Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T14:43:43.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of Application Method on the Activity of Butylate and EPTC in Reduced-Tillage Corn (Zea mays)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Douglas D. Buhler
Douglas D. Buhler*
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron., Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Weed control in reduced-tillage corn (Zea mays L. ‘Pioneer 3732′) with butylate [S-ethyl bis(2-methylpropyl) carbamothioate] and EPTC (S-ethyl dipropyl carbarnothioate) was not reduced when these herbicides were applied jointly with dry or liquid fertilizer. In most cases, application with fertilizer resulted in weed control similar to that observed when the herbicide was applied in water at 285 L/ha. Butylate applied as a granular formulation also gave weed control similar to the spray at 285 L/ha. Application in 95 L/ha of water consistently resulted in reduced weed control. Corn injury was not greatly influenced by application method, and differences in corn yield appeared to be due to differences in weed control. Growth chamber bioassays indicated that both butylate and EPTC dissipated more rapidly when applied in 95 L/ha of water than the other application methods, which may explain differences in weed control observed in the field.

Keywords

Carrier volumedry fertilizergranular herbicidesherbicide dissipationliquid fertilizer
Type
Weed Control and Herbicide Technology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , May 1987 , pp. 412 - 417
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Anonymous. 1983. Herbicide Handbook, 5th ed. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., Champaign, IL. 515 pp.Google Scholar
2. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1983. Effect of spray components on glyphosate toxicity to annual grasses. Weed Sci. 31:124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Buhler, D. D. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Effect of application factors on postemergence phytotoxicity of fluazifop-butyl, haloxyfop-methyl, and sethoxydim. Weed Sci. 32:574–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Dawson, J. H. 1980. Selective weed control from EPTC applied with seed of alfalfa (Medicago sativa). Weed Sci. 28:607–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Draper, N. R. and Smith, H. 1981. Applied Regression Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 709 pp.Google Scholar
6. Hartley, G. S. 1976. Physical behaviour in the soil. Pages 1–28 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides: Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. Vol. 2. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
7. Hartwig, N. L. and Hoffman, L. D. 1982. Weed control with butylate impregnated on fertilizer in corn. Proc. Norhteast. Weed Sci. Soc. 36:52–54.Google Scholar
8. Hartwig, R. O. and Laflen, J. M. 1978. A meterstick method for measuring crop residue cover. J. Soil Water Conserv. 33:90–91.Google Scholar
9. Hayes, W. A. 1982. Minimum Tillage Farming. No-Till Farmer, Inc., Brookfield, WI. 167 pp.Google Scholar
10. Hurle, K. and Walker, A. 1980. Persistence and its prediction. Pages 83–122 in Nance, R. J., ed. Interactions between Herbicides and the Soil. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
11. Johnson, M. D., Wyse, D. L., and Lueschen, W. E. 1984. The influence of herbicide formulation on weed control in reduced tillage systems. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:49–50.Google Scholar
12. Martens, A. R., Burnside, O. C., and Cramer, G. L. 1978. Compatibility and phytotoxicity of herbicide-fertilizer combinations. Agron. J. 70:1089–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Menkveld, J. W. and Dekker, J. H. 1985. Soil acclimatization to butylate in Ontario: comparison of degrradation rates in history soils and adjacent fields. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., No. 251.Google Scholar
14. Moyer, J. R., Chow, P.N.P., and Dryden, R. D. 1981. Triallate herbicide application with dry and solution nitrogen fertilizers. Can. J. Plant Sci. 61:107–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Sander, K. W. and Burnside, O. C. 1984. Weed control with butylate in water versus butylate in 28-0-0 liquid fertilizer at two nitrogen rates in corn. Res. Rep. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 41:412.Google Scholar
16. Skoglund, J. H. and Gandrud, D. E. 1984. Results of 1983 and 1984 data comparing herbicidal effectiveness of granules, liquids, and dry flowables applied dry in corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 39:47–48.Google Scholar
17. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York. 633 pp.Google Scholar
18. Wilkinson, R. E. 1986. Terpenoid biosynthesis as a site of action for herbicide safeners. Abstr. Weed Sci. Soc. Am., No. 202.Google Scholar
19. Witt, W. W. 1984. Response of weeds and herbicides under no-tillage conditions. Pages 152–170 in Phillips, R. E. and Phillips, S. H., eds. No-Tillage Agriculture. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar