Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T06:38:45.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Application Time on Clomazone Activity in No-Till Soybeans, Glycine max

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Virginia L. Werling  and
Douglas D. Buhler
Virginia L. Werling
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Douglas D. Buhler
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Clomazone at 0.7 kg ai/ha or more, applied early preplant, completely controlled weeds before planting of no-till soybeans. Under low weed density (57 plants/m2 in untreated control) in 1985, grass weed control was nearly complete and not affected by clomazone application time. Late-season broadleaf weed control was less with preemergence application of clomazone at 1.1 or 1.4 kg/ha than with an early preplant or early preplant-preemergence split application of the same clomazone rate. Addition of metribuzin at 0.2 kg ai/ha overcame this control deficiency. Under greater weed densities (330 plants/m2 in untreated control) during 1986 and 1987, early preplant-preemergence split applications gave the greatest control of both grass and broadleaf weeds throughout the growing season. Preemergence application of clomazone failed to completely control common lambsquarters emerged at the time of application. Early preplant applications failed to maintain redroot pigweed control throughout the season. Differences in soybean yield were attributed to differences in weed control. No significant carryover of clomazone residue was detected through greenhouse or field bioassays.

Keywords

Clomazone, 2- [(2-chlorophenyl)methyl] -4,4-dimethyl-3-isoxazolidinonemetribuzin, 4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-onecommon lambsquarters, Chenopodium album L. #3 CHEALredroot pigweed, Amaranthus retfoflexus L. # AMAREsoybean, Glycine max (L.) MerrConservation tillageearly preplantherbicide carryovermetribuzinABUTHAMARECHEALPOLPESETFA
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 36 , Issue 5 , September 1988 , pp. 629 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Banks, P. A. and Robinson, E. L. 1982. The influence of straw mulch on the soil reception and persistence of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 30:164–168.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. 1985. Early preplant and split herbicide applications for weed control in no-till and reduced tillage corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 49:48.Google Scholar
3. Cogo, N. P., Moldenhauer, W. C., and Foster, G. R. 1984. Soil loss reductions from conservation tillage practices. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 48:368–373.Google Scholar
4. Connell, J. T. and Derting, C. W. 1973. Glyphosate performance on johnsongrass and associated weed species in no-till soybeans. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 26:51–58.Google Scholar
5. Christensen, L. A. and Magleby, R. S. 1983. Conservation tillage use. J. Soil Water Conserv. 38:156–157.Google Scholar
6. Halstead, S. J. and Harvey, R. G. 1985. Factors affecting offsite movement of FMC-57020. Proc. North Central Weed Control Conf. 40:88.Google Scholar
7. Hartwig, R. O. and Laflen, J. M. 1978. A meterstick method for measuring crop residue cover. J. Soil Water Conserv. 33:90–91.Google Scholar
8. Hopper, D. M. 1986. FMC - 57020 – 1985 EUP/TT results. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 40:78.Google Scholar
9. Kells, J. J. 1984. Early preplant herbicide applications in no-till corn and soybeans. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:42–43.Google Scholar
10. Koshkinen, W. C. and McWhorter, C. G. 1986. Weed control in conservation tillage. J. Soil Water Conserv. 41:365–370.Google Scholar
11. Mester, T. C. and Buhler, D. D. 1986. Effects of tillage on the depth of giant foxtail germination and population densities. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:4.Google Scholar
12. Raubaudo, M. O. 1986. Reducing soil erosion: offsite benefits. U.S. Dep. Agric. Econ. Rpt. No. 561.Google Scholar
13. Sandman, G. and Boger, P. 1987. Inhibition of prenyl-lipid biosynthesis by dimethazone. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. No. 175.Google Scholar
14. Salisbury, F. B. and Ross, C. W. 1985. Plant Physiology. Wadsworth Publishing Co., Belmont, CA. 540 pp.Google Scholar
15. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar
16. Stougaard, R. N., Kapusta, G., and Roskamp, G. 1984. Early preplant applications for no-till soybean (Glycine max) weed control. Weed Sci. 32:293–298.Google Scholar