Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T23:48:15.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting the Toxicity of Phenoxy Herbicides to Field Bindweed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

A. F. Wiese
Affiliation:
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, South-western Great Plains Field Station, Bushland, Texas
H. E. Rea
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Texas A & M College, College Station, Texas
Get access

Abstract

In semi-arid areas, good control of field bindweed with 1 lb/A of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4–D) will occur if there is at least 1.5 inches of available soil moisture when runners are 6 to 10 inches long. Under these conditions carbohydrates are high in the leaves and low in the roots. Analysis of rainfall records from Amarillo, Texas indicates that soil moisture conditions during May will be favorable for good bindweed control with 2,4–D 54% of the time.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1962 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bakke, A. L., and Gaessler, W. G. 1944. Relation of cultivation to depletion of root reserves in European bindweed at different soil horizons. Jour. Agr. Res. 69:137147.Google Scholar
2. Barr, C. G. 1940. Organic reserves in the roots of bindweed. J. Agr. Res. 60:391413.Google Scholar
3. Crafts, A. S. 1956. Absorption and translocation of 2,4–D by wild morning-glory. Hilgardia 26:335365.Google Scholar
4. Derscheid, L. A. 1947. Results of uniform experiments with 2,4–D on bindweed. Proc. NCWCC 4:176177.Google Scholar
5. Fisher, C. E., Meadors, C. H., and Behrens, R. 1956. Some factors that influence the effectiveness of 2,4,5–trichlorophenoxyacetic acid in killing mesquite. Weeds 4:139147.Google Scholar
6. Grigsby, B. H. 1956. North Central States battling deeprooted weeds. Agr. and Food Chem. 4:310311.Google Scholar
7. Hamner, C. L., and Tukey, H. B. 1944. The herbicidal action of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic and 2,4,5–trichlorophenoxyacetic acid on bindweed. Science 100:154155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Mitchell, J. W., and Brown, J. W. 1946. Movement of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid stimulus and its relation to the translocation of organic food materials in plants. Bot. Gaz. 107:393407.Google Scholar
9. Phillips, W. M., and Timmons, F. L. 1954. Bindweed—how to control it. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 366.Google Scholar
10. Phillips, W. M. 1958. Field bindweed. Proc. NCWCC 15:53.Google Scholar
11. Russ, O. G., and Anderson, L. E. 1960. Field bindweed control by combinations of cropping, cultivation, and 2,4–D. Weeds 8:397401.Google Scholar
12. Seely, C. I. 1952. Controlling perennial weeds with tillage. Idaho Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 288.Google Scholar
13. Shaffer, P. A., and Somogyi, M. 1933. Copper-iodometric reagents for sugar determination. T. Biol. Chem. 100:695713.Google Scholar
14. Smith, F. G., Hamner, C. L., and Carlson, R. F. 1947. Changes in food reserves and respiratory capacity of bindweed tissues accompanying herbicidal action of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Plant Physiol. 22:5865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Timmons, F. L. 1941. Results of bindweed control experiments at Fort Hays Branch Station, Hays, Kansas, 1935 to 1940. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 296.Google Scholar
16. Tukey, H. B., Hamner, C. L., and Imhoff, Barbara. 1945. Histological changes in bindweed and sow thistle following applications of 2,4–dichlorophenoxyacetic acid in herbicidal concentrations. Bot. Gaz. 107:6273.Google Scholar
17. Weinman, H. 1947. Determination of total available carbohydrates in plants. Plant Physiol. 22:279290.Google Scholar
18. Wiese, A. F., and Rea, H. E. 1954. Herbicidal screening study for field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) control. Res. Rept. NCWCC 11:15.Google Scholar
19. Wiese, A. F., and Rea, H. E. 1955. Bindweed control in the Panhandle of Texas. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 802.Google Scholar
20. Wiese, A. F., and Rea, H. E. 1959. Bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) control and seedling emergence as affected by tillage, 2,4–D and competitive crops. Agron J. 51:672675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Woestemeyer, V. W. 1950. Summary field bindweed investigations. Res. Rept. NCWCC 7:27.Google Scholar