Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Weed Management Practice Selection Among Midwest U.S. Organic Growers

  • James J. DeDecker (a1), John B. Masiunas (a2), Adam S. Davis (a1) and Courtney G. Flint (a3)

Abstract

Organic agricultural systems increase the complexity of weed management, leading organic farmers to cite weeds as one of the greatest barriers to organic production. Integrated Weed Management (IWM) systems have been developed to address the ecological implications of weeds and weed management in cropping systems, but adoption is minimal. Organic agriculture offers a favorable context for application of IWM, as both approaches are motivated by concern for environmental quality and agricultural sustainability. However, adoption of IWM on organic farms is poorly understood due to limited data on weed management practices used, absence of an IWM adoption metric, and insufficient consideration given to the unique farming contexts within which weed management decisions are made. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) characterize organic weed management systems; (2) identify motivations for, and barriers to, selection of weed management practices; and (3) generate guiding principles for effective targeting of weed management outreach. We surveyed Midwestern organic growers to determine how specified psychosocial, demographic, and farm structure factors influence selection of weed management practices. Cluster analysis of the data detected three disparate, yet scaled, approaches to organic weed management. Clusters were distinguished by perspective regarding weeds and the number of weed management practices used. Categorization of individual farms within the identified approaches was influenced by primary farm products as well as farmer education, years farming, and information-seeking behavior. The proposed conceptual model allows weed management educators to target outreach for enhanced compatibility of farming contexts and weed management technologies.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: dedecke5@msu.edu

