Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Effect of tillage, fungicide seed treatment, and soil fumigation on seed bank dynamics of wild oat (Avena fatua)

  • Eric R. Gallandt, E. Patrick Fuerst (a1) and Ann C. Kennedy (a2)

Abstract

No-tillage offers potential for improved soil quality, reduced erosion, and equal or increased crop yields. We hypothesized that, compared with conservation tillage (CT), no-tillage (NT) offers conditions more conducive to microbial decay of weed seed. In NT systems seed remain at or near the soil surface where crop residues, moisture, and lack of disturbance create an environment with greater soil microbial diversity. In late fall of 1998 and 1999, dormant seed of wild oat, either individually glued to plastic toothpicks or mixed with soil and placed in mesh bags, were buried (mean seed depth of 2.5 cm) in replicated field plots managed by NT or CT since 1982. Treatments including fungicide seed treatment (thiram + metalaxyl + captan) and soil fumigation (propylene oxide) provided estimates of the contribution of microorganisms to observed mortality. Seed were retrieved in May and August, 1999 and 2000. Contrary to our original hypothesis, the proportion of dead seed was generally similar in NT and CT systems. Lack of tillage system by seed or soil treatments affecting the proportion of dead or decayed seed suggests that the contribution of microorganisms to seed fate is similar in these tillage environments. However, the proportion of dormant seed was consistently lower in the NT compared with CT treatments; there was a corresponding increase in the proportion of germinated seed. Overall, more than half of the wild oat seed bank losses could be directly attributed to germination whereas losses due to decay were relatively minor by comparison. Despite favorable distribution of seed and improved quality of the surface-strata of soil in NT systems, this study fails to provide evidence that enhanced microbial decay will contribute to a “weed-suppressive” capacity in such cropping systems.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental Sciences, University of Maine, 5722 Deering Hall, Orono, ME 04469-5722; gallandt@maine.edu

