Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-22T04:06:08.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of DCPA on Tomato Hypocotyl Tissue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

J. LaMar Anderson  and
Bijan Shaybany
J. LaMar Anderson
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Sci., Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah 84321
Bijan Shaybany
Affiliation:
Dep. of Plant Sci., Utah State Univ., Logan, Utah 84321
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Dimethyl tetrachloroterephthalate (DCPA) caused localized swelling of the hypocotyl of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. ‘VF-99′). DCPA caused phloem and xylem parenchyma cells to become multinucleate and to develop into masses undifferentiated tissue within the stele of the tomato hypocotyl. Xylem procambium differentiated earlier than that of controls and matured into shortened and often disconnected elements. Xylem formed prior to treatment was often disrupted due to pressure from the dividing xylem parenchyma. Xylem parenchyma tended to break down resulting in the formation of air cavities within the stele. Cells in the stele of treated hypocotyls tended to stain more intensely with safranin than did the cells in the steles of untreated tomato hypocotyls indicating a difference in cell wall composition. Treated tissue had a higher concentration of total oxalates than did untreated tissue.

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Science , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , September 1972 , pp. 434 - 439
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Bingham, S. W. 1968. Effect of DCPA on anatomy and cytology of roots. Weed Sci. 16:449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Chang, Chen-hong and Smith, D. W. 1970. The effect of DCPA on mitosis of millet seedlings. Proc. S. Weed Conf. 23:321.Google Scholar
3. Crafts, A. S. and Yamaguchi, S. 1964. The autoradiography of plant materials. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. and Ext. Serv. Manual 35: 143 p.Google Scholar
4. D'Amato, F. 1948. Sull'attivitá colchicino-mitotica e su altri effetti citologici del 2,4-diclorofenossiacetato di sodio. Rend. Accad. Naz. Lincei, Cl. Sc. Fis. Ser 8a 4:570–578.Google Scholar
5. D'Amato, F. 1952. Polyploidy in the differentiation and function of tissues and cells in plants. Caryologia 4:311–358.Google Scholar
6. Dye, W. B. 1956. Chemical studies on Halogeton glomeratus . Weeds 4:55–60.Google Scholar
7. Fuchs, C. 1963. Fuchsin staining with NaOH clearing for lignified elements of whole plants or plant organs. Stain Technol. 38:141–144.Google Scholar
8. Jensen, W. A. 1962. Botanical histochemistry. W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco. 408 p.Google Scholar
9. Lebaron, H. M. 1963. Studies with Dacthal for weed control in transplanted tomatoes. Proc. Northeast. Weed Contr. Conf. 17:110–115.Google Scholar
10. Nishimoto, R. K. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Site of uptake, movement, and activity of DCPA. Weed Sci. 19:152–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Nishimoto, R. K. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Stem abnormality induced by DCPA. Weed Sci. 19:343–346.Google Scholar
12. Osgood, R. V. and Romanowski, R. R. 1967. The phytotoxicity, site of uptake and translocation of DCPA in resistant and susceptible cotyledon-stage weed species. Proc. Asian-Pacific Weed Contr. Interchange 1:123–126.Google Scholar
13. Partanen, C. R. 1959. Quantitative chromosomal changes and differentiation in plants, p. 21–35. In Rudnick, D. [ed]. Developmental cytology. Ronald Press, New York.Google Scholar
14. Shaybany, B. and Anderson, J. L. 1972. Effects of chlorthal dimethyl on oat seedling anatomy. Weed Res. 12:164–168.Google Scholar
15. Van Fleet, D. S. 1961. Histochemistry and function of the endodermis. Bot. Rev. 27:165–220.Google Scholar
16. Venning, F. D. 1949. Investigations of the morphology, anatomy, and secondary growth in the main axis of Marglobe tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.). Amer. J. Bot. 36:559–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar