Skip to main content Accessibility help

Evaluating the Competitive Ability of Semileafless Field Pea Cultivars

  • Cory E. Jacob (a1), Eric N. Johnson (a1), Miles F. Dyck (a2) and Christian J. Willenborg (a1)


The inclusion of competitive crop cultivars in crop rotations is an important integrated weed management (IWM) tool. However, competitiveness is often not considered a priority for breeding or cultivar selection by growers. Field pea (Pisum sativum L.) is often considered a poor competitor with weeds, but it is not known whether competitiveness varies among semileafless cultivars. The objectives of this study were to determine if semileafless field pea cultivars vary in their ability to compete and/or withstand competition, as well as to identify aboveground trait(s) that may be associated with increased competitive ability. Field experiments were conducted in 2012 and 2013 at three locations in western Canada. Fourteen semileafless field pea cultivars were included in the study representing four different market classes. Cultivars were grown either in the presence or absence of model weeds (wheat and canola), and competitive ability of the cultivars was determined based on their ability to withstand competition (AWC) and their ability to compete (AC). Crop yield, weed biomass and weed fecundity varied among sites but not years. Cultivars exhibited inconsistent differences in competitive ability, although cv. Reward consistently exhibited the lowest AC and AWC. None of the traits measured in this study correlated highly with competitive ability. However, the highest-yielding cultivars generally were those that had the highest AC, whereas cultivars that ranked highest for AWC were associated with lower weed fecundity. Ranking the competitive ability of field pea cultivars could be an important IWM tool for growers and agronomists.


Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail:


Hide All

Associate Editor for this paper: John L. Lindquist, University of Nebraska.



