Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-vpsfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T18:59:43.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phytotoxicity of Triallate Vapors to Wild Oat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stephen D. Miller
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102
John D. Nalewaja
Affiliation:
Agron. Dep. North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102

Abstract

Wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seedlings were exposed to vapors arising from soil treated with triallate [S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate]. Vapor from the liquid triallate formulation inhibited seedling growth more than vapor from the granular formulation, and the degree of inhibition was least in Fargo clay, intermediate in Hecla sandy loam and greatest in washed sand. Growth inhibition from vapors of soil-applied liquid or granular triallate increased as soil moisture content and soil temperature increased. The site of effective vapor action on wild oat seedlings was below the soil surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1976 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bailey, G.W. and White, J.L. 1964. Soil pesticide relationships. Review of adsorption and desorption of organic pesticides by soil colloids, with implications concerning pesticide bioactivity. J. Agr. Food Chem. 12:324332.Google Scholar
2. Banting, J.D. 1967. Factors affecting the activity of diallate and triallate. Weed Res. 7:302315.Google Scholar
3. Dawson, J.H. 1963. Development of barnyardgrass seedlings and their response to EPTC. Weeds 11:6066.Google Scholar
4. Deming, J.M., Wilson, C.L., Hamm, P.C., and Damico, J.J. 1959. Introductory studies on an effective wild oat control chemical. Proc. N. Cent. Weed Contr. Conf. 16:4950.Google Scholar
5. Evans, D.M. 1970. The performance of triallate in granular form for control of Avena spp. and Alopecurus myosuroides . Proc. 10th Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 10:842848.Google Scholar
6. Gray, R.A. and Weirich, A.J. 1965. Factors affecting vapor losses of EPTC from soil. Weeds 13:141147.Google Scholar
7. Holyroyd, J. 1968. Triallate granules for the postemergence control of Avena fatua in winter and spring cereals. Proc. 9th Brit. Weed Contr. Conf. 9:6873.Google Scholar
8. Kahn, S.U. 1973. Interaction of S-2,3,3-trichloroallyl N,N-diisopropylthiocarbamate (Triallate) with montmorillonite. J. Environ. Qual. 2:415416.Google Scholar
9. Miller, S.D. and Nalewaja, J.D. 1975. Postemergence applications of triallate for wild oat control. Weed Sci. 23:137141.Google Scholar
10. Nalewaja, J.D. 1968. Uptake and translocation of diallate in wheat, barley, flax, and wild oat. Weed Sci. 16:309312.Google Scholar
11. Parker, C. 1963. Factors affecting the selectivity of 2,3-dichloroallyldiisopropylthiocarbamate. Weed Res. 3:259276.Google Scholar
12. Parochetti, J.V. and Warren, G.F. 1966. Vapor losses of IPC and CIPC. Weeds 14:281285.Google Scholar
13. Parochetti, J.V., Hein, E.R., and Colby, S.R. 1971. Volatility of dichlobenil. Weed Sci. 19:2831.Google Scholar
14. Parochetti, J.V. and Hein, E.R. 1973. Volatility and photodecomposition of trifluralin, benefin, and nitralin. Weed Sci. 21:469473.Google Scholar
15. Smith, A.E. 1970. Degradation, adsorption and volatility of diallate and triallate in prairie soils. Weed Res. 10:331339.Google Scholar
16. Swann, C.W. and Behrens, R. 1972. Phytotoxicity of trifluralin vapors from soil. Weed Sci. 20:143146.Google Scholar
17. Talbert, R.E., Smith, D.R., and Frans, R.E. 1971. Volatilization leaching and adsorption of prometryne in relation to selectivity in cotton. Weed Sci. 19:610.Google Scholar
18. Vernetti, J. and Freed, V.H. 1963. Soil behavior of four thiocarbamates. Res. Prog. Report West. Weed Contr. Conf. p. 89.Google Scholar