Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-wq484 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T15:06:36.864Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identification of glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in Oregon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Kee Woong Park
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3002
Jed Colquhoun
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3002
Carol Mallory-Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331-3002
Dale Shaner
Affiliation:
USDA-ARS Water Management Unit, Fort Collins, CO 80526-8119

Abstract

A suspected glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass biotype was collected from a filbert orchard near Portland, OR, where glyphosate was applied multiple times per year for about 15 yr. Greenhouse studies were conducted to determine if this biotype was glyphosate resistant. The plants were sprayed with glyphosate (0.01 to 3.37 kg ae ha−1) 14 d after planting and shoot biomass was determined 3 wk after herbicide treatment. Based on the dose–response experiments conducted in the greenhouse, the suspected Italian ryegrass biotype was approximately fivefold more resistant to glyphosate than the susceptible biotype. Plants from both susceptible and resistant biotypes were treated with glyphosate (0.42 and 0.84 kg ha−1) and shikimic acid was extracted 12, 24, 48, and 96 h after treatment. The susceptible biotype accumulated between three and five times more shikimic acid than did the resistant biotype. Leaf segments from both susceptible and resistant biotypes were incubated with different glyphosate concentrations (0.5 to 3000 μM) for 14 h under continuous light. Shikimic acid was extracted from each leaf segment and quantified. At a concentration up to 100 μM, leaf segments from the susceptible biotype accumulated more shikimic acid than leaf segments from the resistant biotype. The epsps gene was amplified and sequenced in both susceptible and resistant biotypes; however, no amino acid change was found in the resistant biotype. The level of resistance in this biotype is similar to that reported for a glyphosate-resistant Italian ryegrass biotype from Chile.

