Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T11:22:32.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Adjuvants on Behavior of Metribuzin in Soil and Soybean Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Joe E. Street ,
Glenn Wehtje ,
Robert H. Walker  and
Michael G. Patterson
Joe E. Street
Affiliation:
Miss. Agric. and For. Exp. Stn., Delta Branch, Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776
Glenn Wehtje
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Robert H. Walker
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Michael G. Patterson
Affiliation:
Dep. Agron. and Soils, Alabama Agric. Exp. Stn., Auburn Univ., AL 36849
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Three adjuvants, ARD 54, ARD 93, and ARD 1836, were evaluated for their ability to reduce metribuzin [4-amino-6-(1,1-dimethylethyl)-3-(methylthio)-1,2,4-triazin-5(4H)-one] phytotoxicity to soybeans [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in sandy soils. A reduction in metribuzin phytotoxicity was observed, usually without reductions in sicklepod (Cassia obtusifolia L. # CASOB) control. The addition of linseed oil to a spray suspension containing 1% ARD 1836 reduced sicklepod control slightly at one of two locations. The addition of these adjuvants and linseed oil to the spray solution had no effect on soybean yield. These adjuvants slightly reduced movement of metribuzin in thin-layer soil chromatography but had no influence on sorption in batch-equilibrium experiments.

Keywords

CASOBherbicide soil behaviorlinseed oilARD 54ARD 93ARD 1863
Type
Soil, Air, and Water
Information
Weed Science , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , May 1987 , pp. 422 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © 1987 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Adams, F., Burmester, C., Hue, N. V., and Long, L. F. 1980. A comparison of column displacement and centrifuge methods for obtaining soil solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 44:733–735.Google Scholar
2. Barrentine, W. L., Edwards, C. J. Jr., and Hartwig, E. E. 1976. Screening soybeans for tolerance to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:351–353.Google Scholar
3. Bayer, D. E. 1967. Effect of surfactants on leaching of substituted urea herbicides in soil. Weeds 15:249–252.Google Scholar
4. Coble, H. D. and Schrader, J. W. 1973. Soybean tolerance to metribuzin. Weed Sci. 21:308–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Davis, F. L. and Selman, F. L. 1954. Effects of water upon the movement of dinitro weed killers in soils. Weeds 3:11–20.Google Scholar
6. Goetz, A. J., Wehtje, G., Walker, R. H., and Hajek, B. 1986. Soil solution and leachability of imazaquin in Alabama soils. Weed Sci. 34:788–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Helling, C. S. 1971. Pesticide mobility in soils I. Parameters of thin-layer chromatography. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36:732–737.Google Scholar
8. Jansen, L. L., Gentner, W. A., and Shaw, W. C. 1961. Effects of surfactants on the herbicidal activity of several herbicides in aqueous spray systems. Weeds 9:381–405.Google Scholar
9. Ladlie, J. S., Meggitt, W. F., and Penner, D. 1976. Effect of soil pH on microbial degradation, adsorption and mobility of metribuzin. Weed Sci. 24:477–481.Google Scholar
10. Moomaw, R. S. and Martin, A. R. 1978. Interaction of metribuzin and trifluralin with soil type on soybean (Glycine max) growth. Weed Sci. 26:327–331.Google Scholar
11. Parochetti, J. V., Wilson, H. P., and Beste, C. E. 1977. Effects of several adjuvants on preemergence and postemergence herbicides in 1976. Proc. Northeast. Weed Sci. Soc. 31:105–112.Google Scholar
12. Savage, K. E. and Barrentine, W. L. 1976. Metribuzin mobility and persistence as affected by a spray adjuvant. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 29:503.Google Scholar
13. Walker, R. H., Street, J. E., and Jolley, E. R. 1979. Influence of additives on metribuzin phytotoxicity – A preliminary report. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 32:314.Google Scholar
14. Wax, L. M., Stoller, E. W., and Bernard, R. L. 1976. Differential response of soybean cultivars to metribuzin. Agron. J. 68:484–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar