Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:49:52.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Roller Applicator for Shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) Control in Row Crops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Gregory L. Schneider
Affiliation:
Soil Sci., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric.
Curt B. Koehler
Affiliation:
Soil Sci., Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric.
James S. Schepers
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
Orvin C. Burnside
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583

Abstract

Greenhouse and field experiments were conducted with a roller applicator at Lincoln, Nebraska, during 1979 and 1980. Glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] concentrations of 5, 10, and 20% and carpet saturations of 50 and 75% controlled shattercane [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] when applied to the top 30 cm of the plant in greenhouse research. In the field, glyphosate concentrations of 5 to 20% with a carpet saturation of 50% controlled shattercane acceptably in soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], but a concentration of 2.5% with 25% carpet saturation did not. Weed control was comparable whether speed of application was 3.2, 6.4, or 9.6 km/h. Shattercane control in grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench.] was excellent at glyphosate concentrations of 5, 10, and 20% and at carpet saturations of 50 and 75%, and sorghum injury was minimal at 25 and 50% carpet saturations. The roller applicator was compared to a ropewick applicator for shattercane control in sorghum. Excellent weed control (90% or greater) with minimal crop injury was obtained with the roller applicator at glyphosate concentrations of 10 and 20% at application speeds of 3.2 and 6.4 km/h and with the ropewick applicator with glyphosate concentrations of 35 and 50% applied at 3.2, 6.4, and 9.6 km/h.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barrentine, W. L. and McWhorter, C. G. 1966. New spray techniques for directed postemergence weed control in row crops. Abstr., Weed Sci. Soc. Am. p. 104.Google Scholar
2. Burnside, O. C. 1965. Seed and phenological studies with shattercane. Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 220. 37 pp.Google Scholar
3. Burnside, O. C. 1968. Control of wild cane in soybeans. Weed Sci. 16:1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Burnside, O. C. and Wilson, R. G. Jr. 1979. Weed escapes – your future problems. Nebraska Farm, Ranch and Home Quart. 24(3):78.Google Scholar
5. Dale, J. E. 1978. The rope wick applicator – a new method of applying round-up. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:332. (Abstr.) Google Scholar
6. Irons, S. W. and Burnside, O. C. 1978. Feasibility of the roller applicator for controlling weed escapes in soybeans. North Cent. Weed Control. Conf. Res. Rep. 35:132133.Google Scholar
7. Koehler, C. B., Cramer, G. L., Irons, S. W., Schepers, J. S., and Burnside, O. C. 1980. Close up: roller herbicide applicator. Nebraska Farm, Ranch and Home Quart. 27(1):1214.Google Scholar
8. Schepers, J. S. and Burnside, O. C. 1979. Electronic moisture sensor for maintaining herbicide solution on a roller applicator. Weed Sci. 27:559561.Google Scholar
9. Vesecky, J. F., Feltner, K. C., and Vanderlip, R. L. 1973. Wild cane and forage sorghum competition in grain sorghum. Weed Sci. 21:2832.Google Scholar
10. Wyse, D. L. and Habstritt, C. 1977. A roller herbicide applicator. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 32:144145.Google Scholar