Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-n9wrp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T22:04:33.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth of Hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata) in Hydrosoils of Different Composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Kerry K. Steward
Kerry K. Steward*
Affiliation:
Aquatic Plant Manage. Lab., Agric. Res. Ser., U.S. Dep. Agric., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33314
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hydrilla [Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle ♯ HYLLI] was cultured in flowing water in outside aquaria on rooting media differing in fertility and texture. Nutrient content was determined for rooting media at the beginning of the experiment and for plant tissues at harvest. Growth, as measured by rates of stem elongation, areal coverage of aquaria by plants, and biomass accrual, was highly related to N-, P-, and K-fertility of rooting media. Rooting media were the most important source of phosphorous since water supplies were not adequate to support plant growth. There was evidence of P-deficiencies in plants grown on infertile rooting media. Both N and K were adequately supplied from either water, rooting media, or both. Production of plant biomass was most closely related to P-levels in tissues which were closely related to supplies in rooting media. Pretest soil N (comparable to preestablishment conditions) was best related to biomass production, indicating that growth and establishment of hydrilla may be predictable through assessment of hydrosoil fertility. The need for sampling and analytical procedures to assess fertility is emphasized.

Keywords

Phosphorousnitrogenpotassiumaquatic weedsbiomass
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , May 1984 , pp. 371 - 375
Copyright
Copyright © 1984 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Barko, J. W. 1982. Influence of potassium source (sediment vs. open water) and sediment composition on the growth and nutrition of a submersed fresh water macrophyte [Hydrilla verticillata (L.f.) Royle]. Aquat. Bot. 12:157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Barko, J. W. and Smart, R. M. 1981. Sediment-based nutrition of submersed macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 10:339–352.Google Scholar
3. Barko, J. W. and Smart, R. M. 1980. Mobilization of sediment phosphorus by submersed freshwater macrophytes. Freshwater Biol. 10:229–238.Google Scholar
4. Barr, A. J., Goodnight, J. H., Sall, J. P., Blair, W. H., and Chilko, D. M. 1979. Statistical Analysis System Users' Guide. SAS Inst., Inc., Raleigh, NC. 494 pp.Google Scholar
5. Best, M. D. and Mantal, K. E. 1978. Growth of Myriophyllum: Sediment or lake water as the source of nitrogen and phosphorus. Ecology 59:1075–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Black, C. A. 1965. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Am. Soc. Agron. Madison, WI. 770 pp.Google Scholar
7. Bole, J. B. and Allan, J. R. 1978. Uptake of phosphorus from sediment by aquatic plants Myriophyllum spicatum and Hydrilla verticillata . Water Res. 12(5):353–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bray, J. T., Bricker, O. P., Troup, B. N. 1973. Phosphate in interstitial waters of anoxic sediments: Oxidation effects during sampling procedure. Science 180:1362–1364.Google Scholar
9. Bristow, J. M. and Whitcombe, M. 1971. The role of roots in the nutrition of aquatic vascular plants. Am. J. Bot. 58:8–13.Google Scholar
10. Carignan, R. and Kalff, J. 1980. Phosphorus sources for aquatic weeds, water, or sediments. Science 207:987–989.Google Scholar
11. Den Hartog, C. and Segal, S. 1963. A new classification of the water plant communities. Acta. Bot. Neerl. 13:367–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Gerloff, G. C. 1973. Plant Analysis for Nutrient Assay of Natural Waters. U.S. Environ. Prot. Agency Res. Rep. EPA-R1-73-001 Off. Res. and Monitoring, Washington, DC 20460.Google Scholar
13. Horwitz, W. (Ed.). Official methods of analysis of the association of official agricultural chemists, 10th ed. AOAC. Washington, DC. 957 pp.Google Scholar
14. Hutchinson, G. E. 1957. A treatise on limnology, Vol. 1. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York. 1015 pp.Google Scholar
15. Johnson, C. M. and Ulrich, A. 1959. II. Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 766 pp.Google Scholar
16. King, L. J. 1943. Response of Elodea densa to growth regulating substances. Bot. Gaz. 105:127–151.Google Scholar
17. Mitra, E. 1960. Contributions to our knowledge of Indian fresh water plants. III. Behavior of Hydrilla verticillata Presl. in nature and under experimental conditions. Bull. Bot. Soc. Bengal (India) 14:73–75.Google Scholar
18. Morgan, M. F. 1941. Chemical soil diagnosis by the universal soil-testing system. Conn. State Agric. Exp. Stn. Bull. 450 pp.Google Scholar
19. Steward, K. K. 1972. The phosphorus nutrition of Hydrilla . Q. J. Fla. Acad. Sci. 35:5–6 (Suppl. 1).Google Scholar
20. Sutcliffe, J. F. 1962. Mineral salt absorption in plants. Pergamon Press, London. 194 pp.Google Scholar