Type
Physiology, Chemistry, and Biochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Baerson, S. R., Rodriguez, D., Biest, N. A., Tran, M., You, J., Kreuger, R. W., Dill, G. M., Pratley, J. E., and Gruys, K. J. 2002a. Investigating the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Weed Sci 50:721730.Google Scholar
Baerson, S. R., Rodriguez, D., Tran, M., Feng, Y., Biest, N. A., and Dill, G. M. 2002b. Glyphosate-resistant goosegrass. Identification of a mutation in the target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase. Plant Physiol 129:12651275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baylis, A. 2000. Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects. Pest Manag. Sci 56:299308.Google Scholar
Bradshaw, L. D., Padgette, S. R., Kimball, S. L., and Wells, B. H. 1997. Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technol 11:189198.Google Scholar
Cromartie, T. H. and Polge, N. D. 2000. An improved assay for shikimic acid and its use as a monitor for the activity of sulfosate. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc. Am 40:291.Google Scholar
Devine, M. D. and Preston, C. 2000. The molecular basis of herbicide resistance. Pages 72104 in Cobb, A. H. and Kirkwood, R. C. eds. Herbicides and Their Mechanisms of Action. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Feng, P. C. C., Pratley, J. E., and Bohn, J. 1999. Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum. II. Uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Sci 47:412415.Google Scholar
Feng, P. C. C., Tran, M., Chiu, T., Sammons, R. D., Heck, G. R., and Cajacob, C. A. 2004. Investigations into glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis): retention, uptake, translocation, and metabolism. Weed Sci 52:498505.Google Scholar
Geiger, D. R. and Fuchs, M. A. 2002. Inhibitors of aromatic amino acid biosynthesis (glyphosate). Pages 5985 in Böger, P., Wakabayashi, K., and Hirai, K. eds. Herbicide Classes in Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Heap, I. M. 2005. International survey of herbicide-resistant weeds. www.weedscience.org. Accessed April 2005.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H., Poston, D. H., Hayes, R. M., and Montgomery, R. F. 2004. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed in Mississippi. Weed Technol 18:820825.Google Scholar
Koger, C. H. and Reddy, K. N. 2005. Role of absorption and translocation in the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in horseweed (Conyza canadensis). Weed Sci 53:8489.Google Scholar
Lee, L. J. and Ngim, J. 2000. A first report of glyphosate-resistant goosegrass (Eleusine indica (L) Gaertn) in Malaysia. Pest Manag. Sci 56:336339.Google Scholar
Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Powles, S. B., Hawkes, T. R., Hollinshead, P. H., Warner, S. A. J., and Preston, C. 2003. Investigations into the mechanism of glyphosate resistance in Lolium rigidum . Pestic. Biochem. Physiol 74:6272.Google Scholar
Main, C. L., Mueller, T. C., Hayes, R. M., and Wilkerson, J. B. 2004. Response of selected horseweed (Conyza canadensis (L.) Cronq.) populations to glyphosate. J. Agric. Food Chem 52:879883.Google Scholar
Mueller, T. C., Massey, J. H., Hayes, R. M., Main, C. L., and Stewart, C. N. 2003. Shikimate accumulates in both glyphosate-sensitive and glyphosate-resistant horseweed (Conyza canadensis L. Cronq). J. Agric. Food Chem 51:680684.Google Scholar
Ng, C. H., Wickneswari, R., Salmijah, S., Teng, Y. T., and Ismail, B. S. 2003. Gene polymorphisms in glyphosate-resistant and -susceptible biotypes of Eleusine indica from Malaysia. Weed Res 43:108115.Google Scholar
Padgette, S. R., Re, D. B., Barry, G. F., Eichholtz, D. E., Delannay, X., Fuchs, R. L., Kishore, G. M., and Fraley, R. T. 1996. Pages 5384 in Duke, S. O. ed. Herbicide Resistant Crops, Agricultural, Environmental, Economic, Regulatory, and Technical Aspects. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Perez, A. and Kogan, M. 2003. Glyphosate-resistant Lolium multiflorum in Chilean orchards. Weed Res 43:1219.Google Scholar
Perez-Jones, A., Park, K., Colquhoun, J., and Mallory-Smith, C. 2004. Glyphosate-resistant Lolium multiflorum in Oregon. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci 57:27.Google Scholar
Powles, S. B., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., Dellow, J. J., and Preston, C. 1998. Evolved resistance to glyphosate in rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in Australia. Weed Sci 46:604607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratley, J., Baines, P., Eberbach, P., Incerti, M., and Broster, J. 1996. Glyphosate resistance in annual ryegrass. Page 126 in Virgona, J. and Michalk, D. eds. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the Grassland Society of New South Wales. Wagga Wagga, Australia: The Grassland Society of New South Wales.Google Scholar
Pratley, J., Urwin, N., Stanton, R., Baines, P., Broster, J., Cullis, K., Schafer, D., Bohn, J., and Krueger, R. 1999. Resistance to glyphosate in Lolium rigidum. I. Bioevaluation. Weed Sci 47:405411.Google Scholar
Schönbrunn, E., Eschenburg, S., Shuttleworth, W. A., Schloss, J. V., Amrhein, N., Evans, J. N. S., and Kabsch, W. 2001. Interaction of the herbicide glyphosate with its target enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate 3-phosphate synthase in atomic detail. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 98:13761380.Google Scholar
Seefeldt, S. S., Jensen, J. E., and Fuerst, E. P. 1995. Log–logistic analysis of herbicide dose–response relationships. Weed Technol 9:218225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, B. A., Pollard, J. M., and Smeda, R. J. 2005. Two common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) biotypes differ in biology and response to glyphosate. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc 45:156.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L. 2000. The impact of glyphosate-tolerant crops on the use of other herbicides and on resistance management. Pest Manag. Sci 56:320326.Google Scholar
Shaner, D. L., Nadler-Hassar, T., Henry, B., and Koger, C. 2005. A rapid in vivo EPSPS assay with excised leaf discs in crops and weeds. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc 45:229.Google Scholar
Simarmata, M., Kaufmann, J. E., and Penner, D. 2003. Potential basis of glyphosate resistance in California rigid ryegrass (Lolium rigidum). Weed Sci 51:678682.Google Scholar
Singh, B. K. and Shaner, D. L. 1998. Rapid determination of glyphosate injury to plants and identification of glyphosate-resistant plants. Weed Technol 12:527530.Google Scholar
Streibig, J. C. 1988. Herbicide bioassay. Weed Res 28:479484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M., and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dose–response curves and statistical models. Pages 2956 in Streibig, J. C. and Kudsk, P. eds. Herbicide Bioassays. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.Google Scholar
Tran, M., Baerson, S., Brinker, R., Casagrande, L., Faletti, M., Feng, Y., Nemeth, M., Reynolds, T., Rodriguez, D., Shaffer, D., Stalker, D., Taylor, N., Teng, Y., and Dill, G. 1999. Characterization of glyphosate resistant Eleusine indica biotypes from Malaysia. Pages 527536 in Proceedings of the 17th Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society Conference. Bangkok: Asian-Pacific Weed Science Society.Google Scholar
Urbano, J. M., Borrego, A., Torres, V., Jimenez, C., Leon, J. M., and Barnes, J. 2005. Glyphosate-resistant hairy fleabane (Conyza bonariensis) in Spain. Proc. Weed Sci. Soc 45:394.Google Scholar
VanGessel, M. J. 2001. Glyphosate-resistant horseweed from Delaware. Weed Sci 49:703705.Google Scholar
Wakelin, A. M., Lorraine-Colwill, D. F., and Preston, C. 2004. Glyphosate resistance in four different populations of Lolium rigidum is associated with reduced translocation of glyphosate to meristematic zones. Weed Res 44:453459.Google Scholar
Woodburn, A. T. 2000. Glyphosate: production, pricing and use worldwide. Pest Manag. Sci 56:309312.3.0.CO;2-C>CrossRefGoogle Scholar