Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T07:28:17.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological variation among hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) populations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Corey V. Ransom
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
James J. Kells*
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824-1325
Loyd M. Wax
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS, Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
Michael S. Orfanedes
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
*
Corresponding author. kells@pilot.msu.edu

Abstract

Experiments were conducted to examine morphological variation among hemp dogbane populations. Rootstocks collected from 16 sites throughout Michigan and Illinois were used to establish nurseries in East Lansing, MI, and Champaign, IL. Growth, stem characteristics, and leaf characteristics were measured for each ecotype at both nurseries. Differences among ecotypes were observed for all measurements except emergence date and growing degree days to emergence. The number of shoots per plot produced by the ecotypes ranged from 5 to 54 and shoot height ranged from 69 to 126 cm. Ecotypes spread laterally at different rates, with the most aggressive covering 19 times more ground area than the least aggressive. Total shoot dry weight accumulation varied greatly among ecotypes. Some ecotypes could be identified from others by their unique leaf shape. Shoot number, shoot height, and ground area covered were greater for plants grown in Michigan than in Illinois. Differences in growth and morphological characteristics among ecotypes were not correlated with the geographical region where they were collected. Differences in measurements between the two nurseries illustrate the role of environment and genetics in the growth and morphology of this plant species.

Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Alcantara, E. N., Wyse, D. L., and Spitzmueller, J. M. 1989. Quackgrass (Agropyron repens) biotype response to sethoxydim and haloxyfop. Weed Sci. 37: 107111.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. 1936. An experimental study of hybridization on the genus Apocynum . Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 23: 159169.Google Scholar
Balbach, H. E. 1965. Variation and speciation in populations of Apocynaceae in North America. . University of Illinois at Urban Champaign, Urbana, IL, pp. 12.Google Scholar
Baskerville, G. L. and Emin, P. 1969. Rapid estimation of heat accumulation from maximum and minimum temperatures. Ecology 50: 514517.Google Scholar
Burnside, O. C., Wilson, R. G., Weisberg, S., and Hubbard, K. G. 1996. Seed longevity of 41 weed species buried 17 years in eastern and western Nebraska. Weed Sci. 44: 7486.Google Scholar
Costa, J. and Appleby, A. P. 1976. Response of two yellow nutsedge varieties to three herbicides. Weed Sci. 24: 5458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984a. Differential susceptibility of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes to glyphosate. Weed Sci. 32: 472476.Google Scholar
Degennaro, F. P. and Weller, S. C. 1984b. Growth and reproductive characteristics of field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis) biotypes. Weed Sci. 32: 525528.Google Scholar
Glenn, S. and Anderson, N. G. 1993. Hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) and wild blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis) control in no-tillage corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 7: 4751.Google Scholar
Harvey, S. J., Nowierski, R. M., Mahlberg, P. G., and Story, J. M. 1988. Taxonomie evaluation of leaf and latex variability of leafy spurge (Euphorbia spp.) for Montana and European accessions. Weed Res. 36: 726733.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. M. 1964. Variations in ecotypes of Canada thistle. Weeds 12: 167171.Google Scholar
Holt, J. S. 1994. Genetic variation in life history traits in yellow nutsedge (Cyperus esculentus) from California. Weed Sci. 42: 378384.Google Scholar
Hume, L. and Cavers, P. B. 1982. Geographic variation in the widespread perennial weed, Rumex crispus . The relative amounts of genetic and environmentally induced variation among populations. Can. J. Bot. 60: 19281937.Google Scholar
Klingaman, T. E. and Oliver, L. R. 1996. Existence of ecotypes among populations of entireleaf morningglory (Ipomea hederacea var. integriuscula). Weed Sci. 44: 540544.Google Scholar
Loux, M. M. and Berry, M. A. 1991. Use of a grower survey for estimating weed problems. Weed Technol. 5: 460466.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Jordan, T. N. 1976. Comparative morphological development of six johnsongrass ecotypes. Weed Sci. 24: 270275.Google Scholar
Robison, L. R. and Jeffery, L. S. 1972. Hemp dogbane growth and control. Weed Sci. 20: 156159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979a. Distribution, competition, and phenology of hemp dogbane (Apocynum cannabinum) in Nebraska. Weed Sci. 27: 565570.Google Scholar
Schultz, M. E. and Burnside, O. C. 1979b. Control of hemp dogbane with foliar and soil applied herbicides. Agron. J. 71: 723729.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. 1985. Principles of weed control for reduced-tillage corn production. Pages 2640 in Weise, A. F., ed. Weed Control in Limited Tillage Systems. Champaign, II.: Weed Science Society of America Mongr. 2.Google Scholar
Triplett, G. B. Jr. and Lytle, G. D. 1972. Control and ecology of weeds in continuous corn grown without tillage. Weed Sci. 20: 453457.Google Scholar
Westra, P. H. and Wyse, D. L. 1981. Growth and development of quackgrass (Agropyron repens) biotypes. Weed Sci. 29: 4452.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, R. E. 1980. Ecotypic variation of Tamarix pentandra epicuticular wax and possible relationship with hetbicide sensitivity. Weed Sci. 29: 110113.Google Scholar
Woodson, R. E. Jr. 1930. Studies in the Apocynaceae I. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 17: 1212.Google Scholar