Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Robust Methods for Measurement of Leaf-Cover Area and Biomass from Image Data

  • Ran Nisim Lati (a1), Sagi Filin (a1) and Hanan Eizenberg (a2)

Abstract

Leaf-cover area is a widely required plant development parameter for predictive models of weed growth and competition. Its assessment is performed either manually, which is labor intensive, or via visual inspection, which provides biased results. In contrast, digital image processing enables a high level of automation, thereby offering an attractive means for estimating vegetative leaf-cover area. Nonetheless, image-driven analysis is greatly affected by illumination conditions and camera position at the time of imaging and therefore may introduce bias into the analysis. Addressing both of these factors, this paper proposes an image-based model for leaf-cover area and biomass measurements. The proposed model transforms color images into an illumination-invariant representation, thus facilitating accurate leaf-cover detection under varying light conditions. To eliminate the need for fixed camera position, images are transformed into an object–space reference frame, enabling measurement in absolute metric units. Application of the proposed model shows stability in leaf-cover detection and measurement irrespective of camera position and external illumination conditions. When tested on purple nutsedge, one of the world's most troublesome weeds, a linear relation between measured leaf-cover area and plant biomass was obtained regardless of plant developmental stage. Data on the expansion of purple nutsedge leaf-cover area is essential for modeling its spatial growth. The proposed model offers the possibility of acquiring reliable and accurate biological data from digital images without extensive photogrammetric or image-processing expertise.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: ranlati@tx.technion.ac.il