References

Hide All
Allen, P. S., Meyer, S. E., and Khan, M. A. 2000. Hydrothermal time as a tool in comparative germination studies. Pages 401410 in Black, M., Bradford, K. J., and Vazquez-Ramos, J. eds. Seed Biology: Advances and Applications. Oxfordshire, UK: CABI.
Boyle, M., Frankenberger, J. W. T., and Stolzy, L. H. 1989. The influence of organic matter on soil aggregation and water infiltration. J. Prod. Agric 2:290299.
Burnside, O. C., Wicks, G. A., and Fenster, C. R. 1977. Longevity of shattercane seed in soil across Nebraska. Weed Res 17:139143.
Cavers, P. B. and Benoit, D. L. 1989. Seed banks in arable land. Pages 309328 in Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T., and Simpson, R. L. eds. Ecology of Soil Seed Banks. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Cook, R. E. 1980. The biology of seeds in soil. Pages 107129 in Solbrig, O. T. ed. Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Cook, R. J. 1982. Use of pathogen-suppressive soils for disease control. Pages 5165 in Schneider, R. W. ed. Soils and Plant Disease. St. Paul, MN: The American Pathological Society.
Donald, W. W. 1993. Models and sampling for studying weed seed survival with wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis) as a case study. Can. J. Plant Sci 73:637645.
Egley, G. H. and Duke, S. O. 1985. Physiology of weed seed dormancy and germination. Pages 2764 in Duke, S. O. ed. Weed Physiology, Volume 1, Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Fellows, G. M. and Roeth, F. W. 1992. Factors influencing shattercane (Sorghum bicolor) seed survival. Weed Sci 40:434440.
Fenner, M. 1985. Seed Ecology. New York: Chapman and Hall. Pp. 7286.
Foley, M. E. 1994. Temperature and water status affecting afterripening in wild oat (Avena fatua). Weed Sci 42:200204.
Forcella, F., Buhler, D. D., and McGiffin, M. E. 1994. Pest management and crop residues. Pages 173189 in Hatfield, J. L. and Stewart, B. A. eds. Crops Residue Management. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
Gallagher, R. S. and Fuerst, E. P. 2004. The ecophysiology of seed longevity. in Basra, A. S., ed. Handbook of Seed Science. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Food Products Press. In press.
Gallandt, E. R., Liebman, M., and Huggins, D. R. 1999. Improving soil quality: implications for weed management. J. Crop Prod 2:95121.
Harman, G. E. and Stasz, T. E. 1986. Influence of seed quality on soil microbes and seed rots. Pages 1137 in West, S. H. ed. Physiological-Pathological Interactions Affecting Seed Deterioration. Madison, WI: Crop Science Society of America.
Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. The World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. Honolulu, HI: The University Press of Hawaii. P. 105.
JMP. 2002. JMP® Statistics and Graphics Guide. Version 5. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
Johnson, M. D. and Lowery, B. 1985. Effect of three conservation tillage practices on soil temperature and thermal properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 49:15471552.
Kennedy, A. C. 1999. Soil microorganisms for weed management. J. Prod. Agric 2:123138.
Kennedy, A. C., Elliott, L. F., Young, F. L., and Douglas, C. L. 1991. Rhizobacteria suppressive to the weed downy brome. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 55:722727.
Kiewnick, L. 1964. Experiments on the influence of seedborne and soilborne microflora on the viability of wild oat seeds (Avena fatua L.) II. Experiments on the influence of microflora on the viability of seeds in the soil. Weed Res 4:3143.
Kladivko, E. J. 2001. Tillage systems and soil ecology. Soil Tillage Res 61:6176.
Kremer, R. J. 1993. Management of weed seed banks with microorganisms. Ecol. Appl 3:4252.
Kremer, R. J. and Spencer, N. R. 1989. Interaction of insects, fungi, and burial on velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) seed viability. Weed Technol 3:322328.
Leishman, M. R., Masters, G. J., Clarke, I. P., and Brown, V. K. 2000. Seed bank dynamics: the role of fungal pathogens and climate change. Funct. Ecol 14:293299.
Lonsdale, W. M. 1993. Losses from the seed bank of Mimosa pigra: soil micro-organisms vs. temperature fluctuations. J. Appl. Ecol 30:654660.
Lupwayi, N. W., Rice, W. A., and Clayton, G. W. 1998. Soil microbial diversity and community structure under wheat as influenced by tillage and crop rotation. Soil Biol. Biochem 30:17331741.
Mortensen, K. and Hsiao, A. I. 1987. Fungal infestation of seeds from seven populations of wild oats (Avena fatua L.) with different dormancy and viability characteristics. Weed Res 27:297304.
Naylor, J. M. and Fedec, P. 1978. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua. 8. Genetic diversity affecting response to temperature. Can. J. Bot 56:22242229.
Ogg, A. G. and Dawson, J. H. 1984. Time of emergence of eight weed species. Weed Sci 32:327335.
Papendick, R. I. and Parr, J. F. 1997. No-till farming: the way of the future for a sustainable dryland agriculture. Ann. Arid Zone 36:193208.
Petersen, S. O., Frohne, P. S., and Kennedy, A. C. 2002. Dynamics of a soil microbial community under spring wheat. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 66:826833.
Pitty, A., Staniforth, D. W., and Tiffany, L. H. 1987. Fungi associated with caryopses of Setaria species from field-harvested seeds and from soil under two tillage systems. Weed Sci 35:319323.
Ramakrishna, N., Lacey, J., and Smith, J. E. 1991. Effect of surface sterilization, fumigation and gamma irradiation on the microflora and germination of barley seeds. Int. J. Food Microbiol 13:4754.
Reece, C. F. 1996. Evaluation of a line heat dissipation sensor for measuring soil matric potential. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J 60:10221028.
[SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 1988. SAS/STAT®, User's Guide, Release 6.03. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute.
Sawhney, R. and Naylor, J. M. 1982. Dormancy studies in seed of Avena fatua 13. Influence of drought stress during seed development on the duration of seed dormancy. Can. J. Bot 60:10161020.
Simpson, G. M. 1990. Seed Dormancy in Grasses. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 60194.
Skipper, H. D. and Westermann, D. T. 1973. Comparative effects of propylene oxide, sodium azide, and autoclaving on selected soil properties. Soil Biol. Biochem 5:409414.
Smith, J. L. and Doran, J. W. 1996. Measurement and use of pH and electrical conductivity for soil quality analysis. Pages 169185 in Doran, J. W. and Jones, A. J. eds. Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
Smith, T. E. 1947. Gaseous sterilization of biological materials for use as culture media. Phytopathology 37:369371.
Tabatabai, M. A. 1994. Soil enzymes. in Weaver, R. W., Angle, S., Bottomley, P., Bezdicek, D., Smith, S., Tabatabai, A., and Wollum, A., eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II: Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Madison, WI: Soil Science Society of America.
Uri, N. D. 1999. Conservation Tillage in U.S. Agriculture—Environmental, Economic, and Policy Issues. New York: Food Products Press, Haworth.
Wollum, A. G. II. 1982. Cultural methods for soil microorganisms. Pages 781802 in Page, A. L., Miller, R. H., and Keeney, D. R. eds. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy.
Yenish, J. P., Doll, J. D., and Buhler, D. D. 1992. Effects of tillage on vertical distribution and viability of weed seed in soil. Weed Sci 40:429433.
Zorner, P. S., Zimdahl, R. L., and Schweizer, E. E. 1984. Sources of viable seed loss in buried dormant and non-dormant populations of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) seed in Colorado. Weed Res 24:143150.

Keywords

Effect of tillage, fungicide seed treatment, and soil fumigation on seed bank dynamics of wild oat (Avena fatua)

  • Eric R. Gallandt, E. Patrick Fuerst (a1) and Ann C. Kennedy (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed