Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:26:41.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dissipation of Diquat and Paraquat, and Effects on Aquatic Weeds and Fish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. R. Yeo
R. R. Yeo*
Affiliation:
Crops Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, and Department of Botany, University of California, Davis, California
Get access

Abstract

Rates of dissipation of 6,7-dihydrodipyrido [1,2-a:2’,1′-c] = pyrazidiinium salt (diquat) and 1,1′dimethyl-4,4′-dipyridinium salt (paraquat) in water were studied from 1963 to 1965 at Davis, California. Effects of several environmental factors on dissipation of the herbicides, and herbicidal control of 9 to 14 aquatic weeds and toxicity to three kinds of fish and an Asiatic clam also were investigated.

Small amounts of the herbicides were still detectable in water at the end of 12 days. In reservoirs, diquat applied at 1000 ppbw or less dissipated to 9 ppbw or less. In growth pools, a concentration of 4000 ppbw dissipated to between 600 and 900 ppbw. Dissipation of paraquat in reservoirs was slower than diquat and exhibited unpredictable fluctuations in amounts present. When 250 to 2500 ppbw of paraquat were applied in reservoirs, 0 to 180 ppbw remained after 13 days. In growth pools, 80 to 300 ppbw of paraquat persisted on the 12th day after applications of 1000 to 3000 ppbw.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , January 1967 , pp. 42 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © 1967 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Blackburn, R. D. 1963. Evaluating herbicides against aquatic weeds. Weeds 11:21–24.Google Scholar
2. Blackburn, R. D., Seaman, D. E., and Weldon, L. W. 1961. A preliminary note on the control of southern naiad in south Florida drainage and irrigation channels. Proc. SWC 14:302–308.Google Scholar
3. Blackburn, R. D. and Weldon, L. W. 1962. Control of southern naiad (Najas guadalupensis) and other submersed weeds in south Florida irrigation and drainage channels. Proc. SWC 15:254–255.Google Scholar
4. Blackburn, R. D. and Weldon, L. W. 1964. Control of southern naiad in Florida drainage and irrigation channels. Weeds 12:295–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Bruns, V. F., Yeo, R. R., and Arle, H. F. Tolerance of certain crops of several aquatic herbicides in irrigation water. Agr. Res. Ser., USDA, Tech. Bull. No. 1299. 22 pp.Google Scholar
6. Funderburk, H. H. Jr., and Lawrence, J. M. 1963. A sensitive method for determination of low concentrations of diquat and paraquat. Nature 199:1011–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Guse, L. R. 1961. Aquatic weed control research in Indiana. Res. Rept. NCWCC 18:102.Google Scholar
8. Hiltibran, R. C. 1961. Aquatic weed control research in central Illinois. NCWCC Res. Rept. 18:102–103.Google Scholar
9. Hiltibran, R. C. 1964. The effects of diquat on aquatic plants. WSA Abstr. p. 105–106.Google Scholar
10. Hiltibran, R. C. 1965. The effect of diquat on aquatic plants in central Illinois. Weeds 13:71–72.Google Scholar
11. Holtz, W. 1963. Chemical weed control in ditches: Trials on the control of submerged plants. Dtsch. Arbeitsbesprechung uber Fragen der Unkrautbiologie u. –bekampfung, Hohenheim. 4 pp.Google Scholar
12. Lawrence, J. M. and Funderburk, H. H. Jr. 1964. Herbicides on submersed aquatic weeds and determinations of their residues. WSA Abstr. p. 104–105.Google Scholar
13. Renard, C. 1963. The use of diquat and paraquat to control aquatic plants. Conf. Com. Franc. Mauv. Herbes (Columa) Soc. Protect. Agr. 9 pp.Google Scholar
14. Selman, F. L. and Upchurch, R. P. 1963. The influence of pH on the activity of herbicides. Proc. SWC 16:392.Google Scholar
15. Tatum, W. M. and Blackburn, R. D. 1962. Preliminary study of the effects of diquat on the natural bottom fauna and plankton in two subtropical ponds. Proc. S. E. Assn. Game and Fish Comm. 13 pp.Google Scholar
16. Whitley, J. R. 1964. The use of diquat and paraquat in aquatic weed control. WSA Abstr. p. 106.Google Scholar