Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T08:33:37.281Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of Selected Herbicides for Manipulating Herbaceous Rangeland Vegetation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joseph L. Petersen ,
Robert L. Potter  and
Darrell N. Ueckert
Joseph L. Petersen
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
Robert L. Potter
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
Darrell N. Ueckert
Affiliation:
Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Rt. 2, Box 950, San Angelo, TX 76901
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rosering gaillardia (Gaillardia pulchella Foug. # GAIPU) and other herbaceous broadleaf plants were effectively controlled for one season by sprays of 2,4-D [(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)acetic acid] at 1.1 kg ae/ha or glyphosate [N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine] at 1.1 kg ai/ha, or a 4:1 combination of 2,4-D and picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloropicolinic acid) at 0.7 kg ae/ha applied in late March in the southern Rolling Plains of Texas. Production of perennial warm-season grasses increased 428, 480, 728, and 1440 kg/ha on a clay site 7 months after spraying with 2,4-D, 2,4-D plus picloram (4:1), atrazine [2-chloro-4-(ethylamino)-6-isopropylamino-s-triazine], and glyphosate, respectively. Application of 4.4 kg ae/ha of dalapon (2,2-dichloropropionic acid) severely damaged perennial warm-season grasses. Annual cool-season grasses were effectively controlled with sprays of atrazine or glyphosate at 1.1 kg ai/ha or dalapon at 4.4 kg ae/ha. Texas wintergrass (Stipa leucotricha Trin. & Rupr.) production was greatest on rangeland treated with 2,4-D or 2,4-D plus picloram (4:1).

Keywords

Gaillardia pulchellaStipa leucotricharangelandforge responseannual grassesGAIPU
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 31 , Issue 5 , September 1983 , pp. 735 - 739
Copyright
Copyright © 1983 Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Arnold, W. R. and Santelman, P. W. 1966. The response of native grasses and forbs to picloram. Weeds 14:74–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Baur, J. R., Bovey, R. W., and Holt, E. C. 1977. Effect of herbicides on production and protein levels in pasture grasses. Agron. J. 69:846–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Botts, O. L., Hailey, B., and Mitchell, W. D. 1974. Soil survey of Coleman County, Texas. U.S. Dep. of Agric., Soil. Conser. Serv. 70.Google Scholar
4. Bovey, R. W., Meyer, R. E., and Morton, H. L. 1972. Herbage production following brush control with herbicides in Texas. J. Range Manage. 25:136–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Dwyer, D. D. 1958. Competition between forbs and grasses. J. Range Manage. 11:115–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Gesink, R. W., Alley, H. P., and Lee, G. A. 1973. Vegetative response to chemical control of broom snakeweed on a blue grama range. J. Range Manage. 26:139–143.Google Scholar
7. Hewlett, D. B., Johnson, J. R., Butterfield, R. I., and Mosley, V. K. 1981. Japanese brome response to atrazine in combination with nitrogen fertilizer in the mixed prairie. J. Range Manage. 34:22–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Houston, W. R. 1977. Species susceptibility to atrazine herbicide on shortgrass range. J. Range Manage. 30:50–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Hyder, D. N. 1971. Species susceptibilities to 2,4-D on mixed-grass prairie. Weed Sci. 19:526–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Kay, B. L. 1971. Atrazine and simazine increase yield and quality of range forage. Weed Sci. 19:370–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Klingman, D. L. and McCarty, M. K. 1958. Interrelations of methods of weed control and pasture management at Lincoln, Nebraska, 1949-1955. U.S. Dep. Agric. and Nebraska Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. No. 1180. 49.Google Scholar
12. McCarty, M. K. and Scifres, C. J. 1968. Smooth bromegrass response to herbicides as affected by time of application in relation to nitrogen fertilization. Weed Sci. 16:443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Meyer, R. E., Riley, T. E., Morton, H. L., and Merkle, M. G. 1969. Control of whitebrush and associated species with herbicides in Texas. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn. Misc. Pub. 930. 18.Google Scholar
14. Morrow, L. A., Fenster, C. R., and McCarty, M. K. 1977. Control of downy brome on Nebraska rangeland. J. Range Manage. 30:293–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Smith, A. E. 1982. Chemical control of smutgrass (Sporobolus poiretii). Weed Sci. 30:231–234.Google Scholar
16. Ueckert, D. N. 1979. Broom snakeweed: Effect on shortgrass forage production and soil water depletion. J. Range Manage. 32:216–220.Google Scholar
17. Vanden Born, W. H. 1965. The effect of dicamba and picloram on quackgrass, bromegrass, and Kentucky bluegrass. Weeds. 13:308–312.Google Scholar
18. Waller, S. S. and Schmidt, D. K. 1983. Improvement of eastern Nebraska tallgrass range using atrazine or glyphosate. J. Range Manage. 36:87–90.Google Scholar