Hide All
Afifi, M, Swanton, CJ (2011) Maize seed and stem roots differ in response to neighbouring weeds. Weed Res 51:442450
Alberta Seed Industry Partnership (2010) Alberta Seed Guide Spring 2010. Accessed May 13, 2015
Andrew, IKS, Storkey, J, Sparkes, DL (2015) A review of the potential for competitive cereal cultivars as a tool in integrated weed management. Weed Res 55:239248
Cousens, RD, Mokhtari, S (1998) Seasonal and site variability in the tolerance of wheat cultivars to interference in Lolium rigidum . Weed Res 38:301307
Darras, S, McKenzie, RH, Olson, MA, Willenborg, CJ (2015) Influence of genotypic mixtures on field pea yield and competitive ability. Can J Plant Sci 95:315324
Dingkuhn, M, Johnson, DE, Sow, S, Audebert, AY (1999) Relationships between upland rice canopy characteristics and weed competitiveness. Field Crops Res 61:7995
Dunbabin, V (2007) Simulating the role of rooting traits in crop–weed competition. Field Crops Res 104:4451
Fox, PN, Cross, J, Romagosa, I (1997) Multi-environment testing and genotype X environment interaction. Pages 112129 in Kempton, RA, Fox, PN, eds. Statistical Methods for Plant Variety Evaluation London Chapman and Hall
Froud-Williams, RK (1997) Varietal selection for weed suppression. Asp Appl Biol 50:344359
Gaudet, CL, Keddy, PA (1988) A comparative approach to predicting competitive ability from plant traits. Nature 334:242243
Goldberg, DE, Landa, K (1991) Competitive effect and response: Hierarchies and correlated traits in the early stages of competition. J Ecol 79: 10131030
Grevsen, K (2003) Weed competitive ability of green peas (Pisum sativum L.) affected by seeding rate and genotype characteristics. Biol Agric Hort 21:247261
Harker, KN (2001) Survey of yield losses due to weeds in central Alberta. Can J Plant Sci 81:339342
Harker, KN, Clayton, GW, Blackshaw, RE (2008) Comparison of leafy and semi-leafless pea for integrated weed management. Weed Technol 22:124131
Jordan, N (1993) Prospect for weed control through crop interference. Ecol Appl 3:8491
Keddy, P, Towlan-Strutt, L, Wisheu, IC (1994) Competitive effect and response rankings in 20 wetland plants: Are they consistent across three environments? J Ecol 82:635643
Lamb, EG, Shore, BH, Cahill, JF (2007) Water and nitrogen addition differentially impact plant competition in a native rough fescue grassland. Plant Ecol 192:2133
Lemerle, D, Verbeek, B, Cousens, RD, Coombes, NE (1996) The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds. Weed Res 36:505513
Lemerle, D, Verbeek, B, Ochard, B (2001) Ranking the ability of wheat varieties to compete with Lolium rigidum . Weed Res 41:197206
Lemerle, D, Verbeek, B, Diffy, S (2006) Influences of field pea (Pisum sativum) density on grain yield and competitiveness with annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) in south-eastern Australia. Aust J Exp Agric 46:14651472
Lindquist, JL, Mortensen, DA (1998) Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci 46:569574
Lindquist, JL, Mortensen, DA, Johnson, BE (1998) Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron J 90:787792
Loomis, RS, Conner, DJ (1992) Crop Ecology: Productivity and Management in Agricultural Systems. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press. 538 p
McDonald, G K (2003) Competitiveness against grass weeds in field pea genotypes. Weed Res 43:4858
Mennan, H, Zandstra, BH (2005) Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and seeding rate on yield loss from Galium aparine (cleavers). Crop Prot 24:10611067
Miller, TE, Werner, PA (1987) Competitive effects and responses between plant species in a first-year old-field community. Ecology 68:12011210
Mohler, CL (2001) Enhancing the competitive ability of crops. Pages 269321 in Liebman, M, Mohler, CL, Staver, CP, eds. Ecological Management of Agricultural Weeds Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press
Pavlychenko, TK, Harrington, JB (1974) Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Can J Res 10:7794
Radosevich, S, Holt, J, Ghersa, C (2007) Plant–plant associations. Pages 183237 in Radosevich, S, Holt, J, Ghersa, C, eds. Ecology of Weeds and Invasive Plants: Relationship to Agriculture and Natural Resource Management Hoboken, NJ John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Rubio, G, Liao, H, Yan, XL, Lynch, JP (2003) Topsoil foraging and its role in plant competitiveness for phosphorus in common bean. Crop Sci 43:598607
SAS Institute (2011) SAS User's Guide. Version 9.3. Cary, NC SAS Institute, 2285 p
Saskatchewan Ministry of Agriculture (2012) Varieties of Grain Crops 2012. Accessed May 13, 2015
Saskatchewan Pulse Growers (2011) Pea production manual. Accessed May 13, 2015
Semere, T, Froud-Williams, RJ (2001) The effect of pea cultivar and water stress on root and shoot competition between vegetative plants of maize and pea. J Appl Ecol 38:137145
Spies, JM, Warkentin, TD, Shirtliffe, SJ (2011) Variation in field pea (Pisum sativum) cultivars for basal branching and weed competition. Weed Sci 59:218223
Tepe, I, Erman, E, Yazlik, A, Levent, R, Ipek, K (2005) Comparison of some winter lentil cultivars in crop–weed protection. Crop Prot 24:585589
Townley-Smith, L, Wright, AT (1994) Field pea cultivar and weed response to crop seed rate in western Canada. Can J Plant Sci 74:387393
Wall, DA, Friesen, GH, Bhati, TK (1991) Wild mustard interference in traditional and semi-leafless field pea. Can J Plant Sci 71:473480
Wang, P, Zhou, DW, Stieglitz, T, Cahill, JF (2010). Are competitive effect and response two sides of the same coin, or fundamentally different? Funct Ecol 24:196207
Watson, PR, Derksen, DA, Van Acker, RC (2006) Ability of 29 barley cultivars to compete and withstand competition. Weed Sci 54:783792
Willenborg, CJ, Rossnagel, BN, Shirtliffe, SJ (2005) Oat caryopsis size and genotype effects on wild oat–oat competition. Crop Sci 45:14101416
Xue, QW, Stougaard, RN (2002) Spring wheat seed size and seedling rate affect wild oat demographics. Weed Sci 50:312320
Zerner, MC, Gill, GS, Vandeleur, RK (2008) Effect of height on the competitive ability of wheat with oats. Agron J 100:17291734


Evaluating the Competitive Ability of Semileafless Field Pea Cultivars

  • Cory E. Jacob (a1), Eric N. Johnson (a1), Miles F. Dyck (a2) and Christian J. Willenborg (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed