Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-thh2z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-06T13:55:54.286Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Responses of Rice to Postemergence Treatments of Propanil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

R. J. Smith Jr.*
Affiliation:
Agr. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. of Agr., Stuttgart, AR 72160

Abstract

In a 3-year study propanil (3′,4′-dichloropropionanilide) at 6.7 or 9.0 kg/ha was applied postemergence as single or split applications to rice (Oryza sativa L. ‘Starbonnet’ and ‘Nova 66′) 15 to 75 days after crop emergence. The effect on crop injury, maturity, grain yield, and seed and milling quality was measured on rice grown in weed-free plots. Residues of DCA (3,4-dichloroaniline) in grain and straw from treated rice plants and of propanil and TCAB (3,3′,4,4′-tetrachloroazobenzene) in treated soil were determined. Propanil applied at all times and rates in 1968 and 1970 or applied at all rates at 15 to 55 days after crop emergence in 1969 did not reduce grain yields, but 6.7 kg/ha applied 65 and 75 days after crop emergence in 1969 injured rice plants vegetatively and reduced grain yields. Plant maturity, seed viability and milling quality of grain were not affected. Residues of DCA in grain and straw were highest from treatments applied 65 and 75 days after crop emergence; rice straw contained more DCA than did grain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1974 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bartha, R. 1971. Fate of herbicide-derived chloroanilines in soil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19:385387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Bartha, R. 1971. Altered propanil biodegradation in temporarily air-dried soil. J. Agr. Food Chem. 19:394395.Google Scholar
3. Bartha, R. and Praner, D. 1967. Pesticide transformation to anline and azo compounds in soil. Science 156:16171618.Google Scholar
4. Chisaka, H. and Kearney, P.C. 1970. Metabolism of propanil in soils. J. Agr. Food Chem. 18:854858.Google Scholar
5. Frear, D.S. and Still, G.G. 1968. The metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants. Partial purification and properties of an aryl acylamidase from rice. Phytochemistry 7:913920.Google Scholar
6. Hodgson, R.H. 1971. Influence of environment on metabolism of propanil in rice. Weed Sci. 19:501507.Google Scholar
7. Kearney, P.C., Smith, R.J. Jr., Plimmer, J.R., and Guardia, F.S. 1970. Propanil and TCAB residues in rice soils. Weed Sci. 18:464466.Google Scholar
8. Smith, R.J. Jr. 1970. Weed control methods, losses and costs due to weeds, and benefits of weed control in rice. Pages 2437 in Tech. Papers FAO Int. Conf. on Weed Control. Weed Sci. Soc. Amer., Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
9. Smith, R.J. Jr. and Shaw, W.C. 1966. Weeds and their control in rice production. U.S. Dep. Agr., Agr. Hand. 292. U.S. Gov. Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 64 pp.Google Scholar
10. Still, G.G. 1968. Metabolism of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants: the metabolic fate of the 3,4-dichloroaniline moiety. Science 159:992993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Still, G.G. 1968. Metabolic fate of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide in plants: the metabolism of the propionic acid moiety. Plant Physiol. 213:543546.Google Scholar
12. Still, G.G. 1969. 3,4,3′,4′-tetrachloroazobenzene: its translocation and metabolism in rice plants. Weed Res. 9:211217.Google Scholar
13. Still, G.G. and Mansager, E.R. 1969. The presence of 3,4-dichloroaniline in rice grain hydrolysates. Weed Res. 9:218223.Google Scholar
14. Yih, R.Y., McRae, H., and Wilson, H.F. 1968. Mechanism of selective action of 3′,4′-dichloropropionanilide. Plant Physiol. 43: 12911296.Google Scholar
15. Yih, R.Y., McRae, D.H., and Wilson, H.F. 1968. Metabolism of 3′,4′-dichloropropionanilide: 3,4-dichloroaniline – lignin complex in rice plants. Science 161:376377.Google Scholar