Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Corn leaf architecture as a tool for weed management in two corn production systems

  • Sujatha Sankula (a1), Mark J. VanGessel and Ronald R. Mulford (a2)

Abstract

Research in irrigated and nonirrigated corn production systems was conducted to evaluate the effect of leaf architecture of corn hybrids on weed management. The corn hybrids used in each study were ‘Pioneer 3394’ (upright leaf) and ‘Pioneer 3260’ (horizontal leaf). In the irrigated study, residual weed control treatments included two rates of prepackaged mixtures of metolachlor plus atrazine, encapsulated acetochlor plus atrazine, nonencapsulated acetochlor plus atrazine, or a tank mixture of simazine and metolachlor plus atrazine. In the irrigated experiments, horizontal leaf architecture reduced weed density (all three sites in 1 of 2 yr), weed biomass (five of six sites), solar radiation reaching the ground (all six sites), and weed seed production (one site each year) compared with upright leaf architecture. Weed density and weed biomass did not differ between herbicide rates or acetochlor formulation at any site. Corn hybrid was significant for yield at only one site. Reduced weed biomass did not translate into yield differences. The nonirrigated study evaluated two factors at four sites over 2 yr: leaf architecture (upright or horizontal leaf) and weed management program (preemergence residual and postemergence no residual) at two application rates. Neither weed density nor weed biomass was reduced because of corn leaf architecture or herbicide rates in the nonirrigated study. No interaction was detected in either irrigated or nonirrigated studies between leaf architecture and herbicide treatments, indicating that these factors are independent of one another. On the basis of these studies, it appears that horizontal leaf architecture of corn hybrids can assist in integrated weed management in irrigated corn production but may not be beneficial when corn is grown under drought-prone conditions.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author. Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware Research and Education Center, Georgetown, DE 19973; mjv@udel.edu

References

Hide All
Ball, D. A. and Shaffer, M. J. 1993. Simulating resource competition in multispecies agriculture plant communities. Weed Res 33:299310.
Begna, S. H., Hamilton, R. I., Dwyer, L. M., Stewart, D. W., Cloutier, D., Assemat, L., Foroutan-Pour, K., and Smith, D. L. 2001. Weed biomass production response to plant spacing and corn (Zea mays) hybrids differing in canopy architecture. Weed Technol 15:647653.
Benvenuti, S., Macchia, M., and Stefani, A. 1994. Effects of shade on reproduction and some morphological characteristics of Abutilon theophrasti Medicus., Datura stramonium L., and Sorghum halapense (L.) Pers. Weed Res 34:283288.
Bosnic, A. C. and Swanton, C. J. 1997. Influence of barnyardgrass (Echinocloa crus-galli) time of emergence and density on corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 45:276282.
Boyd, J. W. and Murray, D. S. 1982. Effects of shade on silverleaf nightshade (Solanum elaeagnifolium). Weed Sci 30:264269.
Carey, V. F., Smith, R. J., and Talbert, R. E. 1994. Interference duration of bearded sprangletop (Leptochloa fascicularis) in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 42:180183.
Chandler, J. M. and Meredith, W. R. Jr. 1983. Yields of three cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) cultivars as influenced by spurred anoda (Anoda cristata) competition. Weed Sci 31:303307.
Forcella, F., Patterson, D. H., and Barbour, J. C. 1996. Timing and measurement of weed seed shed in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol 10:535543.
Johnson, M. D., Wyse, D. L., and Lueschen, W. E. 1989. The influence of herbicide formulation on weed control in four tillage systems. Weed Sci 37:239249.
Knake, E. L. 1972. Effect of shade on giant foxtail. Weed Sci 20:588592.
Knezevic, S. Z., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1994. Interference of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci 42:568573.
Kropff, M. J., Spitters, C. J. T., Schnieders, B. J., Joenje, W., and De Groot, W. 1992. An eco-physiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugar beet. II. Model evaluation. Weed Res 32:451463.
Lindquist, J. L. and Mortensen, D. A. 1998. Tolerance and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) suppressive ability of two old and two modern corn (Zea mays) hybrids. Weed Sci 46:569574.
Lindquist, J. L., Mortensen, D. A., and Johnson, B. E. 1998. Mechanisms of corn tolerance and velvetleaf suppressive ability. Agron. J 90:787792.
McLachlan, S. M., Tollenaar, M., Swanton, C. J., and Weise, S. F. 1993. Effect of corn induced shading on dry matter accumulation, distribution, and orientation of redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Weed Sci 41:568573.
Mickelson, J. A. and Harvey, R. G. 1999. Relating Eriochloa villosa emergence to interference in Zea mays . Weed Sci 47:571577.
Murphy, S. D., Yakubu, Y., Weise, S. F., and Swanton, C. J. 1996. Effect of planting patterns and inter-row cultivation on competition between corn and late emerging weeds. Weed Sci 44:856870.
Newcomer, D. T., Giraudo, L. J., and Banks, P. A. 1986. Soybean (Glycine max) Cultivar as a Factor of Weed Control in No-till Double-cropped Production Following Wheat. Athens, GA: Georgia Agricultural Experiment Station Research Report 508. 16 p.
Patterson, D. T. 1982. Effects of shading and temperature on showy crotalaria (Crotalaria spectablis). Weed Sci 30:692697.
Patterson, D. T. 1985. Comparative ecophysiology of weeds and crops. Pages 101129 in Duke, S. O. ed. Weed Physiology. Volume I: Reproduction and Ecophysiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC.
Ramsel, R. E. and Wicks, G. A. 1988. Control of weeds with corn hybrids, planting dates, and irrigation scheduling. Proceedings of the North Central Weed Control conference. 61 p.
Rose, S. J., Burnside, O. C., Specht, J. E., and Swisher, B. A. 1984. Competition and allelopathy between soybean and weeds. Agron. J 76:523528.
Schreiber, M. M., Srasha, B. S., Trimmell, D., and White, M. D. 1988. Controlled release herbicides. Pages 177191 in McWhorter, C. G. and Gebhardt, M. R. eds. Methods of Applying Herbicides. WSSA Monograph 4. Champaign, IL: WSSA.
Sims, J. T., Mackenzie, J. A., Tilmon, H. D., Taylor, R. W., Williams, T. H., Hawk, J. A., Uniatowski, R., Graustein, M. R., and Webb, F. J. 1987. Irrigated Corn Production: A Guide to Profitable High Yields. Newark, DE: University of Delaware Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension, Cooperative Bulletin 13.
Staniforth, D. W. 1961. Responses of corn hybrids to yellow foxtail competition. Weeds 9:132136.
Sweet, R. D., Yip, C. P., and Sieczka, B. 1974. Crop varieties: can they suppress weeds? NY Food Life Sci. Q 7:35.
Teasdale, J. R. 1998. Influence of corn (Zea mays) population and row spacing on corn and velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) yield. Weed Sci 46:447453.
Toler, J. E., Murdock, E. C., Stapleton, G. S., and Wallace, S. U. 1999. Corn leaf orientation effects on light interception, intraspecific competition, and grain yields. J. Prod. Agric 12:396399.
VanGessel, M. J. and Renner, K. A. 1990. Redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus) and barnyardgrass (Echinocloa crus-galli) interference in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Weed Sci 38:338343.
Vencill, W. K. ed. 2002. Herbicide Handbook. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pp. 13, 299, 300.
Walker, G. K., Blackshaw, R. E., and Dekker, J. 1988. Leaf area and competition for light between plant species using direct sunlight transmission. Weed Technol 2:159165.

Keywords

Corn leaf architecture as a tool for weed management in two corn production systems

  • Sujatha Sankula (a1), Mark J. VanGessel and Ronald R. Mulford (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed