Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T14:22:42.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Fresh Water Storage on the Germination of Certain Weed Seeds: I. White top, Russian knapweed, Canada thistle, morning glory, and poverty weed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

V. F. Bruns
Affiliation:
Division of Weed Investigations, BPISAE, U. S. Departmen of Agriculture
L. W. Rasmussen
Affiliation:
Agronomy Department, Washington State College
Get access

Extract

Water, especially water used for irrigation, has been adjudged for many years an important agent in the dissemination of weed seeds. Egginton and Robbins (7) found a total of 81 different species of weeds in 156 weed seed catches from three different ditches during 1918 and 1919 and determined that the number of weed seeds passing a given point on a ditch which averaged 12 feet in width during a period of 24 hours may reach several millions. Hope (11) analyzed a considerable number of weed seed catches from irrigation channels during 1924 and 1925. He computed that 1,674,030 seeds of 13 different weed species which occurred on the surface and to a depth of 1.57 inches in one 10-foot ditch passed during a 24-hour period on September 2, 1925. Further computations illustrated that the flow of weed seeds would amount to a deposition of 170,800 seeds per acre of land in one 6-inch irrigation. The latter computations were based on the assumption that the seeds were distributed uniformly over the cross section of the ditch at the point of catch.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weeds , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 138 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © 1953 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. Seeds undrowned after 23 years under water. Sci. News Letter 24(646): 131. Aug. 26, 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anonymous. Hardy weed seeds live many years. Sci. News Letter 59(3): 34. Jan. 20, 1951.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. Ancient seeds not viable. Sci. News Letter 59(12): 180. March 24, 1951.Google Scholar
4. Bruns, V. F. The buoyancy of certain noxious weed seeds. Annual Report, Weed Investigations, Irr. Exp. Sta., Prosser, Wash. 1949. (Not published).Google Scholar
5. Chepil, W. S. Germination of weed seeds. Scientific Agriculture, 26: 7. July, 1946.Google Scholar
6. Darlington, H. T. The seventy-year period of Dr. Beal's seed viability experiment. Amer. Jour. Bot. 38 (5): 379381. May, 1951.Google Scholar
7. Egginton, G. E., and Robbins, W. W. Irrigation water as a factor in the dissemination of weed seeds. Colo. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bul. 253: 125. June, 1920.Google Scholar
8. Goss, W. L. The vitality of buried seed. Jour. of Agric. Research, 29: 349362. 1924.Google Scholar
9. Goss, W. L. Germination of buried weed seeds. Calif. St. Agric. Dept. Bul. Vol. XXVIII, No. 2: 132135. February, 1939.Google Scholar
10. Harrington, G. T. Use of alternating temperatures in the germination of seeds. Jour. Agr. Research, 23: 295333. 1923.Google Scholar
11. Hope, A. The dissemination of weed seeds by irrigation water in Alberta. Scientific Agriculture, Vol. VII, No. 7: 268276. March, 1927.Google Scholar
12. Mercer, W. H. Effect of submergence on the viability of weed seeds. U. S. Dept. Int., Bur. Recl., Chem. Eng. Lab. Rpt. No. SI–1. Mar. 31, 1952.Google Scholar
13. Rodeins, W. W., Crafts, A. S. and Raynor, R. N. Weed control. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Chapter 11: 2435. 1942.Google Scholar
14. Timmons, F. L. Duration of viability of bindweed seed under field conditions and experimental results in the control of bindweed seedlings. Agr. Jour. Vol. 41, No. 3: 130133. March, 1949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Warington, Katherine. The effect of constant and fluctuating temperature on the germination of weed seeds in arable soil. Jour. of Ecology, Vol. 24, No. 1: 185204. 1936.Google Scholar