Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T06:41:57.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Weed Competition in Cotton. I. Sicklepod and Tall Morningglory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gale A. Buchanan  and
Earl R. Burns
Gale A. Buchanan
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Auburn, Alabama 36830
Earl R. Burns
Affiliation:
Dep. of Agron. and Soils, Auburn Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta. Auburn Univ. Coop. Ext. Serv., Auburn, Alabama 36830
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was grown at two locations in Alabama during 1966 to 1969 with specific densities of sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L.) and tall morningglory (Ipomoea purpurea L. Roth). Competition from sicklepod and tall morningglory caused cotton yield reductions at densities as low as eight weeds per 7.31 m of row. Tall morningglory was usually more competitive than sicklepod in cotton. Both species were more competitive on Lucedale sandy clay loam than on Norfolk sandy loam. Sicklepod at eight weeds per 7.31 m of row reduced yields from 10 to 23% on the Norfolk soil and approximately 40% on the Lucedale soil. At the highest density, 48 sicklepod plants per 7.31 m of row, yields were reduced 45 to 65% on the Norfolk soil and approximately 80% on the Lucedale soil. Tall morningglory at a density of eight weeds per 7.31 m of row reduced cotton yields 10 to 40% on the Norfolk soil and 50 to 75% on the Lucedale soil. Vegetative growth, boll, and seed size were not affected as much as cotton yields by competition. Percentage lint and lint fiber properties were unaffected by competition.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , September 1971 , pp. 576 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competitive effects of wild oat in flax. Weed Sci. 16:501–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bell, A. R. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Effect of duration of wild oat competition in flax. Weed Sci. 16:509–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Blackman, G. E. and Templeman, W. G. 1938. The nature of competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. J. of Agr. Sci. 28:247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Brimhall, P. B., Chamberlain, E. W., and Alley, H. P. 1965. Competition of annual weeds and sugar beets. Weeds 13:33–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1970. Influence of weed competition on cotton. Weed Sci. 18:149–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Burnside, O. C. and Wicks, G. A. 1967. The effect of weed removal treatments on sorghum growth. Weed Sci. 15:204–207.Google Scholar
8. Clements, F. E., Weaver, J. E., and Hanson, H. C. 1929. Plant competition–Analysis of community function. Carnegie Institute, Washington, D. C. 340 p.Google Scholar
9. Dawson, J. H. 1964. Competition between irrigated field beans and annual weeds. Weeds 12:206–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Dawson, J. H. 1965. Competition between irrigated sugar beets and annual weeds. Weeds 13:245–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Fabricius, L. J. and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition between wheat and wild buckwheat. Weed Sci. 16:204–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Knake, E. L. and Slife, F. W. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Nieto, J. H., Brondo, M. A., and Gonzalez, J. T. 1968. Critical periods of the crop growth cycle for competition from weeds. Pest Articles and News Summaries. Section C. Weed Control. Great Britain Tropical Products Institute, London 14:159–166.Google Scholar
14. Pavlychenko, T. K. and Harrington, J. B. 1934. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can. J. Res. 10:77–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Peters, E. J., Gebhardt, M. R., and Stritzke, J. F. 1965. Interrelations of row spacings, cultivations and herbicides for weed control in soybeans. Weeds 13:285–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Robinson, H. G. 1949. Annual weeds, their viable seed population in soil and their effects on yield of oats, wheat, and flax. Agron. J. 41:513–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Smith, R. J. Jr. 1968. Weed competition in rice. Weed Sci. 16:252–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Staniforth, D. W. 1965. Competitive effects of three foxtail species of soybeans. Weeds 13:191–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Wax, L. M. and Pendleton, J. W. 1968. Effect of row spacing on weed control in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:462–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Wiese, A. F., Collier, J. W., Clark, L. E., and Havelka, U. D. 1964. Effect of weeds and cultural practices on sorghum yields. Weeds 12:209–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Wilson, H. P. and Cole, R. H. 1966. Morningglory competition in soybeans. Weeds 14:49–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Zimdahl, R. L. and Fertig, S. N. 1967. Influence of weed competition on sugar beets. Weed Sci. 15:336–339.Google Scholar