Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:39:58.980Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Volatile Monoterpenes as Potential Parent Structures for New Herbicides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Steven F. Vaughn  and
Gayland F. Spencer
Steven F. Vaughn
Affiliation:
Bioactive Constituents Res., Nat. Ctr. for Agric. Utilization Res., 1815 N. University St., Peoria, IL 61604
Gayland F. Spencer
Affiliation:
Bioactive Constituents Res., Nat. Ctr. for Agric. Utilization Res., 1815 N. University St., Peoria, IL 61604
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Eighteen volatile monoterpenes, which are among the major constituents of essential oils from plants, were screened for phytotoxicity to several crop and weed species. Several monoterpenes containing an oxygen function severely inhibited germination of four different annual weeds while concurrently displaying little effect on soybean germination. Soybeans varied in their sensitivity to various monoterpenes (measured by seedling growth), with α-terpineol and geraniol selectivity inhibiting weed seed germination while having little or no effect on soybeans. All of the monoterpenes tested exhibited relatively high germination and growth inhibition to corn and wheat.

Keywords

Cinmethylin, exo-1-methyl-4-(1-methylethyl)-2-[(2-methylphenyl)methoxy]-7-oxabicyclo [2.2.1] heptaneItalian ryegrass, Lolium multiflorum Lam. #3 LOLMUlarge crabgrass, Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop. #DIGSAredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retroflexus L. #AMAREvelvetleaf, Abutilon theophrasti Medik. #ABUTHalfalfa, Medicago sativa (L.) ‘Vernal’corn, Zea mays (L.) ‘Pioneer 3377’cucumber, Cucumis sativus (L.) ‘Edmonson’soybeans, Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Williams 82’wheat, Triticum aestivum (L.) ‘Coker 68–19’Allelochemicalsgerminationgrowth inhibition
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 41 , Issue 1 , March 1993 , pp. 114 - 119
Copyright
Copyright © 1993 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Alsaadawi, I. S., Arif, M. B., and Alrubeaa, A. J. 1985. Allelopathic effects of Citrus aurantium L. II. Isolation, characterization, and biological activities of phytotoxins. J. Chem. Ecol. 11:1527–1534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Anonymous. 1975. Page 2351 in CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. CRC Press, Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1983. Page 2179 in The Merck Index. Vol. 10. Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ.Google Scholar
4. Asplund, R. O. 1968. Monoterpenes: relationship between structure and inhibition of germination. Phytochemistry 7:1995–1997.Google Scholar
5. Del Moral, R. and Muller, C. H. 1970. The allelopathic effects of Eucalyptus camaldulensis. Am. Midl. Nat. 83:254–282.Google Scholar
6. Duke, S. O. 1991. Plant terpenoids as pesticides. Pages 269–296 in Keeler, R. F. and Tu, A. T., eds. Vol. 6. Toxicology of Plant and Fungal Compounds. Marcel-Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
7. Duke, S. O., Vaughn, K. C., Croom, E. M. Jr., and Elsohly, H. N. Artemisinin, a constituent of annual wormwood (Artemisia annua), is a selective phytotoxin. Weed Sci. 35:499–505.Google Scholar
8. Elakovich, S. D. 1988. Terpenoids as models for new agrochemicals. Pages 250–261 in Cutler, H. G., Ed. Biologically Active Natural Products: Potential Use in Agriculture. Am. Chem. Soc., Washington, DC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. El-Deek, M. H. and Hess, F. D. 1986. Inhibited mitotic entry is the cause of growth inhibition by cinmethylin. Weed Sci. 34:684–688.Google Scholar
10. Fischer, N. H. 1986. The function of mono and sesquiterpenes as 14 plant germination and growth regulators. Pages 203–218 in The Science of Allelopathy. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
11. Jordan, T. E. 1954. Page 266 in Vapor Pressure of Organic Compounds. Interscience Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
12. Lorber, P. and Muller, W. H. 1976. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by Salvia leucophylla: effects on seedling root tip ultrastructure. Am. J. Bot. 63:196–200.Google Scholar
13. Lorber, P. and Muller, W. H. 1980. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by Salvia leucophylla: effects on cytological activity in Allium cepa. Comp. Physiol. Ecol. 5:60–67.Google Scholar
14. May, J. W., Goss, J. R., Moncorge, J. M., and Murphy, M. W. 1985. SD 95481 a versatile new herbicide with wide spectrum crop use. Proc. Br. Crop Prot. Conf. 12:265–270.Google Scholar
15. Muller, C. H. 1966. The role of chemical inhibition (allelopathy) in vegetational composition. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 93:332–351.Google Scholar
16. Muller, C. H., Muller, W. H., and Haines, B. L. 1964. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by aromatic shrubs. Science 143:471–473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17. Muller, W. H. and Muller, C. H. 1964. Volatile growth inhibitors produced by Salvia species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 91:327–330.Google Scholar
18. Putnam, A. R. 1983. Allelopathic chemicals. Chem. Eng. News 6:34–45.Google Scholar
19. Reynolds, T. 1987. Comparative effects of alicyclic compounds and quinones on inhibition of lettuce fruit germination. Ann. Bot. 60:215–223.Google Scholar
20. Sherman, M. E., Thompson, L. Jr., and Wilkinson, R. E. 1983. Sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) management in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 31:622–627.Google Scholar
21. Sorensen, A. A. 1990. Farmer concerns: Food safety, biotechnology, and the consumer. Pages 103–117 in MacDonald, J. F., ed. NABC Report 2, Agricultural Biotechnology, Food Safety and Nutritional Quality for the Consumer. Nat. Agric. Biotechnol. Counc., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
22. Weaver, T. and Kish, L. 1982. Allelopathic potential of terpene secreting (aromatic) plants. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci. 41:51–56.Google Scholar
23. Williamson, G. B., Fischer, N. H., Richardson, D. R., and de la Peña, A. Chemical inhibition of fire-prone grasses by fire-sensitive shrub, Conradina canescens. J. Chem. Ecol. 15:1567–1577.Google Scholar