References

Hide All
Bastiaans, L, Paolini, R, Baumann, D (2008) Focus on ecological weed management: What is hindering adoption? Weed Res 48:481491
Buhler, D, Liebman, M, Obrycki, J (2000) Theoretical and practical challenges to an IPM approach to weed management. Weed Sci 48:274280
Bürger, J, de Mol, F, Gerowitt, B (2012) Influence of cropping system factors on pesticide use intensity – a multivariate analysis of on-farm data in north East Germany. Eur J Agron 40:5463
Burton, RJF, Wilson, G (2006) Injecting social psychology theory into conceptualisations of agricultural agency: towards a post-productivist farmer self-identity? J Rural Stud 22:95115
Cardina, J, Webster, T, Herms, C, Regnier, E (1999) Development of weed IPM: levels of integration for weed management. J Crop Prod 2:239267
Ceylan, IC, Koksal, O, Kutlar, I (2010) Determination of effective factors on adoption of integrated pest management practices. J Environ Prot Ecol 11:709717
Czapar, G, Curry, M, Gray, M (1995) Survey of integrated pest management practices in central Illinois. J Prod Agr 8:3446
Davis, A, Renner, K, Gross, K (2005) Weed seedbank and community shifts in a long-term cropping systems experiment. Weed Sci 53:296306
Deytieux, VT, Nemecek, R, Knuchel, F, Gaillard, G, Munier-Jolain, N (2012) Is integrated weed management efficient for reducing environmental impacts of cropping systems? A case study based on life cycle assessment. Eur J Agron 36:5565
Dice, LR (1945) Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26:297302
Dillman, DA, Smyth, JD, Christian, L (2008) Internet, Mail and Mixed-Mode Surveys. 3rd edn. New York Wiley & Sons. 500 p
Doohan, D, Wilson, R, Canales, E, Parker, J (2010) Investigating the human dimension of weed management: new tools of the trade. Weed Sci 58:510
Edwards-Jones, G (2006) Modelling farmer decision-making: concepts, progress and challenges. Animal Sci 82:783790
Electronic Code of Federal Regulations. 2012. Section 7.B.1.M.205. National organic progrAm. http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&sid=3f34f4c22f9aa8e6d9864cc2683cea02&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title07/7cfr205_main_02.tpl. Accessed September 23, 2012.
Fairweather, JR, Campbell, H (1996) The Decision Making of Organic and Conventional Agricultural Producers (No. 233). Canterbury, New Zealand Agribusiness and Economics Research Unit. 30 p
Feder, G, Umali, D (1993) The adoption of agricultural innovations: a review. Technol Forecast Soc Change 43:215239
Finch, H (2005) Comparison of distance measures in cluster analysis with dichotomous data. J Data Sci 3:85100
Gintis, H (2009) Decision theory and human behavior. Pages 129 in The Bounds of Reason: Game Theory and the Unification of the Behavioral Sciences. Princeton, NJ Princeton University Press
Hair, J, Anderson, R, Tatham, R, Black, W (1992) Multivariate Data Analysis. 2nd edn. New York Macmillan Publishing Company. 816 p
Haydu, J (2011) Cultural modeling in two eras of US food protest: Grahamites (1830s) and organic advocates (1960s–70s). Soc Probl 58:461487
IBM Corp. (2011) IBM statistics for Windows. Version 20.0. Armonk, NY
Jabbour, R, Zwickle, S, Gallandt, ER, McPhee, KE, Wilson, RS (2013) Mental models of organic weed management: comparison of New England US farmer and expert models. Renew Agr Food Syst FirstView Article 115
Jasinski, J, Eisley, B, Gastier, T, Kovach, J (2001) Scoring IPM adoption in Ohio: It really adds up. http://www.joe.org/joe/2001october/iw1.php. Accessed September 23, 2012.
Kelling, KA, Schulte, E, Peters, J (1996) One hundred years of Ca:Mg ratio research. New Horiz in Soil, No. 8. Madison, WI University of Wisconsin. 6 p
Kopittke, PM, Menzies, N (2007) A review of the use of the basic cation saturation ratio and the “ideal” soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71:259265
Lamine, C (2011) Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign: cases from organic farming and IPM. J Rural Stud 27:209219
Liebman, M, Mohler, C, Staver, C (2001) Ecological management of agricultural weeds. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 532 p
McCann, E, Sullivan, S, Erickson, D, DeYoung, R (1997) Environmental awareness, economic orientation, and farming practices: a comparison of organic and conventional farmers. Environ Manage 21:747758
Padgham, J (2011) Book review: weeds and why they grow by Jay McCaman. Organic Broadcaster. September–October 2011.
Park, TA, Lohr, L (2005) Organic pest management decisions: a systems approach to technology adoption. Agric Econ 33:467478
Pennings, JME, Irwin, S, Good, D (2002) Surveying farmers: a case study. Rev Agr Econ 24:266277
Riemens, MM, Groeneveld, R, Kropff, M, Lotz, L, Renes, R, Sukkel, W, van der Weide, R (2010) Linking farmer weed management behavior with weed pressure: more than just technology. Weed Sci 58:496
Rydberg, N, Milberg, P (2000) A survey of weeds in organic farming in Sweden. Biol Agric Hortic 18:175185
Samiee, A, Rezvanfar, A, Faham, E (2009) Factors influencing the adoption of integrated pest management (IPM) by wheat growers in Varamin county, Iran. Afr J Agr Res 4:491497
Sattler, C, Nagel, U (2010) Factors affecting farmers' acceptance of conservation measures: a case study from north-eastern Germany. Land Use Pol 27:7077
Schonbeck, M (2000) Balancing soil nutrients in organic vegetable production systems: testing Albrecht's base saturation theory in southeastern soils. Inf Bull 10:17
Simon, H (1990) Bounded rationality. Pages 1518 in Eatwell, J, Milgate, M, Newman, P, eds. Utility and Probability. New York W. W. Norton
Smith, DH, Collins, M (2003) Forbs. Pages 215236 in Barnes, RF, Nelson, CJ, Collins, M, Moore, KJ, eds. Forages: An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture. Ames, IA Iowa State Press
Spall, J (2005) Monte Carlo computation of the Fisher information matrix in nonstandard settings. J Comput Graph Stat 14:889909
Straub, ET (2009) Understanding technology adoption: theory and future directions for informal learning. Rev Educ Res 79:625649
[USDA] U.S. Department of Agriculture. (2009) 2007 Census of agriculture. Washington DC National Agricultural Statistics Service. 739 p
USDA. (2010) List of certified operations. http://apps.ams.usda.gov/nop/. Accessed September 23, 2012.
Villamil, MB, Alexander, MM, Silvis, A, Gray, M (2012) Producer perceptions and information needs regarding their adoption of bioenergy crops. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 16:36043612
Walz, E (1999) Third Biennial National Organic Farmer's Survey. Santa Cruz, CA Organic Farming Research Foundation. 126 p
Walz, E (2004) Fourth National Organic Farmer's Survey. Santa Cruz, CA Organic Farming Research Foundation. 106 p
Ward, J (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58:236
Wilson, RS, Hooker, N, Tucker, M, LeJeune, J, Doohan, D (2009) Targeting the farmer decision making process: a pathway to increased adoption of integrated weed management. Crop Prot 28:756764

Keywords

Weed Management Practice Selection Among Midwest U.S. Organic Growers

  • James J. DeDecker (a1), John B. Masiunas (a2), Adam S. Davis (a1) and Courtney G. Flint (a3)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed