Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T08:56:00.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Woollyleaf Bursage Response to Selected Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. T. Smith ,
A. F. Wiese  and
A. W. Cooley
D. T. Smith
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ. Agr. Res. and Ext. Center at Lubbock
A. F. Wiese
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ., Southwest. Great Plains Res. Center, Bushland, Texas 79012
A. W. Cooley
Affiliation:
Texas A&M Univ. Agr. Res. and Ext. Center at Lubbock, Lubbock, Texas 79401
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fenac [(2,3,6-trichlorophenyl)acetic acid] and 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid (picloram) at 28 and 2.2 kg/ha, respectively, controlled woollyleaf bursage (Franseria tomentosa Gray) for 3 years in noncropped areas. Effective control of woollyleaf bursage was obtained when treated at the bud stage or earlier with an ester formulation of (2,4-di= chlorophenoxy)acetic acid (2,4-D) at 2.2 kg/ha or 3-amino-s-triazole (amitrole) at 4.5 kg/ha in an oil-water emulsion carrier or 3,6-dichloro-o-anisic acid (dicamba) at 2.2 kg/ha in a water carrier with 0.5% surfactant. Picloram, at 0.44 kg/ha or more, controlled woollyleaf bursage at any time of application.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 6 , November 1972 , pp. 554 - 556
Copyright
Copyright © 1972 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Lavake, D. E., Wiese, A. F., and Chenault, E. W. 1970. Granular vs. liquid formulations of picloram, HRS-587, fenac and 2,3,6-TBA for control of field bindweed. Weed Sci. 18: 341–344.Google Scholar
2. Phillips, W. M. 1953. The use of soil sterilizing chemicals for the control of bur ragweed (Franseria tomentosa) . Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:32.Google Scholar
3. Phillips, W. M. 1953. The effect of 2,4-D and 2,4,5-T on bur ragweed (Franseria tomentosa) . Res. Rep. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:32.Google Scholar
4. Sand, P. F. and McCarty, M. K. 1963. Control of woollyleaf franseria with 2,4-D. Weeds 11:25–27.Google Scholar
5. Sand, P. F. and McCarty, M. K. 1964. Woollyleaf franseria. Nebr. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 482: 16 p.Google Scholar
6. Wiese, A. F. and Rea, H. E. 1961. Control of field bindweed and other perennial weeds with benzoic and phenyl = acetic acids. Weeds 9:423–428.Google Scholar
7. Zahnley, J. W., Anderson, L. E., and Russ, O. G. 1957. Controlling weeds in Kansas. Kansas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 390: 36 p.Google Scholar