Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T11:15:44.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of weeds on insecticide deposition and soybean looper (Pseudoplusia includens) management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Charles F. Grymes ,
James L. Griffin ,
B. Rogers Leonard ,
David L. Jordan  and
David J. Boethel
Charles F. Grymes
Affiliation:
Department of Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 302 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803. Current address: Zeneca Ag Products, 2808 East Allendale, Victoria, TX 77901
B. Rogers Leonard
Affiliation:
Macon Ridge Research Station, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 212 Macon Ridge Road, Winnsboro, LA 71295-5719
David L. Jordan
Affiliation:
Crop Science Department, North Carolina State University, Box 7620, Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
David J. Boethel
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, 402 Life Sciences Building, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Glycine max fields with Sesbania exaltata and Senna obtusifolia were selected to evaluate weed effects on insecticide spray droplet deposition within the crop canopy and soybean looper (Pseudoplusia includens) mortality. Weedy and weed-free treatments with and without thiodicarb insecticide application were included. Soybean looper populations in plots with S. exaltata and S. obtusiolia were approximately half those found in weed-free plots. Thiodicarb reduced soybean looper larval survival in the absence of weeds or when weeds were present in three of four experiments. Dye-sensitive cards placed in the top, middle, and bottom thirds of the G. max canopy showed droplet coverage to be highest on cards placed in the top of the canopy. Weeds reduced insecticide coverage in the top of the G. max canopy 26 to 43%. Thiodicarb deposition within the middle and bottom levels of the canopy was not reduced by weeds. Leaflets from the top, middle, and bottom thirds of the crop canopy were collected immediately after insecticide application to bioassay for insecticide deposition. For both years, mortality of soybean looper larvae on leaflets collected from the middle or top of weedy and weed-free G. max treated with thiodicarb was equivalent. Assuming that an economic return can be expected, soybean looper management may not need to be altered when moderate infestations of S. exaltata and S. obtusifolia are present in G. max in late season.

Keywords

Sesbania exaltata (Raf.) Rybd. ex A.W. Hill SEBEX, hemp sesbaniaSenna obtusifolia (L.) Irwin et Barneby CASOB, sicklepodsoybean looper, Pseudoplusia includens (Walker)Glycine max (L.) Merr. ‘Asgrow 6785’ and ‘DPL 3627’, soybeanthiodicarb.Pest managementpest complexesmultiple pestsweed-insect interactionsCASOBSEBEX
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , June 1999 , pp. 321 - 326
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anonymous. Weed Identification Guide. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Baldwin, J. L., Boethel, D. J., and Leonard, B. R. 1996. Control G. max Insects 1996. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Publ. 2211. 16 pp.Google Scholar
Bozsa, R. C., Oliver, L. R., and Driver, T. L. 1989. Intraspecific and interspecific sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia) interference. Weed Sci. 37:670–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridges, D. C. and Baumann, P. A. 1992. Weeds causing losses in the United States. Pages 75–147 in Bridges, D. C., ed. Crop Losses Due To Weeds 1992. Champaign, IL: Weed Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Fehr, W R., Caviness, C. E., Burmood, D. T., and Pennington, J. S. 1971. Stage of development descriptions for soybeans Glycine max (L.) Merrill. Crop Sci. 11:929–931.Google Scholar
Herzog, D. C. 1980. Sampling soybean looper on G. max . Pages 141–168 in Kogan, M. and Herzog, D. C., eds. Sampling Methods in G. max Entomology. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchins, S. H. and Pitre, H. N. 1984. Effects of soybean row spacing on spray penetration and efficacy of insecticides applied with ground and aerial equipment. Environ. Entomol. 13:948–953.Google Scholar
Kogan, M. and Pitre, H. N. Jr. 1980. General sampling methods for aboveground populations of soybean arthropods. Pages 30–60 in Kogan, M. and Herzog, D. C., eds. Sampling Methods in Soybean Entomology. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leonard, B. R., Boethel, D. J., Sparks, A. N. Jr., Layton, M. B., Mink, J. S., Pavloff, A. M., Burris, E., and Graves, J. B. 1990. Variations in response of soybean looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to selected insecticides in Louisiana. J. Econ. Entomol. 83:27–34.Google Scholar
McWhorter, C. G. and Anderson, J. M. 1979. Hemp sesbania (Sesbania exaltata) competition in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Sci. 27:58–64.Google Scholar
Royal, S. S., Brecke, B. J., Shokes, F. M., and Colvin, D. L. 1997. Influence of broadleaf weeds on chlorothalonil deposition, foliar disease incidence, and peanut (Arachis hypogaea) yield. Weed Technol. 11:51–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1985. SAS User's Guide: Basics. Version 5 Edition. Gary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1292 p.Google Scholar
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Release 6.03 Edition. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. 1028 p.Google Scholar
Shepard, M., Carner, G. R., and Turnipseed, S. G. 1977. Colonization and resurgence of insect pests of soybean in response to insecticides and field isolation. Environ. Entomol. 6:501–506.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. D., Mink, J. S., and Boethel, D. J. 1993. Diet influences in permethrin susceptibility and growth of soybean looper larvae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 86:1236–1240.Google Scholar
Thomson, W. T. 1982. Agricultural Chemicals: Book I. Insecticides. Fresno, CA: Thomson Publ. 294 pp.Google Scholar
Wegenhoft, K. N. 1996. Costs of producing soybean in Louisiana. Pages 30–38 in Honeycutt, J., ed. Louisiana Soybean Handbook. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service Publ. 2624.Google Scholar
Wier, A. T. and Boethel, D. J. 1996. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and yield of soybean following defoliation by soybean looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) during pod or seed development. J. Econ. Entomol. 89:525–535.Google Scholar