Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:35:18.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of establishment date and crop competition on burcucumber fecundity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Wade R. Esbenshade
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Gregory W. Roth
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Nathan L. Hartwig
Affiliation:
Department of Agronomy, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Michael D. Orzolek
Affiliation:
Department of Horticulture, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

Abstract

An experiment examining the effect of burcucumber emergence date and corn competition on burcucumber fecundity was conducted in 1997 and 1998 in central Pennsylvania. Burcucumber seedlings were transplanted in the field in approximately 10-d intervals starting in late May through mid-August with or without competition from corn. Burcucumber plants grown without competition from corn produced 716 g dry matter and 4,500 seeds plant−1 in 1997 and 607 g dry matter and 1,800 seeds plant−1 in 1998. Biomass was greatest for plants established in late May, whereas seed production was greatest for plants established in mid-June. Although seed numbers were reduced in comparison to the May and June establishment periods, plants established as late as August still produced seed. Burcucumber established in corn produced 96% less dry matter and seed than the plants in a noncompetitive environment in both years of the study. Although the growth and seed production of burcucumber grown in corn was drastically reduced, plants established in mid-July still produced seed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Blackshaw, R. E. and Harker, K. N. 1998. Redstem filaree (Erodium cicutarium) development and productivity under noncompetitive conditions. Weed Technol. 12:590594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cardina, J., Regnier, E., and Sparrow, D. 1995. Velvetleaf competition and economic thresholds in conventional- and no-tillage corn. Weed Sci. 43:8187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curran, W. S., Dyer, W. E., and Maxwell, B. D. 2000. Examination of burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus) seed germination and dormancy. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 40:2627.Google Scholar
Deen, W., Hunt, T., and Swanton, C. J. 1998. Influence of temperature, photoperiod, and irradiance on the phenological development of common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia). Weed Sci. 46:555560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forcella, F., Wilson, R. G., Renner, K. A., Dekker, J. D., Harvey, R. G., Alm, D. A., Buhler, D. D., and Cardina, J. 1992. Weed seedbanks of the U.S. corn belt: magnitude, variation, emergence, and application. Weed Sci. 40:636644.Google Scholar
Knezevic, S. Z. and Horak, M. J. 1998. Influence of emergence time and density on redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 46:665672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, R. K., Rieck, C. E., and Witt, W. W. 1981. Germination and emergence of burcucumber (Sicyos angulatus). Weed Sci. 29:8386.Google Scholar
McLachlan, S. M., Tollenaar, M., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. Effect of corn-induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and architecture of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci. 41:568573.Google Scholar
Patterson, D. T. 1995. Effects of photoperiod on reproductive development in velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti). Weed Sci. 43:637–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, M. A. and Williams, J. L. 1966. Control of burcucumber in field corn. Proc. North Cent. Weed Control Conf. 21:10.Google Scholar
Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Analysis of variance II: multiway classifications. In Principles and Procedures of Statistics: Biometrical Approach. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 195236.Google Scholar
Teasdale, J. R. 1998. Influence of corn (Zea mays) population and row spacing on corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) yield. Weed Sci. 46:447453.Google Scholar