Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-hgkh8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T01:07:14.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Zinc Antagonizes Glyphosate Efficacy on Yellow Nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

H. F. Abouziena*
Affiliation:
Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
R. A. Elmergawi
Affiliation:
Botany Department, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
S. Sharma
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agriculture Science, Horticultural Science Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
A. A. Omar
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agriculture Science, Horticultural Science Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299 Faculty of Agriculture, Biochemistry Department, Zagazig University, Egypt
M. Singh
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agriculture Science, Horticultural Science Department, Citrus Research and Education Center, 700 Experiment Station Road, Lake Alfred, FL 33850-2299
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: abouzainah@yahoo.com

Abstract

Growers of glyphosate-resistant crops apply micronutrients tank-mixed with glyphosate to save time and production costs. Therefore, effect of zinc (Zn), as Zn sulfate, on absorption, translocation, and efficacy of glyphosate on yellow nutsedge was investigated. Glyphosate at 850 g ae ha−1 provided 90% yellow nutsedge control at 5 wk after treatment (WAT). Presence of Zn at 1,000 ppmw in the glyphosate spray solution reduced yellow nutsedge control to 24 and 8%, 3 and 5 WAT, respectively. Yellow nutsedge control decreased with increasing Zn level (500 to 2,000 ppmw) in the spray solution. Yellow nutsedge treated with higher rates of Zn tank-mixed with glyphosate produced more tubers and tillers per plant than untreated plants. An abrupt decrease in absorption and translocation of 14C–glyphosate occurred between 500 and 1,000 ppmw Zn. The antagonistic effect of Zn on glyphosate depended mainly on reduced absorption and translocation of 14C–glyphosate within treated tissues. Less than 10% of applied 14C–glyphosate was absorbed when glyphosate was mixed with 1,000, 2,000, or 4,000 ppmw Zn as compared with 85% absorption for glyphosate alone. These treatments inhibited > 90% of 14C–glyphosate translocation out of the treated leaf and > 50% of tuber translocation relative to glyphosate alone. Results indicate that micronutrients containing Zn are not suitable for tank-mixing with glyphosate.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Barrett, K. A. and McBride, M. B. 2006. Trace element mobilization in soils by glyphosate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 70:18821888.Google Scholar
Bernards, M. L., Thelen, K. D., Penner, D., Muthukumaran, R. B., and McCracken, J. L. 2005. Glyphosate interaction with manganese in tank-mixtures and its effect on glyphosate absorption and translocation. Weed Sci. 53:787794.Google Scholar
Eker, S., Ozturk, L., Yazici, A., Erenoglu, B., Romheld, V., and Cakmak, I. 2006. Foliar-applied glyphosate substantially reduced uptake and transport of iron and manganese in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 54:1001910025.Google Scholar
El-Khawaga, A. S. 2007. Reduction in fruit cracking in manfaluty pomegranate following a foliar application with paclobutrazol and zinc sulphate. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 3:837840.Google Scholar
Feng, P. C. C., Chiu, T., and Sammons, R. D. 2003. Glyphosate efficacy is contributed by its tissue concentration and sensitivity in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 77:8391.Google Scholar
Frans, R., Talbert, R., and Marx, D. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 2946. in Camper, N. D. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Franz, J. E., Mao, M. K., and Sikorski, J. A. 1997. Glyphosate: A Unique Global Herbicide. Washington, DC American Chemical Society. 114.Google Scholar
Glass, R. L. 1984. Metal complex formation by glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem. 32:12491253.Google Scholar
Hall, G. J., Hart, C. A., and Jones, C. A. 2000. Plants as sources of cations antagonistic to glyphosate activity. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:351358.Google Scholar
Hetherington, P. R., Marshall, G., Kirkwood, R. C., and Warner, J. M. 1988. Absorption and efflux of glyphosate by cell suspensions. J. Exp. Bot. 49:527533.Google Scholar
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1991. The World's Worst Weeds— Distribution and Biology. Malabar, FL Krieger.Google Scholar
Lee, T. T. 1984. Release of lateral buds from apical dominance by glyphosate in soybean and pea seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 3:227235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. C. and Hawthorne, W. A. 1996. Critical plant and seed concentrations of phosphorus and zinc for predicting response of faba beans (Vicia faba). Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 36:479484.Google Scholar
Marschner, H. 1986. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 2nd ed. London Academic.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D. and Matysiak, R. 1991. Salt antagonism of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 39:622628.Google Scholar
Nalewaja, J. D., Matysiak, R., and Freeman, T. P. 1992. Spray droplet residual of glyphosate in various carriers. Weed Sci. 40:576589.Google Scholar
Nilsson, G. 1980. Influence of some metals on the phytotoxic effect of glyphosate. in Weeds and Weed Control: Proceedings of the 21st Swedish Weed conference, Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Science. 147.Google Scholar
Nilsson, G. 1985. Interactions between glyphosate and metals essential for plant growth. Pages 3547. in Grossbard, E. and Atkinson, D. The Herbicide Glyphosate. London Butterworths.Google Scholar
Oosterhuis, D., Hake, K., and Burmester, C. 1991. Foliar feeding cotton. Cotton Physiol. Today. 2:17.Google Scholar
Rout, G. R. and Das, P. 2003. Effect of metal toxicity on plant growth and metabolism, I: zinc. Agronomie. 23:311.Google Scholar
Teixeira, I. R., Borém, A., de Andrade Araújo, G. A., and Fontes, R. L. F. 2004. Manganese and zinc leaf application on common bean grown on a “cerrado” soil. Sci. Agric. 61:7781.Google Scholar
Thalooth, A. T., Tawfik, M. M., and Mohamed, M. H. 2006. A comparative study on the effect of foliar application of zinc, potassium and magnesium on growth, yield and some chemical constituents of mungbean plants grown under water stress conditions. World J. Agric. Sci. 2:3746.Google Scholar
Thelen, K. D., Jackson, E. P., and Penner, D. 1995. The basis for the hard water antagonism of glyphosate activity. Weed Sci. 43:541548.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. M., Main, C. L., Angela, T. M., and Steckel, L. E. 2007. Comparison of glyphosate salts (isopropylamine, diammonium, and potassium) and calcium and magnesium concentrations on the control of various weeds. Weed Technol. 20:164171.Google Scholar
Wills, G. D. and McWhorter, C. G. 1985. Effect of inorganic salts on the toxicity and translocation of glyphosate and MSMA in purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus). Weed Sci. 33:755761.Google Scholar
Woodburn, A. T. 2000. Glyphosate: production, pricing, and use worldwide. Pest Manag. Sci. 56:309312.Google Scholar
Zandstra, B. H., Teo, C. K., and Nishimoto, R. K. 1974. Response of purple nutsedge to repeated applications of glyphosate. Weed Sci. 22:230232.Google Scholar