References

Hide All
Alvarez, J. M., Lopez, A., and Baldrich, R. 2008. Illuminant-invariant model-based road segmentation. Pages 11751180 in Proceeding of IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Bosnic, A. C. and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 45:276282.
Burgos-Artizzua, X. P., Ribeiroa, A., Tellaecheb, A., Pajaresc, G., and Fernandez-Quintanillad, C. 2009. Improving weed pressure assessment using digital images from an experience-based reasoning approach. Comput. Electron. Agric. 65:176185.
Campbell, J. B., ed. 1996. Introduction to Remote Sensing. New York Guilford Press. 622 p.
Donald, W. W. 2006. Estimated corn yields using either weed cover or rated control after pre-emergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 54:373379.
Donald, W. W., Archer, D., Johnson, W. G., and Nelson, K. 2004a. Zone herbicide application controls annual weeds and reduces residual herbicide use in corn. Weed Sci. 52:821833.
Donald, W. W., Johnson, W. G., and Nelson, K. A. 2004b. In-row and between-row interference by corn (Zea mays) modifies annual weed control by preemergence residual herbicide. Weed Technol. 18:487504.
Finlayson, G. D., Drew, M. S., and Lu, C. 2005. Invariant image improvement by sRGB colour space sharpening, in International Colour Association Congress. Granada Spain.
Finlayson, G. D., Hordley, S. D., and Drew, M. S. 2002. Removing shadows from images. Pages 823836 in ECCV '02: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision-Part IV. London, UK Springer-Verlag.
Gee, C. H., Bossu, J., Jones, G., and Truchetet, F. 2008. Crop/weed discrimination in perspective agronomic images. Comput. Electron. Agric. 60:4959.
Gitelson, A. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Stark, R., and Rundquist, D. 2002. Novel algorithm for remote estimation of vegetation fraction. Remote Sens. Environ. 80:7687.
Goldshlager, N., Filin, S., and Abergel, S. 2009. A Linear Photogrammetric Method for Measuring Erosion in Agricultural Fields. Transactions of the American Society of Agriculture and Biological Engineering. 52:437445.
Hague, T., Tillet, N. D., and Wheeler, H. 2006. Automated crop and weed monitoring in widely spaced cereals. Precis. Agric. 7:2132.
Hernández-Andrés, J., Lee, R. L. Jr., and Romero, J. 1999. Calculating correlated color temperatures across the entire gamut of daylight and skylight chromaticities. Appl. Optics. 38:27.
Kasdorf, W. E., ed. 2003. The Columbia Guide to Digital Publishing Columbia University Press, NewYork: 750 p.
Knezevic, S. Z., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1995. Comparison of empirical models depicting density of Amaranthus retroflexus L. and relative leaf area as predictors of yield loss in maize (Zea mays L.). Weed Res. 35:207214.
Kraus, K., ed. 1993. Photogrammetry. 4th ed, Volume 1. Bonn, Germany Dümmler.
Kropff, M. J., Weaver, S. E., and Smits, M. A. 1992. Use of ecophysiological models for crop-weed interference: relations amongst weed density, relative time of weed emergence, relative leaf area, and yield loss. Weed Sci. 40:296301.
Laliberte, A. S., Rango, A., Herrick, J. E., Fredrickson, E. L., and Burkett, L. M. 2007. An object-based image analysis approach for determining fractional cover of senescent and green vegetation with digital plot photography. J. Arid Environ. 69:114.
Lemieux, C., Vallee, L., and Vanasse, A. 2003. Predicting yield loss in maize fields and developing decision support for post-emergence herbicide applications. Weed Res. 43:323332.
Lindquist, J. L. and Knezevic, S. Z. 2001. Quantifying crop yield response to weed populations: applications and limitations. Pages 205232 in Peterson, R. K. D., and Higley, L. G., eds. Biotic Stress. Boca Raton, FL CRC Press.
Lucchese, L. and Mitra, S., K. 2000. Filtering color images in the xyY color space, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP '00), vol. 3, Pp. 500503 Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Malacara, D., ed. 2002. Color Vision and Colorimetry, Theory and Applications. Bellingham WA SPIE Press. 164 p.
Mao, W., Wang, Y., and Wang, Y. 2003. Real-Time Detection of Between-Row Weeds Using Machine Vision. ASAE paper number 031004. St. Joseph, MI The Society for Agricultural, Food, and Biological Systems.
Marchant, J. A., Tillett, R. D., and Brivot, R. 1998. Real-time segmentation of plants and weeds. Real-Time Imaging. 4:243253.
Meyer, G. E. and Neto, J. C. 2008. Verification of color vegetation indices for automated crop imaging applications. Comput. Electron. Agric. 63:282293.
Murphy, C., Lemerle, D., Jones, R., and Harden, S. 2002. Use of density to predict crop yield loss between variable seasons. Weed Res. 42:377384.
Ngouajio, M., Lemieux, C., Fortier, J. J., Careau, D., and Leroux, G. D. 1998. Validation of an operator-assisted module to measure weed and crop leaf cover by digital image analysis. Weed Technol. 12:446453.
Ngouajio, M., Lemieux, C., and Leroux, G. D. 1999a. Prediction of corn (Zea mays) yield loss from early observations of the relative leaf area and the relative leaf cover of weeds. Weed Sci. 47:297304.
Ngouajio, M., Leroux, G. D., and Lemieux, C. 1999b. Influence of images recording height and crop growth stage on leaf cover estimates and their performance in yield prediction models. Crop Prot. 18:501508.
Otsu, N. 1979. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. IEEE Trans. Sys., Man. Cyber. 9:6266.
Perez, A. J., Lopez, F., Benlloch, J. V., and Christensen, S. 2000. Color and shape analysis techniques for weed detection in cereal fields. Comput. Electron. Agric. 25:197212.
Pratt, W. K., ed. 2007. Digital Image Processing. 4th ed. Los Altos, CA John Wiley & Sons. 782 p.
Rasmussen, J., Norremark, M., and Bibby, B. M. 2007. Assessment of leaf cover and crop soil cover in weed harrowing research using digital images. Weed Res. 47:299310.
Reid, J. and Searcy, S. 1987. Vision-based guidance of an agricultural tractor. IEEE Control Systems Magazine. 7:3943.
Ribeiro, A., Fernández-Quintanilla, C., Barroso, J., and García-Alegre, M. C. 2005. Development of an image analysis system for estimation of weed. Pages 169174 in Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Precision Agriculture (5ECPA).
Ruiz-Ruiz, G., Gómez-Gil, J., and Navas-Gracia, L. M. 2009. Testing different color spaces based on hue for the environmentally adaptive segmentation algorithm (EASA). Comput. Electron. Agric. 68(1):8896.
Shrestha, D. S., Steward, B. L., and Birrell, S. J. 2004. Video processing for early stage maize plant detection. Biosys. Eng. 89:119129.
Tellaeche, A., BurgosArtizzu, X. P., Pajares, G., Ribeiro, A., and César, F. Q. 2008. A new vision-based approach to differential spraying in precision agriculture. Precis. Agric. 60:144155.
Thorp, K. R. and Tian, L. F. 2004. A review on remote sensing of weeds in agriculture. Precis. Agric. 5:477508.
Tian, L. F. and Slaughter, D. C. 1998. Environmentally adaptive segmentation algorithm for outdoor image segmentation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 21(3):153168.
Wang, G., McGiffen, M. E. Jr., and Ogbuchiekwe, E. J. 2008. Crop rotation effects on Cyperus rotundus and C. esculentus population dynamics in southern California vegetable production. Weed Res. 48:420428.
Webster, T. M. 2005. Patch expansion of purple nutsedge (Cyperus rotundus) and yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) with and without polyethylene mulch. Weed Sci. 53:839845.
Woebbecke, D. M., Meyer, G. E., Von Bargen, K., and Mortensen, D. A. 1995. Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions. Transactions of the ASAE. 38(1):259269.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Robust Methods for Measurement of Leaf-Cover Area and Biomass from Image Data

  • Ran Nisim Lati (a1), Sagi Filin (a1) and Hanan Eizenberg (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.