: 124.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Closa and Palestini supplementary material

Closa and Palestini supplementary material 1

Download Closa and Palestini supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 2 MB
Supplementary material: File

Closa and Palestini supplementary material

Closa and Palestini supplementary material 2

Download Closa and Palestini supplementary material(File)
File 20 KB
18
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Tutelage and Regime Survival in Regional Organizations' Democracy Protection
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Tutelage and Regime Survival in Regional Organizations' Democracy Protection
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Tutelage and Regime Survival in Regional Organizations' Democracy Protection
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *