Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T18:06:35.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wild Oat (Avena fatua) and Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Interference in a Greenhouse Experiment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Don W. Morishita ,
Donald C. Thill  and
John E. Hammel
Don W. Morishita
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
John E. Hammel
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intraspecific and interspecific interference effects on growth, gas exchange, and water potential of wild oat and spring barley were measured under greenhouse conditions using a 1:1.06 barley to wild oat replacement series. Intraspecific barley interference affected barley growth more than interspecific wild oat interference. Interspecific wild oat interference with barley reduced wild oat growth more than intraspecific interference. Wild oat plant height surpassed barley plant height near barley anthesis. Growth and gas exchange of barley and wild oat responded the same to short-term water stress.

Keywords

Wild oat, Avena fatua L. # AVEFAspring barley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Advance’Replacement seriesinterferenceapparent photosynthesisstomatal diffusive resistancetranspirationgrowth analysisleaf water potentialwater stressAVEFA
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 149 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competitive effects of wild oat in flax. Weed Sci. 16:501–504.Google Scholar
2. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.Google Scholar
3. Bowden, B. A. and Friesen, G. 1967. Competition of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in wheat and flax. Weed Res. 7:349–359.Google Scholar
4. Carlson, H. L. and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: Plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33:176–181.Google Scholar
5. Chancellor, R. J. 1969. Competition between wild oats and cereals. 3rd Colloq. Biol. mauv Herbes. Grignon. 10.Google Scholar
6. Chancellor, R. J. 1976. Seed behaviour. Pages 65—87 in Jones, D. P., ed. Wild Oats in World Agriculture. Agric. Res. Counc., London.Google Scholar
7. Chancellor, R. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1974. The time of onset of competition between wild oats (Avena fatua L.) and spring cereals. Weed Res. 14:197–202.Google Scholar
8. Cooperative Extension Service. 1977. Idaho Fertilizer Guide: Malting barley. Univ. Idaho Coll. Agric. Google Scholar
9. Cussans, G. W. and Wilson, B. J. 1975. Some effects of crop row width and seed rate on competition between spring barley and wild oat (Avena fatua L.) or common couch [Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv.]. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp. Status and Control of Grassweeds in Europe. Pages 77—86.Google Scholar
10. Day, W., Legg, B. J., French, B. K., Johnston, A. E., Lawler, D. W., and Jeffers, W. de C. 1978. A drought experiment using mobile shelters: The effect of drought on barley yield, water use and nutrient uptake. J. Agric. Sci. 91:599–623.Google Scholar
11. Harper, J. L. 1977. The population biology of plants. Academic Press, London. 892.Google Scholar
12. Hillel, D. 1982. Introduction to soil physics. Academic Press, New York. 364.Google Scholar
13. McNamara, D. W. 1976. Wild oat density and the duration of wild oat competition as it influences wheat growth and yield. Aust. J. Agric. Anim. Husb. 16:402–406.Google Scholar
14. Morishita, D. W. and Thill, D. C. 1988. Factors of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference on spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 36:37–42.Google Scholar
15. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1935. Root development of weeds and crop in competition under dry farming. Sci. Agric. 16:151–160.Google Scholar
16. Peters, N.C.B. 1984. Time of onset of competition and effects of various fractions of an Avena fatua L. population on spring barley. Weed Res. 24:305–315.Google Scholar
17. Peters, N.C.B. and Wilson, B. J. 1983. Some studies on the competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. II. Variation of A. fatua emergence and development and its influence on crop yield. Weed Res. 23:305–311.Google Scholar
18. Radosevich, S. A. 1987. Methods to study interactions among crops and weeds. Weed Technol. 1:190–198.Google Scholar
19. Radosevich, S. R. and Holt, J. S. 1984. Weed Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 265.Google Scholar
20. Saghir, A. R., Kahn, A. R., and Worzella, W. W. 1968. Effects of plant parts on the grain yield, kernel weight, and plant height of wheat and barley. Agron. J. 60:95–97.Google Scholar
21. Scholander, P. F., Hammel, H. T., Bradstreet, E. D., and Hemmingsen, E. A. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Sci. 148:339–346.Google Scholar
22. Thurston, J. M. 1959. A comparative study of the growth of wild oats (Avena fatua L. and A. ludoviciana Dur.) and of cultivated cereals with varied nitrogen supply. Ann. Appl. Biol. 47:716–739.Google Scholar
23. Thurston, J. M. 1962. The effect of competition from cereal crops on the germination and growth of Avena fatua L. in a naturally infested field. Weed Res. 2:192–207.Google Scholar
24. Wiebe, H. H., Campbell, G. S., Gardner, W. H., Rowlins, S. L., Cary, J. W., and Brown, R. W. 1971. Measurement of plant and soil water status. Utah Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 484.Google Scholar
25. Williams, B. A., Gurner, P. J., and Austin, R. B. 1982. A new infrared gas analyzer and portable photosynthesis meter. Photosynth. Res. 3:141–151.Google Scholar
26. Wilson, B. J. and Peters, N.C.B. 1982. Some studies of competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. I. The influence of A. fatua on yield of barley. Weed Res. 22:143–148.Google Scholar
27. Wit, C. T. de and van den Bergh, J. P. 1965. Competition among herbage plants. Neth. J. Agric. Sci. 13:212–221.Google Scholar