Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-fnpn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-30T10:46:13.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Competition of noogoora burr (Xanthium occidentale) and fierce thornapple (Datura ferox) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

Graham W. Charles ,
Robert D. Murison  and
Steven Harden
Robert D. Murison
Affiliation:
School of Mathematics and Computing Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia
Steven Harden
Affiliation:
NSW Agriculture, Tamworrh Center for Crop Improvement, Tamworth, NSW 2340, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Competitiveness of noogoora burr and fierce thornapple in irrigated cotton was assessed using area-of-influence methodology. Lint yields were regressed against distances from the weeds using spline regression. The resulting regression curves were used to estimate areas of influence and yield losses, which were further modeled as functions of weed size to understand weed competitiveness. Cotton lint yield reductions averaged 36 and 12%, with maximum distances of influence of 1.71 and 1.65 m for noogoora burr and fierce thornapple, respectively. Economic thresholds for control using hand hoeing were related to weed size. Thresholds for average-size weeds were one cocklebur in 195 m and one fierce thornapple in 73 m of cotton row.

Keywords

Noogoora burr (Australian common name)Xanthium occidentale Bertol. XANSIfierce thornapple, Datura ferox L.cotton, Gossypium hirsutum L. ‘Siokra 1–4.'Area of influencedistance of influencecompetitionyield lossspline regressionXANSI
Type
Weed Biology and Ecology
Information
Weed Science , Volume 46 , Issue 4 , August 1998 , pp. 442 - 446
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Buchanan, G. A. and Burns, E. R. 1971. Weed competition in cotton. II. Cocklebur and redroot pigweed. Weed Sci. 19: 580–582.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. D. and Coble, H. D. 1991a. Interference of selected weeds in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 5: 263–269.Google Scholar
Byrd, J. D. and Coble, H. D. 1991b. Interference of common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 5: 270–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, J. and Hastie, T. 1997. Statistical Models in S. London: Chapman and Hall, p. 271.Google Scholar
Charles, G. W. 1991. A grower survey of weed and herbicide use in the New South Wales cotton industry. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 31: 387–392.Google Scholar
Davidian, M. and Giltinan, D. 1995. Inference based on linearization. Pages 174-175 in Davidian, M. and Giltinan, D., eds. Non-Linear Models for Repeated Measurement Data. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Fitt, G. P. 1989. The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 34: 17–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hearn, A. B. and Fitt, G. P. 1992. Cotton cropping systems. Pages 85-142 in Pearson, C. J., ed. Ecosystems of the World. 18: Field Crop Ecosystems. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Henry, W. T. and Bauman, T. T. 1989. Interference between soybeans (Glycine max) and common cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) under Indiana field conditions. Weed Sci. 37: 753–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, W. T. and Bauman, T. T. 1991. Interference between soybeans (Glycine max) and jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) in Indiana. Weed Technol. 5: 759–764.Google Scholar
Jordan, N. 1989. A statistical analysis of area-of-influence experiments. Weed Technol. 3: 114–121.Google Scholar
Mercer, K. L., Pawlak, J. A., Murray, D. S., Verhalen, L. M., Riffle, M. S., and McNew, R. D. 1990. Distance-of-influence of devil's-claw (Proboscidea louisianica) on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 4: 87–91.Google Scholar
Oliver, L. R., Chandler, J. M., and Buchanan, G. A. 1991. Influence of geographic region on jimsonweed (Datura stramonium) intetference in soybeans (Glycine max) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 39: 585–589.Google Scholar
Smyth, G. K. 1987. Generalised linear models with varying dispersion. J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 51: 47–60.Google Scholar
Snipes, C. E., Buchanan, G. A., Street, J. E., and McGuire, J. A. 1982. Competition of common cocklebur (Xanthium pensylvanicum) with cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Sci. 30: 553–556.Google Scholar