Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-nwzlb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-29T05:32:46.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Guidelines for Introducing Foreign Organisms into the United States for Biological Control of Weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Dayton L. Klingman
Affiliation:
Weed Sci. Lab., Agric. Environmental Quality Inst.
Jack R. Coulson
Affiliation:
Beneficial Insect Introduction Lab., Insect Identification and Beneficial Insect Introduction Inst., Beltsville Agric. Res. Center, Agric. Res. Serv., U.S. Dep. Agric., Beltsville, MD 20705

Extract

Research on biological control of weeds in the United States began early in this century with the use of introduced insects to control the weed, lantana (Lantana camara L.), in Hawaii. The highly successful program for biological control of St. Johnswort (sometimes called “Klamath weed”) (Hypericum perforatum L.) in California by the use of introduced insects in the 1940's and 1950's caused increased interest in this approach to weed control. As a result of this increased interest, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) established two overseas laboratories to study arthropod natural enemies of a number of weeds that had been introduced into the United States – in Rome, Italy, in 1959; and near Buenos Aires, Argentina, in 1962. The recent and successful use of an introduced rust pathogen (Puccinia chondrillina Bubak & Syd.) to control rush skeletonweed (Chondrilla juncea L.) in Australia, and the production and utilization of pathogens for control of weeds in the United States, has spurred further interest in biological control.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Andres, L. A. 1981. Biological control of naturalized and native plants: Conflicting interests. Pages 341349 in Papavizas, G. C., ed., Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research, 5: Biological Control in Crop Production. Allanheld, Osmun & Co., Montclair, NJ, and Granada Publ., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
2. Andres, L. A., Davis, C. J., Harris, P., and Wapshere, A. J. 1976. Biological control of weeds. Pages 481499 in Huffaker, C. B. and Messenger, P. S., eds., Theory and Practice of Biological Control, Academic Press, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
3. Andres, L. A. and Kok, L. T. 1981. Status and prospects for biological control of weeds in the U.S.A. Pages 2733 in Coulson, J. R., ed., Proc. Joint American-Soviet Conf. on Use of Beneficial Organisms in the Control of Crop Pests, Entomol. Soc. Am., College Park, MD.Google Scholar
4. Batra, S.W.T. 1981. Biological control of weeds: Principles and prospects. Pages 4549 in Papavizas, G. C., ed., Beltsville Symposia in Agricultural Research, 5: Biological Control in Crop Production. Allanheld, Osmun & Co., Montclair, NJ, and Granada Publ., Ltd., London.Google Scholar
5. Boldt, P. E. and Drea, J.J. 1980. Packaging and shipping beneficial insects for biological control. FAO Plant Prot. Bull. 28:6471.Google Scholar
6. Cavers, P. B. and Mulligan, G. H. 1972. A new series – The biology of Canadian weeds. Can. J. Plant Sci. 52:651654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Charudattan, R. and Walker, H. L., eds. Biological Control of Weeds with Plant Pathogens, John Wiley & Sons, New York. (In press).Google Scholar
8. Freeman, T. E., ed. 1978. Proceedings of the IV International Symposium on Biological Control of Weeds. Center for Environmental Programs, Inst. Food and Agric. Sci., Univ. of Florida, Gainesville. 299 pp.Google Scholar
9. Frick, K. E. 1974. Biological control of weeds: Introduction, history, theoretical and practical applications. Pages 204223 in Maxwell, F. G. and Harris, F. A., eds., Proc. Summer Inst. Biological Control of Plant Insects and Diseases, Univ. Press of Mississippi, Jackson.Google Scholar
10. Goeden, R. D. 1978. Biological control of weeds. Pages 357414 in Clausen, C. P., ed., Introduced Parasites and Predators of Arthropod Pests and Weeds: A World Review. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Handb. 480.Google Scholar
11. Harris, P. 1973. The selection of effective agents for the biological control of weeds. Can. Entomol. 105:14951503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Harris, P. and Zwölfer, H. 1968. Screening of phytophagous insects for biological control of weeds. Can. Entomol. 100:295303.Google Scholar
13. Huffaker, C. B. 1959. Biological control of weeds with insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 4:251276.Google Scholar
14. Huffaker, C. B. 1964. Fundamentals of biological weed control. Pages 631649 in DeBach, P. and Schlinger, E. I., eds., Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Reinhold Publ. Corp., New York.Google Scholar
15. Templeton, G. E., TeBeest, D. O., and Smith, R. J. Jr. 1979. Biological weed control with mycoherbicides. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 17:301310.Google Scholar
16. U.S. Department of Agriculture. 1978. Biological Agents for Pest Control: Status and Prospects. U.S. Govt. Print. Off., Washington, DC. 138 pp.Google Scholar
17. Wapshere, A. J. 1974. Host specificity of phytophagous organisms and the evolutionary centres of plant genera and subgenera. Entomophaga 19:301309.Google Scholar
18. Wilson, C. L. 1969. Use of plant pathogens in weed control. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 7:411434.Google Scholar
19. Zwölfer, H. and Harris, P. 1971. Host specificity determination of insects for biological control of weeds. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 16.159178.Google Scholar