Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Maternal and Burial Environment Effects on Seed Mortality of Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) and Giant Foxtail (Setaria faberi)

  • Brian J. Schutte (a1), Adam S. Davis (a1), Karen A. Renner (a2) and John Cardina (a3)

Abstract

The primary defense against seed mortality, the seed coat, is maternally derived. Hence, weed seed mortality in the soil seedbank is likely to be influenced by the maternal environment and genetics. We hypothesized that seed accessions from contrasting maternal environments (seed lots) exhibit different rates of seed mortality and that the relative differences among seed lots remain consistent across burial environments. Velvetleaf and giant foxtail annual seed mortality rates were studied in field experiments in Hickory Corners, MI, and Wooster, OH, using seed lots collected from the same locations. Seeds enclosed within mesh bags and unenclosed seeds (“seeded cores”) exhibited similar levels of seedbank persistence (r = 0.90, P < 0.001) and seed mortality (r = 0.65, P = 0.006). Annual seed mortality rates ranged from 16 to 56% and 27 to 91% for seed lots of velvetleaf and giant foxtail, respectively. Relative differences among velvetleaf seed lots were consistent across burial environments in both years, whereas giant foxtail differences were consistent in only 1 of 2 yr. The relative ranks among velvetleaf seed lots varied between years, indicating that maternal environment may have influenced seed persistence more than seed-lot genetics. Within years, variation in seed mortality was predicted by changes in soil moisture in the burial environment (R 2 = 0.47, P < 0.001 for velvetleaf; R 2 = 0.34, P = 0.007 for giant foxtail). Accelerated seed mortality was associated with moist soils (soil water potential = −6 kPa for velvetleaf, −7 kPa for giant foxtail). These results suggest that agronomic practices affecting the maternal environment and moisture levels in the soil seedbank may promote weed seed mortality in the soil seedbank.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail: brian.schutte@ars.usda.gov

