Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T08:02:46.877Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sorption and Degradation of Thiobencarb in Three Florida Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Michael P. Braverman
Affiliation:
Vegetable Crops Dep., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Joan A. Dusky
Affiliation:
Vegetable Crops Dep., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Salvadore J. Locascio
Affiliation:
Vegetable Crops Dep., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611
Arthur G. Hornsby
Affiliation:
Soils Dep., Univ. Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611

Abstract

Laboratory studies were conducted to characterize the adsorption-desorption and degradation of thiobencarb in soil. Thiobencarb adsorption on soil was correlated with soil organic carbon (r = 0.97) and values (ml g−1) for the following soils were: Pahokee muck 339, Everglades muck 169, and Immokalee sand 14. The adsorption values (ml g−1) per unit of organic carbon were Immokalee sand 1195, Pahokee muck 765, and Everglades muck 539. In desorption studies, thiobencarb Kf values increased 80 ml g−1 from the first to the third desorption step in the muck soils, but were similar in three desorptions from the sand. The half-lives of thiobencarb averaged 16, 18, and 24 days on surface samples of Pahokee muck, Everglades muck, and Immokalee sand, respectively, across the range of 25 to 35 C and 10 to 100 kPa soil water tension. Half-lives were generally longer with water contents equivalent to 100 kPa than 10 kPa soil water tension and incubated at 25 than 35 C. The relative percentages of extractable 14C, bound 14C, and 14CO2 from 14C-thiobencarb-treated soil were dependent on soil type, soil water content, incubation temperature, and time.

Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, R. S. Jr. 1973. Factors influencing soil adsorption and bioactivity of pesticides. Residue Rev. 47:154.Google Scholar
2. Ambrosi, D., Kearny, P. C., and Macchia, J. A. 1977. Persistence and metabolism of phosalone in soil. J. Agric. Food Chem. 25:342347.Google Scholar
3. Duah-Yentumi, S. and Kuwatsuka, S. 1980. Effect of organic matter and chemical fertilizers on the degradation of benthiocarb and MCPA herbicides in the soil. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 26:541549.Google Scholar
4. Duah-Yentumi, S. and Kuwatsuka, S. 1982. Microbial degradation of benthiocarb, MCPA and 2,4-D herbicides in perfused soils amended with organic matter and chemical fertilizers. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 28:1926.Google Scholar
5. Dusky, J. A. 1982. Herbicides for celery, lettuce and carrots in the Everglades agricultural area. Proc. Fla. State Hortic. Soc. 95:339342.Google Scholar
6. Hamaker, J. W., Goring, C.A.I., and Youngson, C. R. 1966. Sorption and leaching of 4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid in soils. Organic Pesticides in the Environment. Adv. Chem. 60:2337.Google Scholar
7. Ishikawa, K., Asano, Y., Nakamura, Y., and Akasaki, K. 1976. Behavior and disappearance of benthiocarb herbicide in water, soil and rice plants in paddy field treated with its granular formulations. Weed Res. Jpn. 21:1621.Google Scholar
8. Katan, J., Fuhreman, T. W., and Lichtenstein, E. P. 1976. Binding of 14C-parathion in soil: A reassessment of pesticide persistence. Science 193:891894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kumiai Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. 1977. Saturn (Benthiocarb). Tokyo, Jpn. 101 pp.Google Scholar
10. Lambert, S. M. 1968. Omega (Om) a useful index of soil sorption equilibria. J. Agric. Food Chem. 16:340343.Google Scholar
11. Nelson, D. W. and Sommers, L. E. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. Pages 539579 in Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2 – Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R., eds. Am. Soc. Agron., Soil Sci. Soc. Am., Madison, WI.Google Scholar
12. Rao, P.S.C. and Davidson, J. M. 1980. Estimation of pesticide retention and transformation parameters required in nonpoint source pollution models. Pages 2667 in Environmental Impact of Nonpoint Source Pollution. Overcash, M. R. and Davidson, J. M., eds. Ann Arbor Sci. Publ., Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
13. Reiners, S., Gorski, S. F., and DeSouza, J.J.V. 1988. Uptake, translocation and metabolism of thiobencarb in two lettuce cultivars. Weed Sci. 36:553557.Google Scholar
14. Skipper, H. D., Murdock, E. C., Gooden, D. T., Zublena, J. P., and Amakiri, M. A. 1986. Enhanced herbicide biodegradation in South Carolina soils previously treated with butylate. Weed Sci. 34:558563.Google Scholar
15. Sissons, C. H. 1976. Improved technique for accurate and convenient assay of biological reaction liberating 14CO2 . Anal. Biochem. 70:454462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Talbert, R. E. and Fletchall, O. H. 1965. The adsorption of some striazines in soils. Weeds 13:4652.Google Scholar
17. Tatsuyama, K., Yamamoto, H., and Egawa, H. 1981. Bioassay of dechlorination of benthiocarb (thiobencarb) herbicide in flooded soil using germinated grains of rice plants. J. Pestic. Sci. 6:193199.Google Scholar
18. Weed Science Society of America Herbicide Handbook Committee. 1983. Herbicide Handb. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. 5th ed. WSSA, Champaign, EL.Google Scholar
19. Zelazny, L. W. and Carlisle, W. H. 1974. Physical, chemical, elemental and oxygen-containing functional group analysis of selected Florida Histols. In Histosols, Chap. 6. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Spec. Publ. No. 6. Pages 6378.Google Scholar