Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-sjtt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T06:48:14.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Control of Roadside Weeds and Brush

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

E. P. Sylwester*
Affiliation:
Extension Service, College of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa
Get access

Extract

The control of roadside weeds and brush has always been a major problem of roadside construction and maintenance engineers. People charged with the responsibility of keeping our highways, county, trunk and local roads free of weeds and brush have heretofore found the control of unsightly weeds and brush a major and laborious problem and expense. For the control of many annuals such as hemp, giant ragweed, small ragweed, daisy fleabane, etc., a very thorough, systematic mowing program, coupled with the establishment of a heavy grass cover has in many instances sufficed to keep weed growth down to a minimum. However, for the control of such roadside weeds as Canada thistle, perennial sow thistle, poison ivy, etc., as well as for the control of all types of brushy growth, the mere mowing and laborious cutting of such plants has not resulted in eradication. The mowing of perennial weeds and brush is like “picking apples off a tree” — such picking does not kill the tree. Furthermore, programs of control involving brush have had to be repeated every two or three years at terrific expense to the tax payer. Laborious mowing and hand cutting is followed quickly by regrowth, which in a year or so is as bad or worse as the original stand which was removed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , October 1951 , pp. 17 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © 1951 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)