Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T16:10:18.098Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Diclofop on Growth, Mitotic Index, and Structure of Wheat (Triticum aestivum) and Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Adventitious Roots

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

I. N. Morrison ,
M. G. Owino  and
E. H. Stobbe
I. N. Morrison
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
M. G. Owino
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
E. H. Stobbe
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant Sci., Univ. of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Methyl ester of diclofop {2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy) phenoxy] propanoic acid} (diclofop as used herein refers to the methyl ester) added to nutrient solution inhibited adventitious root development and reduced the mitotic index in adventitious root tips of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ‘Neepawa’) and wild oat (Avena fatua L.). Elongation of wild oat roots was significantly inhibited by 0.15 μM diclofop 24 h after treatment; whereas, wheat roots were unaffected at concentrations less than 1.5 μM even at 12 days, indicating at least a 10-fold difference in sensitivity. Initiation of new adventitious roots was reduced in both species by 0.30 μM diclofop. Mitotic index was more severely reduced at lower concentrations and after a shorter exposure in wild oat than in wheat. Histological studies showed that 24 h after wild oat roots were treated with 0.30 μM diclofop for 24 h, severe damage occurred to tissues within the developing central cylinder, close to the root apex. Disruption of cortical and epidermal cells generally was not as severe until 4 to 7 days after treatment. By 12 days the entire root tip was almost completely obliterated, with only the epidermal cell walls remaining intact.

Keywords

Mode of actionselectivityanatomy
Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , July 1981 , pp. 426 - 432
Copyright
Copyright © 1981 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Ashton, F. M., Cutter, E. G., and Huffstutter, D. 1969. Growth and structural modifications of oats induced by bromacil. Weed Res. 9:198–204.Google Scholar
2. Bartels, P. G. and Hilton, J. L. 1973. Comparison of trifluralin, oryzalin, pronamide, propham, and colchicine treatments on microtubules. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 3:468–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Brezeanu, A. G., Davis, D. G., and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1976. Ultrastructural effects and translocation of methyl-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoate in wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oat (Avena fatua . Can. J. Bot. 54:2038–2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Cartwright, P. M. 1976. General growth responses of plants. Pages 55–82 in Audus, L. J., ed. Herbicides Physiology, Biochemistry, Ecology. 2nd ed. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
5. Chow, P. N. P. and LaBerge, D. E. 1978. Wild oat herbicide studies. 2. Physiological and chemical changes in barley and wild oats treated with diclofop-methyl herbicide in relation to plant tolerance. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:1134–1137.Google Scholar
6. Crowley, J., O'Donovan, J. T., and Prendeville, G. N. 1978. Phytotoxicity of soil applied dichlofop methyl and its effects on uptake of 45Ca in wild oats, barley and wheat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 58:395–399.Google Scholar
7. Cutter, E. G., Ashton, F. M., and Huffstutter, D. 1968. The effects of bensulide on the growth, morphology and anatomy of oat roots. Weed Res. 8:346–352.Google Scholar
8. Hess, D. and Bayer, D. 1974. The effect of trifluralin on the ultrastructure of dividing cells of the root meristem of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Acala 4-42’). J. Cell Sci. 15:429–441.Google Scholar
9. Hoerauf, R. A. and Shimabukuro, R. H. 1979. The response of resistant and susceptible plants to diclofop-methyl. Weed Res. 19:293–299.Google Scholar
10. Jensen, W. A. 1962. Botanical Histochemistry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco. 408 pp.Google Scholar
11. Martens, R. 1978. Degradation of the herbicide (14C)-dichlofop-methyl in soils under different conditions. Pestic. Sci. 9:127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Rost, T. L. and Bayer, D. E. 1976. Cell cycle population kinetics of pea root tip meristems treated with propham. Weed Sci. 24: 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Shimabukuro, M. A., Shimabukuro, R. H., Nord, W. S., and Hoerauf, R. A. 1978. Physiological effects of methyl 2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy] propanoate in oat, wild oat and wheat. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 8:199–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Shimabukuro, R. H., Walsh, W. C., and Hoerauf, R. A. 1979. Metabolism and selectivity of diclofop-methyl in wild oat and wheat. J. Agric. Food Chem. 27:615–623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Spurr, A. R. 1969. A low-viscosity epoxy resin embedding medium for electron microscopy. J. Ultrastructure Res. 26:31–43.Google Scholar
16. Steele, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, New York. 481 pp.Google Scholar
17. Todd, B. G. and Stobbe, E. H. 1977. Selectivity of diclofop methyl among wheat, barley, wild oat (Avena fatua) and green foxtail (Setaria viridis . Weed Sci. 25:382–385.Google Scholar