Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-29T14:41:43.570Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sugarcane (Saccharum) Production by Minimum Cultivation, Fenac, and Terbacil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R.W. Millhollon
R.W. Millhollon*
Affiliation:
Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., U.S. Sugarcane Field Lab., Houma, LA 70361
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Sugarcane (Saccharum interspecific hybrids) grown without cultivation but maintained relatively weed-free with herbicides and hand hoeing, produced yields of sugarcane/ha and sugar/ha in the plant, first-ratoon, and second-ratoon crops that were 100%, 95%, and 88%, respectively, of the yield of sugarcane cultivated two to four times annually. Standard cultural practice involves at least two cultivations, namely, the off-barring and the fertilizational cultivations. Additional cultivations did not substantially increase yield. When sugarcane yield was affected either by cultivation or herbicide treatment, stalk population rather than stalk weight was affected the most. Johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.] and annual weeds were controlled effectively in both cultivated and non-cultivated sugarcane with broadcast, preemergence application of fenac [(2,3,6-trichlorophenyl)acetic acid] at 5 kg/ha or terbacil (3-tert-butyl-5-chloro-6-methyluracil) at 1.8 kg/ha. Purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus L.), however, was controlled only with a combination of fenac or terbacil and periodic cultivation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 25 , Issue 5 , September 1977 , pp. 431 - 436
Copyright
Copyright © 1977 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Matherne, R.J. 1974. The effect of number of cultivations on sugarcane production in Louisiana. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 4(NS): 109–112.Google Scholar
2. Matherne, R.J. and Millhollon, R.W. 1973. Tolerance of two sugarcane cultivars to terbacil, fenac, and dalapon. Weed Sci. 21:139–141.Google Scholar
3. Millhollon, R.W. 1976. Influence of fenac and terbacil on growth and yield of sugarcane. Proc. Am. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 5(NS):104–108.Google Scholar
4. Millhollon, R.W. 1964. Evaluation of fenac for control of johnsongrass seedlings and other weeds in sugarcane. Sugar J. 26:22–26.Google Scholar
5. Ricaud, R. 1972. Effects of varying numbers of cultivation on sugarcane produciton in Louisiana. Proc. Int. Soc. Sugar Cane Technol. 14:634–639.Google Scholar
6. Sanford, J.O., Myhre, D.L., and Merwine, N.C. 1973. Double crop-ping systems involving no-tillage and conventional tillage. Agron. J. 65:978–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar