Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T01:17:38.288Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differences in the Phytotoxic Response of Wild Oats (Avena fatua) to Triallate and Trifluralin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

D. Billett
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W0, Canada
R. Ashford
Affiliation:
Crop Sci. Dep., Univ. Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 0W0, Canada

Abstract

Several differences between the mode of action of trifluralin (α,α,α-trifluoro-2,6-dinitro-N,N-dipropyl-p-toluidine) and triallate [S-(2,3,3-trichloroallyl)diisopropylthiocarbamate] were observed on wild oats (Avena fatua L.) in growth chamber experiments. Trifluralin exhibited little or no postemergence effect when applied to the soil surface. Surface applications of triallate interfered with deposition of epicuticular wax on leaf surfaces, and caused necrotic lesions, leaf break, and the abortion of the first leaf through the coleoptile. Trifuralin, but not triallate, incorporated in the soil reduced extension of the wild oat coleoptile. Soil-incorporated treatments involving trifluralin induced more extensive swelling of the mesocotyl, coleoptile node, and and coleoptile than triallate applied similarly. Triallate appeared to exert its major effect on cell elongation of the wild oat foliar material enclosed in the coleoptile. Trifluralin caused its greatest phytotoxic effect on the meristematic tissue at the region of the coleoptile node.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1978 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

1. Appleby, A. P., Furtick, W. R., and Fang, S. C. 1965. Soil placement studies with EPTC and other carbamate herbicides on Avena sativa . Weed Res. 5:115122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Ashford, R. 1975. Triallate granule spacing effect on oat. Weed Sci. 23:470472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Ashford, R. and Holroyd, J. 1976. Phytotoxicity of two different patterns of triallate granules to emerged wild oat (Avena fatua) and wheat plants. Br. Crop Prot. Counc. Monogr. No. 18:6771.Google Scholar
4. Banting, J. D. 1970. Effect of diallate and triallate on wild oat and wheat cells. Weed Sci. 18:8084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Barrentine, W. L. and Warren, G. F. 1971. Shoot zone activity of trifluralin and nitralin. Weed Sci. 19:3741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Bayer, D. E., Foy, C. L., Mallory, T. E., and Cutter, E. G. 1967. Morphological and histological effects of trifluralin on root development. Amer. J. Bot. 54:945952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Begg, J. E. and Wright, M. J. 1962. Growth and development of leaves from intercalary meristem in Phalaris arundinacea L. Nature 194:10971098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Holroyd, J. 1968. Triallate granules for the postemergence control of Avena fatua in winter and spring cereals. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 9:6873.Google Scholar
9. Knake, E. L. and Wax, L. M. 1968. The importance of the shoot of giant foxtail for uptake of preemergence herbicides. Weed Sci. 16:393395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Parker, C. 1962. Factors affecting the performance of diallate and triallate in the control of Avena spp. in cereals. Proc. Brit. Weed Control Conf. 6:321323.Google Scholar
11. Rahman, A. and Ashford, R. 1970. Selective action of trifluralin for control of green foxtail in wheat. Weed Sci. 18:754759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Still, G. G., Davis, D. G., and Zander, G. L. 1970. Plant epicuticular lipids: alteration by herbicidal carbamates. Plant Physiol. 46:307314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Swann, C. W. and Behrens, R. 1972. Phytotoxicity of trifluralin vapors from soil. Weed Sci. 20:143146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar