Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-9q27g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T06:29:47.284Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on Tests of Herbicide Mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Donald P. Gowing*
Affiliation:
Pineapple Research Institute of Hawaii
Get access

Extract

One of the important areas of current herbicide research is the investigation of herbicide mixtures. It is a common field experience that use of a single material—even of a “broad-spectrum” herbicide—exerts a selective pressure on the field population because of differential effectiveness on the various weed species. There is some evidence that a part of this derives from purely mechanical considerations (e.g., the spraying system in use may not reach plants of different growth habit equally well), but in any case the weed control program often appears to decrease in effectiveness after several seasons. In addition to favoring the survival of particular species, the non-eradicatory application of even a highly efficient chemical apparently aids in the establishment of populations of individuals which are physiologically most tolerant of the herbicide used. It will probably be granted, then, that the use of mixtures of toxicants will provide more effective control of populations of mixed weed species, and may also reduce the numbers of individuals and species exceptionally tolerant of the herbicide program, especially when the toxicants kill by affecting different physiological processes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1960 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Benett-Clark, T. A. Kinetics of auxin-induced growth. In Chemistry and mode of action of plant growth-substances, pp. 310312. (Wain, R. and Wightman, F. Ed.) Academic Press, New York. 1956.Google Scholar
2. Bliss, C. I. The calculation of the dosage-mortality curve. Ann. Appl. Biol. 22:134176. 1935.Google Scholar
3. Bliss, C. I. Some principles of bioassay. Am. Scientist 45:449466. 1957.Google Scholar
4. Burchfield, H. P., and Wilcoxon, F. Comparison of dosage-response and time-response methods for assessing the joint action of anti-metabolites. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 18:7982. 1954.Google Scholar
5. Crafts, A. S. The toxicity of sodium arsenite and sodium chlorate in four California soils. Hilgardia 9:461498. 1935.Google Scholar
6. Crafts, A. S., and Cleary, C. W. Toxicity of arsenic, borax, chlorate, and their combinations in three California soils. Hilgardia 10:401–314. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Crafts, A. S., and Raynor, R. N. The herbicidal properties of boron compounds. Hilgardia 10:343374. 1936.Google Scholar
8. Crafts, A. S., and Reiber, H. G. Studies on the activation of herbicides. Hilgardia 16:485500. 1945.Google Scholar
9. Eadie, G. S. On the evaluation of the constants Vm and Km in enzyme reactions. Science 116:688. 1952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10. Epstein, E., and Hagen, C. E. A kinetic study of the absorption of alkali cations by barley roots. Plant Phys. 27:457474. 1952.Google Scholar
11. Frans, R. E., Lind, E. E., and Loomis, W. E. Kinetics of growth inhibition by herbicides. Plant Phys. 32:301307. 1957.Google Scholar
12. Friedenwald, J. S., and Maengwyn-Davies, G. D. Elementary kinetic theory of enzymatic activity. In A symposium on the mechanism of enzyme action. (McElroy, W. D. and Glass, B. Ed.) pp. 154218. The Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore. 1954.Google Scholar
13. Gowing, D. P. A method of comparing herbicides and assessing herbicide mixtures at the screening level. Weeds 7:6676. 1959.Google Scholar
14. Hofstee, B. H. J. On the evaluation of the constants Vm and Km in enzyme reactions. Science 116:329331. 1952.Google Scholar
15. Horsfall, J. G. In Fungicides and their action. Chap. IV. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, Mass. 1945.Google Scholar
16. Lineweaver, H., and Burk, D. The determination of enzyme dissociation constants. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 56:658666. 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. McRae, D. E., Foster, R. J., and Bonner, J. Kinetics of auxin interaction. Plant Phys. 28:343355. 1953.Google Scholar
18. Reiner, J. M. Behavior of enzyme systems, pp. 1317. Burgess Publ. Co., Minn. 1959.Google Scholar
19. Sheets, T. J., and Leonard, O. A. An evaluation of the herbicidal efficiency of combinations of ATA with dalapon, monuron, and several other chemicals. Weeds 6:143151. 1958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Sher, I. H. Two methods for obtaining least square lines. Science 123:102104. 1956.Google Scholar
21. Stone, J. D., and Stahler, L. M. An evaluation of borate and chlorate herbicides. Agr. Chem. 9:50, 51, 53, 131, 135. 1954.Google Scholar
22. Storrs, E. E., and Burchfield, H. P. Joint action of binary mixtures of insecticides. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. 18:6978. 1954.Google Scholar
23. Westerfeld, W. W. Biological response curves. Science 123:10171019. 1956.Google Scholar