References

Hide All
Benvenuti, S. 2007. Weed seed movement and dispersal strategies in the agricultural environment. Weed Biol. Manag. 7:141157.
Bewley, J. D. and Black, M. 1994. Seeds Physiology of Development and Germination. New York Plenum. 445 p.
Bradford, K. J. 1996. Population-based models describing seed dormancy behavior: implications for experimental design and interpretation. Pages 313339. in Lang, G. A. Plant Dormancy: Physiology, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. New York CABI.
Bridges, D. C. and Baumann, P. A. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. Pages 75147. in Bridges, D. C. Crop Losses Due to Weeds in the United States. Champaign, IL Weed Science Society of America.
Buhler, D. D. and Hartzler, R. G. 2001. Emergence and persistence of seed of velvetleaf, common waterhemp, woolly cupgrass, and giant foxtail. Weed Sci. 49:230235.
Cardina, J. and Sparrow, D. H. 1997. Temporal changes in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seed dormancy. Weed Sci. 45:6166.
Chee-Sanford, J. C., Williams, M. M., Davis, A. S., and Sims, G. K. 2006. Do microorganisms influence seed-bank dynamics. Weed Sci. 54:575587.
Cousens, R. and Mortimer, M. 1995. Dynamics of Weed Populations. New York Cambridge University Press. 332 p.
Davis, A. S. 2006. When does it make sense to target the weed seed bank. Weed Sci. 54:558565.
Davis, A. S. 2007. Nitrogen fertilizer and crop residue effects on seed mortality and germination of eight annual weed species. Weed Sci. 55:123128.
Davis, A. S., Cardina, J., Forcella, F., et al. 2005. Environmental factors affecting seed persistence of annual weeds across the U.S. corn belt. Weed Sci. 53:860868.
Dekker, J. 2003. The foxtail (Setaria) species-group. Weed Sci. 51:641656.
Donohue, K. and Schmitt, J. 1998. Maternal environmental effects in plants: adaptive plasticity. Pages 137158. in Mousseau, T. A. and Fox, C. W. Maternal Effects as Adaptations. New York Oxford University Press.
Dorne, A. J. 1981. Variation in seed germination inhibition of Chenopodium bonus-henricus in relation to altitude of plant growth. Can. J. Bot. 59:18931901.
Edwards, L. K. 1993. Applied Analysis of Variance in Behavioral Science. New York Marcel Dekker. 628 p.
Egley, G. H. and Chandler, J. M. 1978. Germination and viability of weed seeds after 2.5 years in a 50-year buried seed study. Weed Sci. 26:230239.
Ellery, A. J. and Chapman, R. 2000. Embryo and seed coat factors produce seed dormancy in capeweed (Arctotheca calendula). Aust. J. Agric. Res. 51:849854.
Fenner, M. and Thompson, K. 2005. The Ecology of Seeds. New York Cambridge University Press. 250 p.
Flerchinger, G. N. and Saxton, K. E. 1989. Simultaneous heat and water model of a freezing snow-residue-soil system: I. theory and development. Trans. ASAE. 32:573578.
Gallandt, E. R., Liebman, M., and Huggins, D. R. 1999. Improving soil quality: implications for weed management. Pages 95122. in Buhler, D. D. Expanding the Context of Weed Management. New York Food Products.
Gummerson, R. J. 1986. The effect of constant temperatures and osmotic potentials on the germination of sugar beet. J. Exp. Bot. 37:729741.
Hartzler, R. G., Buhler, D. D., and Stoltenberg, D. E. 1999. Emergence characteristics of four annual weed species. Weed Sci. 47:578584.
Horowitz, M. and Taylorson, R. B. 1985. Behavior of hard and permeable seeds of Abutilon theophrasti Medic (velvetleaf). Weed Res. 25:363372.
Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S. 2000. Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd ed. New York J. Wiley. 375 p.
Kremer, R. J. 1986. Antimicrobial activity of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Sci. 34:617622.
Kremer, R. J. 1993. Management of weed seed banks with microorganisms. Ecol. Appl. 3:4252.
Kremer, R. J., Hughes, L. B., and Aldrich, R. J. 1984. Examination of microorganisms and deterioration resistance mechanisms associated with velvetleaf seed. Agron. J. 76:745749.
Lacroix, L. J. and Staniforth, D. W. 1964. Seed dormancy in velvetleaf. Weeds. 12:171174.
Lambers, H., Chapin, F. S. III, and Pons, T. L. 1998. Plant Physiological Ecology. New York Springer-Verlag. 540 p.
Mayer, D. G. and Butler, D. G. 1993. Statistical validation. Ecol. Model. 68:2132.
Mickelson, J. A. and Grey, W. E. 2006. Effect of soil water content on wild oat (Avena fatua) seed mortality and seedling emergence. Weed Sci. 54:255262.
Mohamed-Yasseen, Y., Barringer, S. A., Splittstoesser, W. E., and Costanza, S. 1994. The role of seed coats in seed viability. Bot. Rev. 60:427439.
Mohler, C. L. 2001. Mechanical management of weeds. Pages 139209. in Liebman, M., Mohler, C. L., and Staver, C. P. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds. New York Cambridge University Press.
Mohler, C. L., Frisch, J. C., and McCulloch, C. E. 2006. Vertical movement of weed seed surrogates by tillage implements and natural processes. Soil Tillage Res. 26:110122.
Mousseau, T. A. and Fox, C. W. 1998. The adaptive significance of maternal effects. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13:403407.
Neter, J., Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., and Wasserman, W. 1996. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Chicago, IL Irwin. 1408 p.
Nurse, R. E. and DiTommaso, A. 2005. Corn competition alters the germinability of velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seeds. Weed Sci. 53:479488.
Orozco-Segovia, A., Brechu-Franco, A. E., Zambrano-Polanco, L., Osuna-Fernandez, R., Laguna-Hernandez, G., and Sanchez-Coronado, M. E. 2000. Effects of maternal light environment on germination and morphological characteristics of Sicyos deppei seeds. Weed Res. 40:495506.
Papi, M., Sabatini, S., Altamura, M. M., Hennig, L., Schafer, E., Costantino, P., and Vittorioso, P. 2002. Inactivation of the phloem-specific Dof zinc finger gene DAG1 affects response to light and integrity of the testa of Arabidopsis seeds. Plant Physiol. 128:411417.
Peters, J. 2000. Tetrazolium testing handbook. Contribution 29. in. The Handbook on Seed Testing. Lincoln, NE Association of Official Seed Analysts.
Schafer, M. and Kotanen, P. M. 2003. The influence of soil moisture on losses of buried seeds to fungi. Acta Oecol. 24:255263.
Shumway, D. L. and Koide, R. 1994. Seed preferences of Lumbricus terrestris L. Appl. Soil. Ecol. 1:1115.
Skoglund, J. and Verwijst, T. 1989. Age structure of woody species populations in relation to seed rain, germination and establishment along the river Dalälven, Sweden. Vegetatio. 82:2534.
Teo-Sherrell, C. P. A., Mortensen, D. A., and Keaton, M. E. 1996. Fates of weed seeds in soil: a seeded core method of study. J. Appl. Ecol. 33:11071113.
Thompson, K. 2000. The functional ecology of soil seed banks. Pages 215236. in Fenner, M. Seeds: The Ecology of Regeneration in Plant Communities. New York CABI.
Van Mourik, T., Stomph, T., and Murdoch, A. 2005. Why high seed densities within buried meshbags may overestimate depletion rates of soil seed banks. J. Appl. Ecol. 42:299305.
Wiles, L. J., Barlin, D. H., Schweizer, E. E., Duke, H. R., and Whitt, D. E. 1996. A new soil sampler and elutriator for collecting and extracting weed seeds from soil. Weed Technol. 10:3541.
Winter, D. M. 1960. The development of the seed of Abutilon theophrasti, II: seed coat. Am. J. Bot. 47:157162.
Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ Prentice Hall. 663 p.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed