Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T08:10:30.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Consultant Perspectives on Weed Management Needs in Arkansas Cotton

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jason K. Norsworthy ,
Kenneth L. Smith ,
Robert C. Scott  and
Edward E. Gbur
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soils, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Kenneth L. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soils, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Robert C. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Crop, Soils, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Edward E. Gbur
Affiliation:
Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jnorswor@uark.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Certified Crop Advisors of Arkansas and members of the Arkansas Crop Consultants Association were surveyed in Fall 2006 through direct mail to assess current weed management practices and needs in cotton from both a research and educational perspective. Consultants reported scouting 162,300 of the possible 473,700 ha of cotton grown in Arkansas. Collectively, glyphosate-resistant and enhanced glyphosate-resistant cultivars were reported grown on 98% of the cotton hectares. Ninety-five percent of the consultants believe the planting of enhanced glyphosate-resistant cultivars will increase over the next 5 yr. All consultants indicated a “moderate” to “high” level of concern with herbicide-resistant weeds in cotton, and 79% of the consultants suspect herbicide resistance in the fields they scout, predominately glyphosate-resistant horseweed. Horseweed, Palmer amaranth, and morningglories were the three most problematic weeds in cotton. A continued focus on resistant weed management was the most frequent research and educational request by consultants.

Keywords

Horseweed, Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq. ERICAmorningglories, Ipomoea sppPalmer amaranth, Amaranthus palmeri S. Wats AMAPAcotton, Gossypium hirsutum L.Weed management survey
Type
Extention/Outreach
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 825 - 831
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Akin, D. S. and Shaw, D. R. 2004. In-season applications of glyphosate for control of redvine (Brunnichia ovata) in glyphosate-resistant soybean. Weed Technol. 18:325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anonymous 2006a. Ignite® 280 SL Herbicide, Bayer Crop Science. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld7AQ013.pdf. Accessed: December 7, 2006.Google Scholar
Anonymous 2006b. Roundup WeatherMax® Herbicide, Monsanto Company. http://www.cdms.net/ldat/ld5UJ029.pdf. Accessed: December 7, 2006.Google Scholar
Branson, J. W., Smith, K. L., and Barrentine, J. L. 2005. Comparison of trifloxysulfuron and pyrithiobac in glyphosate-resistant and bromoxynil-resistant cotton. Weed Technol. 19:404–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clewis, S. B., Wilcut, J. W., and Porterfield, D. 2006. Weed management with S-metolachlor and glyphosate mixtures in glyphosate-resistant strip- and conventional-tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Weed Technol. 20:232–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coble, H. D. 1994. Future directions and needs for weed science research. Weed Technol. 8:410–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L., Askew, S. D., Thomas, W. E., and Wilcut, J. W. 2004. Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol. 18:443–453.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S. 2006. Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technol. 20:277–281.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Carlson, D. S., and York, A. C. 2005. Pre-plant control of cutleaf eveningprimrose (Oenothera laciniata Hill) and wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.) in conservation tillage cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J. Cotton Sci. 9:223–228.Google Scholar
Culpepper, A. S., Webster, T. M., York, A. C., Barrentine, R. M., and Mullinix, B. G. Jr. 2004. Glyphosate/MSMA mixtures in glyphosate-resistant cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). J. Cotton Sci. 8:124–129.Google Scholar
Dauer, J. T., Mortensen, D. A., and Humston, R. 2006. Controlled experiments to predict horseweed (Conyza canadensis) dispersal distances. Weed Sci. 54:484–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairbanks, D. E., Reynolds, D. B., Griffin, J. L., Jordan, D. L., Corken, C. B., Vidrine, P. R., and Crawford, S. H. 2001. Cotton tolerance and weed control with preplant applications of thifensulfuron plus tribenuron. J. Cotton Sci. 5:259–267.Google Scholar
Griffith, G., Norsworthy, J. K., Oliver, L. R., Scott, R. C., and Smith, K. L. 2007. Glyphosate resistance in a Palmer amaranth population in Arkansas. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 60:82.Google Scholar
Heap, I. A. 2006. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds. http://www.weedscience.org/in.asp. Accessed: November 9, 2006.Google Scholar
Heap, I. and LeBaron, H. 2001. Introduction and overview of resistance. Pages 1–22. in Powles, S.B., Shaner, D.L. eds. Herbicide Resistance and World Grains. CRC Washington, D.C. Google Scholar
Hilgenfeld, K. L., Martin, A. R., Mortensen, D. A., and Mason, S. C. 2004. Weed management in glyphosate resistant soybean: weed emergence patterns in relation to glyphosate timing. Weed Technol. 18:277–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, P., Norsworthy, J. K., Bangarwa, S. K., Malik, M. S., and Oliveira, M. J. 2006. Temporal emergence of Palmer amaranth from a natural seedbank. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 59:177.Google Scholar
Jones, M. A. and Snipes, C. E. Tolerance of transgenic cotton to topical applications of glyphosate. J. Cotton Sci. 1999. 3:19–26.Google Scholar
Llewellyn, R. S., Lindner, R. K., Pannell, D. J., and Powles, S. B. 2002. Resistance and the herbicide resource: perceptions of Western Australian grain growers. Crop Prot. 21:1067–1075.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Berry, M. A. 1991. Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol. 5:460–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, M. C., Barrentine, J. L., and Sparks, O. C. 2003. Weed management programs with trifloxysulfuron (Envoke) in cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:293–294.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Mitchell, P. D., Young, B. G., and Culpepper, A. S. 2005. Proactive versus reactive management of glyphosate-resistant or -tolerant weeds. Weed Technol. 19:924–933.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2000. Acreage. Released June 30, 2000. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/Acre//2000s/2000/Acre-06-30-2000.pdf. Accessed: December 6, 2006.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2006a. Acreage. Released June 30, 2006. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/Acre//2000s/2006/Acre-06-30-2006.pdf. Accessed: December 6, 2006.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2006b. Crop Values 2005 Summary. February 2006. http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/nass/CropValuSu//2000s/2006/CropValuSu-02-15-2006.pdf. Accessed: December 6, 2006.Google Scholar
[NASS] National Agricultural Statistics Service 2007. Arkansas County Data—Crops (Cotton). http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/PullData_US_CNTY.jsp. Accessed: February 23, 2007.Google Scholar
Neve, P., Diggle, A. J., Smith, F. P., and Powles, S. B. 2003a. Simulating evolution of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum I: population biology of a rare resistant trait. Weed Res. 43:404–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neve, P., Diggle, A. J., Smith, F. P., and Powles, S. B. 2003b. Simulating evolution of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum I: past, present and future glyphosate use in Australian cropping. Weed Res. 43:418–427.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Burgos, N. R., and Oliver, L. R. 2001. Differences in weed tolerance to glyphosate involve different mechanisms. Weed Technol. 15:725–731.Google Scholar
Norsworthy, J. K., Smith, K. L., Scott, R. C., and McClelland, M. R. 2007. Spread and management of glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Arkansas. Proc. Beltwide Cotton Conf. In press .Google Scholar
Powles, S. B. and Preston, C. 2006. Evolved glyphosate resistance in plants: biochemical and genetic basis of resistance. Weed Technol. 20:282–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rankins, A. Jr., Byrd, J. D. Jr., Mask, D. B., Barnett, J. W., and Gerard, P. D. 2005. Survey of soybean weeds in Mississippi. Weed Technol. 19:492–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thill, D. C. and Mallory-Smith, C. A. 1997. The nature and consequence of weed spread in cropping systems. Weed Sci. 45:337–342.Google Scholar
[USDA] United States Department of Agriculture 2006. Cotton Varieties Planted—2006 Crop. Agricultural Marketing Service. 12. http://www.ams.usda.gov/cottonrpts/MNPDF/mp_cn833.PDF. Accessed: December 10, 2006.Google Scholar
W.K. Vencill, ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS Weed Science Society of America. 493.Google Scholar
Webster, T. M. and MacDonald, G. E. 2001. A survey of weeds in various crops in Georgia. Weed Technol. 15:771–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, T. M. and Coble, H. D. 1997. Changes in the weed species composition of the southern United States: 1974 to 1995. Weed Technol. 11:308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, B. G. 2006. Changes in herbicide use patterns and production practices resulting from glyphosate-resistant crops. Weed Technol. 20:301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar