Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T04:35:08.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Metribuzin Absorption and Translocation in Two Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Cultivars

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Stanislaw W. Gawronski ,
Lloyd C. Haderlie  and
Jeffrey C. Stark
Stanislaw W. Gawronski
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Lloyd C. Haderlie
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Jeffrey C. Stark
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Aberdeen, ID 83210
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Root and foliar absorption and translocation of 14C-metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one] were determined in tolerant (‘Steptoe’) and susceptible (‘Morex’) barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars grown in nutrient solution culture under greenhouse conditions. Root-applied metribuzin toxicity to the two barley cultivars was also examined. A 50% reduction in growth occurred at 0.22 and 0.72 μM metribuzin for Morex and Steptoe, respectively. Root absorption was similar for both cultivars at 1 day, but Steptoe absorbed about two times more metribuzin 4 and 8 days after application than did Morex. Steptoe absorbed 19% of the total applied metribuzin by 8 days. Root absorption was positively correlated with water uptake (r≥ 0.87). Leaf absorption was three times greater for Morex than for Steptoe after 4 days. Transport to leaves from root application was rapid, and, by 1 and 8 days, leaves of Steptoe contained 71 and 82% and leaves of Morex 78 and 84% of the total absorbed 14C, respectively. Translocation was apoplastic following both root and leaf absorption and was similar for both cultivars. Differential tolerance could partially be accounted for by differences in foliar absorption but not by differences in root absorption.

Keywords

Herbicidecerealherbicide susceptibility
Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Information
Weed Science , Volume 34 , Issue 4 , July 1986 , pp. 491 - 495
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Brinkman, M A., Langer, D. K., and Harvey, R. G. 1980. Response of barley, spring wheat, and oats to atrazine. Crop Sci. 20:319–322.Google Scholar
2. Fedtke, C. and Schmidt, R. R. 1983. Behavior of metribuzin in tolerant and susceptible soybean varieties, Pages 177–182 in Miyamoto, J. and Kearney, P. C., eds. Pesticide Chemistry. Human Welfare and Environment. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Pestic. Chem. Vol. 3. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
3. Fortino, J. Jr. and Splittstoesser, W. E. 1974. Response of tomato to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 22:460–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Gawronski, S. W., Haderlie, L. C., Callihan, R. H., and Dwelle, R. B. 1985. Metribuzin absorption, translocation, and distribution in two potato cultivars. Weed Sci. 33:629–634.Google Scholar
5. Haderlie, L. C., Stark, J. C., Gawronski, S. W., and Wesenberg, D. M. 1983. Barley variety tolerance to metribuzin. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Page 15.Google Scholar
6. Hargroder, T. G. and Rogers, R. L. 1974. Behavior and fate of metribuzin in soybean and hemp sesbania. Weed Sci. 22:238–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Hilton, H. W., Nomura, N. S., Yuger, W. L. Jr., and Kameda, S. 1974. Absorption, translocation, and metabolism of metribuzin (BAY-94337) in sugarcane. J. Agric. Food Chem. 22:578–582.Google Scholar
8. Mangeot, B. L., Slife, F. W., and Rieck, C. E. 1979. Differential metabolism of metribuzin by two soybean (Glycine max) cultivars. Weed Sci. 27:267–269.Google Scholar
9. Maun, M. A. and McLeod, W. J. 1978. Absorption and metabolism of metribuzin in barnyardgrass and American nightshade. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:485–491.Google Scholar
10. Pocock, R. L. 1980. Metribuzin as a barley herbicide. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 33:84.Google Scholar
11. SAS Institute Inc., SAS User's Guide:Statistics. 1982 Ed. Cary, NC:SAS Institute Inc. 1982. Pages 15–37.Google Scholar
12. Smith, A. E. and Wilkinson, R. E. 1974. Differential absorption, translocation and metabolism of metribuzin by soybean cultivars. Physiol. Plant. 32:253–257.Google Scholar
13. Yamaguchi, S. and Crafts, A. S. 1958. Autoradiographic method for studying absorption and translocation of herbicides using 14C labeled compounds. Hilgardia 28:161–191.Google Scholar