Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T20:13:08.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Influence of Organosilicone Surfactants and Spray Nozzle Types on the Fate and Efficacy of Clopyralid on Honey Mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Rodney W. Bovey
Affiliation:
Dep. Rangeland Ecol. & Mgmt., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Headquarters: Weed Sci. Lab., Beltsville, MD
Eric Franz
Affiliation:
Dep. Rangeland Ecol. & Mgmt., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Headquarters: Weed Sci. Lab., Beltsville, MD
Steven G. Whisenant
Affiliation:
Dep. Rangeland Ecol. & Mgmt., Texas A&M Univ., College Station, Headquarters: Weed Sci. Lab., Beltsville, MD

Abstract

Greenhouse and laboratory experiments were conducted to evaluate the influence of two organosilicone surfactants and spray nozzle types on the spray deposition, absorption, translocation, and efficacy of the monoethanolamine salt of clopyralid on honey mesquite. Sylgard 309 or Silwet L-77 added to the spray solution at 0.1, 025 and 0.5% by vol did not increase spray deposition, absorption, translocation, or phytotoxicity of clopyralid applied at 140 g ae ha-1 on honey mesquite compared to no surfactant An air-assist spray nozzle at 9.4 L ha-1 by vol resulted in greater initial clopyralid deposit on honey mesquite than hydraulic nozzles at 9.4 or 187 L ha-1 by vol, but air-assist application did not increase phytotoxicity compared to hydraulic nozzles.

Type
Special Topics
Copyright
Copyright © 1994 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bouse, L. F. and Bovey, R. W. 1967. A laboratory sprayer for potted plants. Weeds 15:8991.Google Scholar
2. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., Meyer, R. E., and Bouse, L. F. 1987. Influence of adjuvants on the deposit, absorption, and translocation of clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Sci. 35:253258.Google Scholar
3. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., and Meyer, R. E. 1988. Phytotoxicity and uptake of clopyralid in honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa) as affected by adjuvants and other herbicides. Weed Sci. 36:2023.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Hein, H. Jr., Keeney, F. N., and Whisenant, S. G. 1990. Phytotoxicity and transport of clopyralid from three formulations in honey mesquite. J. Plant Growth Regul. 9:6569.Google Scholar
5. Bovey, R. W., Stermer, R. A., and Bouse, L. F. 1990. Spray deposition of clopyralid on honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa). Weed Technol. 5:499503.Google Scholar
6. Cotterill, E. G. 1978. Determination of 3,6-dichloropiclonic acid residues in soil by gas chromatography of the 1-butylester. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 15:471474.Google Scholar
7. Field, R. J., Dobson, N. N., and Tisdall, L. J. 1992. Species-specific sensitivity to organosilicone surfactants—enhancement of glyphosate uptake. Pages 423431 in Foy, C. L., ed., Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
8. Franz, E. 1990. Progress towards a machine vision system for spray-deposit analysis: software development. ASAE Paper No. 90-7515. ASAE, St. Joseph, MI.Google Scholar
9. Gaskins, R. E. and Zabkiewicz, J. A. 1992. Effect of plant age and adjuvant addition on the foliar penetration and translocation of glyphosate in pampas grass (Cortadena silloana). Pages 405409 in Foy, C. L. ed. Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
10. Hanks, J. E. and McWhorter, C. G. 1991. Variables affecting the use of positive displacement pumps to apply herbicide in ultralow volume. Weed Technol. 5:111116.Google Scholar
11. Jansen, L. L. 1973. Enhancement of herbicides by silicone surfactants. Weed Sci. 21:130135.Google Scholar
12. Roggenbuck, F. C., Rowe, L., Penner, D., Burow, R. F., Ekeland, R. A., and Petroff, L. J. 1989. Use of silicone adjuvants to increase activity and rainfastness of acifluorfen. Pages 219224 in Proc. Brighton Crop Prot. Conf., Weeds.Google Scholar
13. Roggenbuck, F. C., Rowe, L., Penner, D., Petroff, J. L., and Burow, R. E. 1990. Increasing postemergence herbicide efficacy and rainfastness with silicone adjuvants. Weed Technol. 4:576580.Google Scholar
14. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 p.Google Scholar
15. Stevens, P.J.G., Gaskin, R. E., Hong, S. O., and Zabkiewicz, J. A. 1992. Pathways and mechanisms of foliar uptake as influenced by surfactants. Pages 385398 in Foy, C. L., ed., Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
16. Sundaram, A. 1992. Influence of two polymeric adjuvants on bioavailability of glyphosate in Vison formulation: Relevance to rainwashing of deposits from foliar surfaces. Pages 7785 in Foy, C. L., ed., Adjuvants for Agrichemicals. CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
17. Whisenant, S. G., Bouse, L. F., Crane, R. A., and Bovey, R. W. 1993. Droplet size and spray volume effects on honey mesquite mortality with clopyralid. J. Range Manage. 46:257260.Google Scholar